Where Do You Look? Visual Attention to Human Bodies across the Weight Spectrum in Individuals with Normal Weight or with Obesity.

Elisabeth Leehr, Katrin Elisabeth Giel, Norbert Schaeffeler, Isabelle Mack, Ansgar Thiel, Guido Zurstiege, Stephan Zipfel
Author Information
  1. Elisabeth Leehr: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how individuals with normal weight (NW) versus individuals with obesity (OB) visually explore human bodies varying in BMI.
METHODS: 16 OB (BMI 37.5 ± 7.7 kg/m²) and 35 NW (BMI 21.5 ± 1.6 kg/m²) visually explored 35 natural photographs and 25 avatars depicting male and female bodies ranging from normal weight to obesity. Gaze behaviour was assessed using eye tracking technology. Additionally, participants rated the attractiveness of all body stimuli.
RESULTS: A comparison of the displayed gaze behaviour shown by both participant weight classes indicates that regarding visual stimuli of obese natural bodies, all participants (OB + NW) looked at the waist longer, whereas regarding visual stimuli of normal-weight bodies, all participants viewed the head longer. Overall, OB spent less time looking at the bodies than NW. All participants rated normal-weight bodies as more attractive than obese bodies. However, the NW sample rated the depicted obese bodies as even less attractive than the OB sample did.
CONCLUSIONS: The BMI of the explored body, but not the observer's BMI, produces differences in the visual exploration of human bodies. The displayed exploration pattern of obese bodies can cautiously be interpreted as a 'de-individualised' and 'obesity-focused' perception. This tendency may prove in close relationship with the negative cultural views on obesity.

Keywords

References

  1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S80-6 [PMID: 18978768]
  2. Body Image. 2013 Jun;10(3):352-60 [PMID: 23608123]
  3. Health Psychol. 2002 Mar;21(2):131-8 [PMID: 11950103]
  4. Curr Obes Rep. 2014 Mar 1;3(1):127-36 [PMID: 24678445]
  5. Int J Eat Disord. 1996 Jul;20(1):65-76 [PMID: 8807354]
  6. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 19;10(10):e0140813 [PMID: 26479500]
  7. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):478-485 [PMID: 19578547]
  8. Psychiatry Res. 2012 Jul 30;198(2):321-3 [PMID: 22417927]
  9. Int J Eat Disord. 1994 Dec;16(4):363-70 [PMID: 7866415]
  10. Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Dec;41(6):1439-51 [PMID: 22402995]
  11. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Sep;54(5):562-570 [PMID: 27223624]
  12. Am J Public Health. 2010 Jun;100(6):1019-28 [PMID: 20075322]
  13. Psychosom Med. 2008 Jul;70(6):729-36 [PMID: 18606732]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 16;12:525 [PMID: 22800290]
  15. Biol Psychol. 2015 May;108:105-14 [PMID: 25813122]
  16. Eur Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;28(7):427-35 [PMID: 22999437]
  17. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jan;15(1):19-23 [PMID: 17228027]
  18. Psychother Psychosom. 2011;80(3):186-8 [PMID: 21389757]
  19. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2010 May;35(3):163-76 [PMID: 20420767]
  20. Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Jul;50(7):817-825 [PMID: 28252801]
  21. Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Oct;50(10):1205-1213 [PMID: 28851058]
  22. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jul - Aug;11(4):377-388 [PMID: 27079121]
  23. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Nov;45(8):1647-1661 [PMID: 28133705]
  24. Body Image. 2016 Dec;19:216-223 [PMID: 27821295]
  25. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;142:195-202 [PMID: 26560674]
  26. Body Image. 2004 Jan;1(1):43-56 [PMID: 18089140]
  27. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):519-26 [PMID: 25216561]
  28. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Jun;33(6):843-63 [PMID: 19428496]
  29. Obes Facts. 2016;9(6):424-441 [PMID: 28013298]
  30. Behav Brain Res. 2014 May 1;264:188-96 [PMID: 24512771]
  31. Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:208-212 [PMID: 27507132]
  32. Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Oct;49(10):937-946 [PMID: 27218865]
  33. Psychosom Med. 2009 Oct;71(8):907-12 [PMID: 19661192]
  34. Behav Res Ther. 2005 Feb;43(2):183-96 [PMID: 15629749]
  35. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2016 Mar;24(2):131-8 [PMID: 26621427]
  36. Appetite. 2015 Mar;86:88-95 [PMID: 25128833]
  37. Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Feb;50(2):139-147 [PMID: 27739586]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Eye Movements
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Human Body
Humans
Ideal Body Weight
Male
Obesity
Photic Stimulation
Photography
Thinness
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bodiesBMINWOBparticipantsobeseweightobesityratedstimulivisualindividualsnormalvisuallyhuman5±7kg/m²35explorednaturalbehaviourtrackingbodydisplayedregardinglongernormal-weightlessattractivesampleexplorationAttentionWeightObesityOBJECTIVE:investigatedversusexplorevaryingMETHODS:16372116photographs25avatarsdepictingmalefemalerangingGazeassessedusingeyetechnologyAdditionallyattractivenessRESULTS:comparisongazeshownparticipantclassesindicates+lookedwaistwhereasviewedheadOverallspenttimelookingHoweverdepictedevendidCONCLUSIONS:observer'sproducesdifferencespatterncancautiouslyinterpreted'de-individualised''obesity-focused'perceptiontendencymayprovecloserelationshipnegativeculturalviewsLook?VisualHumanBodiesacrossSpectrumIndividualsNormalBodyEye

Similar Articles

Cited By