Development of Friendship and Task Values in a New School: Friend Selection for the Arts and Physical Education but Socialization for Academic Subjects.

Angela Chow, Noona Kiuru, Philip D Parker, Jacquelynne S Eccles, Katariina Salmela-Aro
Author Information
  1. Angela Chow: Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, 1025 East 7th Street, Suite 116, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. chowa@indiana.edu. ORCID
  2. Noona Kiuru: Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Kärki, Mattilanniemi 6, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  3. Philip D Parker: Institute for Positive Psychology & Education, Australian Catholic University, 25A Barker Road, Strathfield, NSW, 2135, Australia.
  4. Jacquelynne S Eccles: School of Education, University of California, 3200 Education, Irvine, CA, 92697-5500, USA.
  5. Katariina Salmela-Aro: Department of Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, PL 9 (Siltavuorenpenger 1A), Room: 233, Helsinki, Finland.

Abstract

Friends provide important social contexts for student development. Research has shown that adolescent friends are similar to each other in their interest and values for different school subjects. Yet our current understanding does not extend to knowing whether selection, deselection, or socialization processes are responsible for this phenomena. Without this knowledge, it is very difficult for parents, teachers, and schools to know how and when to intervene. This study investigated selection, deselection, and socialization effects on adolescent students' task values for academic (languages, math and science, and social sciences) and non-academic subject areas (the arts and physical education). A social network approach was used to examine two waves of annual data collected from school-based networks of adolescents in the first and second years of high school education in Finland (N = 1419; female = 48.6%; mean age at first measurement point = 16). The results revealed that adolescents tended to select friends with similar levels of task values (friend selection) for the arts and physical education, but friends did not become more similar in these areas over time (friend socialization). In contrast, there was evidence of friend socialization, but not friend selection, for the academic school subjects. Across all subjects, differences in task values did not predict friendship dissolution (friend deselection). These findings suggest that to a significant extent, students make agentic choices in developing friendship with schoolmates based on their task values in non-academic subjects. The resultant friend contexts that individuals created, in turn, affected their task values in academic subject areas. These results shed light on the complexity of friend effect mechanisms on task values at the subject domain-specific level.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;50(11):2462-72 [PMID: 25221841]
  2. Dev Psychol. 2014 Mar;50(3):766-71 [PMID: 24015690]
  3. J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):801-12 [PMID: 20732711]
  4. J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Aug;46(8):1839-1850 [PMID: 28101746]
  5. Child Dev. 2007 Jul-Aug;78(4):1186-203 [PMID: 17650133]
  6. Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1978-1994 [PMID: 28805437]
  7. J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Apr;44(4):887-97 [PMID: 25119729]
  8. Child Dev. 2001 Jul-Aug;72(4):1135-50 [PMID: 11480938]
  9. J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):837-51 [PMID: 20926127]
  10. Dev Psychol. 2017 Jul;53(7):1356-1370 [PMID: 28394144]
  11. J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Mar;41(3):268-82 [PMID: 21769612]
  12. Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1677-93 [PMID: 24673293]
  13. J Res Adolesc. 2011 Mar 1;21(1):166-179 [PMID: 23730122]
  14. Child Dev. 1995 Oct;66(5):1312-29 [PMID: 7555218]
  15. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:109-32 [PMID: 11752481]
  16. Psychol Rep. 2011 Feb;108(1):75-93 [PMID: 21526593]
  17. Dev Psychol. 2016 Oct;52(10):1563-1577 [PMID: 27690495]
  18. Dev Psychol. 2010 Jul;46(4):927-38 [PMID: 20604612]
  19. Dev Psychol. 2012 Nov;48(6):1612-28 [PMID: 23127302]
  20. Aggress Behav. 2011 Sep-Oct;37(5):417-29 [PMID: 21688275]
  21. Dev Psychol. 2013 Jul;49(7):1242-52 [PMID: 22985296]
  22. J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Jan;38(1):41-50 [PMID: 19636790]
  23. J Res Adolesc. 2013 Sep 1;23(3):null [PMID: 24222971]

Grants

  1. 308351/Academy of Finland
  2. 273872/Academy of Finland

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
Art
Female
Finland
Friends
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Mathematics
Peer Group
Physical Education and Training
Schools
Social Networking
Socialization
Students

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0valuesfriendtasksubjectsselectionsocializationsocialfriendssimilarschooldeselectionacademicsubjectareaseducationcontextsadolescentnon-academicartsphysicalnetworkadolescentsfirstresultsfriendshipTaskSelectionSocializationFriendsprovideimportantstudentdevelopmentResearchshowninterestdifferentYetcurrentunderstandingextendknowingwhetherprocessesresponsiblephenomenaWithoutknowledgedifficultparentsteachersschoolsknowintervenestudyinvestigatedeffectsstudents'languagesmathsciencesciencesapproachusedexaminetwowavesannualdatacollectedschool-basednetworkssecondyearshighFinlandN = 1419female = 486%meanagemeasurementpoint = 16revealedtendedselectlevelsbecometimecontrastevidenceAcrossdifferencespredictdissolutionfindingssuggestsignificantextentstudentsmakeagenticchoicesdevelopingschoolmatesbasedresultantindividualscreatedturnaffectedshedlightcomplexityeffectmechanismsdomain-specificlevelDevelopmentFriendshipValuesNewSchool:FriendArtsPhysicalEducationAcademicSubjectsDeselectionSocialanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By