The Cut-off Values of Surrogate Measures for Insulin Sensitivity in a Healthy Population in Korea according to the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2007-2010.

Shinje Moon, Jung Hwan Park, Eun-Jung Jang, Yoo-Kyung Park, Jae Myung Yu, Joon-Sung Park, Youhern Ahn, Sung-Hee Choi, Hyung Joon Yoo
Author Information
  1. Shinje Moon: Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  2. Jung Hwan Park: Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  3. Eun-Jung Jang: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Osong, Korea. ORCID
  4. Yoo-Kyung Park: Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  5. Jae Myung Yu: Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  6. Joon-Sung Park: Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  7. Youhern Ahn: Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  8. Sung-Hee Choi: Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea. ORCID
  9. Hyung Joon Yoo: Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify the gender-specific characteristics of the surrogate measures of insulin resistance and to establish valid cut-off values for metabolic abnormalities in a representative sample in Korea.
METHODS: Data were collected from the datasets of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2007 and 2010. The total number of eligible participants was 10,997. We used three measures of insulin resistance: the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), McAuley index, and triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index. The estimated cut-off values were determined using the highest score of the Youden index.
RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) of the HOMA-IR, McAuley index, and TyG index were 0.737 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.725-0.750), 0.861 (95% CI, 0.853-0.870), and 0.877 (95% CI, 0.868-0.885), respectively. The cut-off values of the HOMA-IR were 2.20 in men, 2.55 in premenopausal women, and 2.03 in postmenopausal women, and those of the McAuley index were 6.4 in men and 6.6 in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. For the TyG index, the cut-off values were 4.76 in men and 4.71 in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the present study provides the valid cut-off values of the indirect surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity. These values may be used as reference for insulin sensitivity in a clinical setting and may provide a simple and supplementary method for identifying populations at risk of insulin resistance.

Keywords

References

  1. Adv Clin Chem. 2015;72:1-75 [PMID: 26471080]
  2. Metabolism. 1990 Feb;39(2):167-74 [PMID: 2405235]
  3. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Sep;89(3):303-8 [PMID: 20466446]
  4. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90430 [PMID: 24587359]
  5. J Korean Med Sci. 2006 Aug;21(4):695-700 [PMID: 16891815]
  6. BMC Endocr Disord. 2013 Oct 16;13:47 [PMID: 24131857]
  7. Metabolism. 2011 Dec;60(12):1673-6 [PMID: 21632070]
  8. Metabolism. 2005 Dec;54(12):1644-51 [PMID: 16311099]
  9. Diabetes. 1981 May;30(5):387-92 [PMID: 7014307]
  10. Diabetes Metab. 2012 Jun;38(3):258-63 [PMID: 22405724]
  11. Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;20(2):162-7 [PMID: 19327605]
  12. J Clin Invest. 1987 Mar;79(3):790-800 [PMID: 3546379]
  13. Metabolism. 2003 Jun;52(6):713-9 [PMID: 12800096]
  14. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jul;95(7):3347-51 [PMID: 20484475]
  15. Diabet Med. 2000 Apr;17(4):299-307 [PMID: 10821297]
  16. Stroke. 1996 Jan;27(1):37-43 [PMID: 8553400]
  17. N Engl J Med. 1996 Apr 11;334(15):952-7 [PMID: 8596596]
  18. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006 May;72(2):219-20 [PMID: 16310881]
  19. Diabetes Care. 2003 Dec;26(12):3320-5 [PMID: 14633821]
  20. Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):460-4 [PMID: 11289468]
  21. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jul;85(7):2402-10 [PMID: 10902785]
  22. Circulation. 2005 Oct 25;112(17):2735-52 [PMID: 16157765]
  23. Am J Physiol. 1979 Sep;237(3):E214-23 [PMID: 382871]
  24. Diabet Med. 2002 Apr;19(4):346-7 [PMID: 11943012]
  25. Diabetes Care. 2002 Aug;25(8):1371-7 [PMID: 12145237]
  26. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Oct;77(4):541-7 [PMID: 22106826]
  27. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008 Dec;6(4):299-304 [PMID: 19067533]
  28. Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Sep 15;160(6):540-8 [PMID: 15353414]
  29. Diabetes Care. 1999 Jul;22(7):1077-83 [PMID: 10388971]
  30. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Sep;93(3):e98-e100 [PMID: 21665314]
  31. Diabetologia. 1985 Jul;28(7):412-9 [PMID: 3899825]
  32. Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):831-7 [PMID: 7828312]

MeSH Term

Adult
Blood Glucose
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Insulin Resistance
Male
Nutrition Surveys
Republic of Korea
Triglycerides

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Triglycerides

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0indexvalues0insulincut-offMcAuleywomenmeasuresresistanceHOMA-IRTyG95%2menpremenopausalpostmenopausal64studysurrogatevalidKoreaKoreanNationalHealthNutritionExaminationSurveyusedCIsensitivitymayInsulinIndexBACKGROUND:aimedidentifygender-specificcharacteristicsestablishmetabolicabnormalitiesrepresentativesampleMETHODS:Datacollecteddatasets20072010totalnumbereligibleparticipants10997threeresistance:homeostasismodelassessment-insulintriglycerideglucoseestimateddeterminedusinghighestscoreYoudenRESULTS:areacurveAUC737confidenceinterval[CI]725-0750861853-0870877868-0885respectively2055037671CONCLUSION:conclusionpresentprovidesindirectreferenceclinicalsettingprovidesimplesupplementarymethodidentifyingpopulationsriskCut-offValuesSurrogateMeasuresSensitivityHealthyPopulationaccordingKNHANES2007-2010HomeostasisModelAssessmentResistanceMetabolicSyndromeTriglycerideGlucose

Similar Articles

Cited By