The German Food Bank System and Its Users-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Anja Simmet, Peter Tinnemann, Nanette Stroebele-Benschop
Author Information
  1. Anja Simmet: Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. Anja.Simmet@uni-hohenheim.de.
  2. Peter Tinnemann: Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics at the Charité University Medical Center Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany. peter.tinnemann@charite.de.
  3. Nanette Stroebele-Benschop: Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. N.Stroebele@uni-hohenheim.de.

Abstract

Although food banks are a well-known resource for low-income people struggling to meet their food needs, they have rarely been investigated on a large scale. This study aims to contribute to the actual debate about the potential and limitations of food banks to decrease the prevalence of food insecurity by providing a representative picture of the German food bank system and its users. Publicly accessible data were used to map residents, public welfare recipients, and food banks. In addition, a comprehensive survey was distributed to all 934 "Tafel" food banks. The results show that nearly all residents and welfare recipients have access to at least one food bank located in the districts in which they reside. Differences in the density of food banks exist between eastern and western Germany. Food banks provide mainly healthy fresh food, but they heavily rely on food donations from local retailers and on volunteer labor. Although changes in the number of user households by income seem to mirror trends in the number of welfare recipients, food bank users appear to represent only a fraction of the food-insecure population in Germany. Food banks might have the potential to improve users' diet and food security, but they are not able to reach all food-insecure residents in Germany.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Public Health. 2012 Oct;22(5):721-6 [PMID: 21750012]
  2. J Nutr. 2007 Aug;137(8):1980-7 [PMID: 17634274]
  3. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):563-576 [PMID: 27727100]
  4. BMJ Open. 2014 May 16;4(5):e004657 [PMID: 24838723]
  5. J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Mar 29;:null [PMID: 29600471]
  6. Public Health Nutr. 2008 Apr;11(4):395-404 [PMID: 17666136]
  7. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Nov;107(11):1952-61 [PMID: 17964316]
  8. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Nov;34(11):1956-63 [PMID: 26526255]
  9. Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 24;14:141 [PMID: 26601718]
  10. J Community Health. 2012 Feb;37(1):253-64 [PMID: 21644024]
  11. BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 28;14:1234 [PMID: 25432209]
  12. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jan 28;9:96-101 [PMID: 29527460]
  13. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):569-75 [PMID: 24139769]
  14. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Apr;111(4):573-6 [PMID: 21443991]
  15. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 May;115(5):695-700 [PMID: 25596896]
  16. Eur J Nutr. 2012 Sep;51(6):637-63 [PMID: 22684631]
  17. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):577-588 [PMID: 27727101]
  18. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Dec;24(6):560-71 [PMID: 21564343]
  19. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Apr;14(2):356-60 [PMID: 21267655]
  20. Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1298-301 [PMID: 3421384]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet
Family Characteristics
Female
Food Assistance
Food Supply
Germany
Humans
Income
Male
Poverty
Prevalence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Volunteers
Vulnerable Populations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodbanksbankwelfarerecipientsresidentsGermanyFoodAlthoughpotentialinsecurityGermanusersnumberfood-insecurewell-knownresourcelow-incomepeoplestrugglingmeetneedsrarelyinvestigatedlargescalestudyaimscontributeactualdebatelimitationsdecreaseprevalenceprovidingrepresentativepicturesystemPubliclyaccessibledatausedmappublicadditioncomprehensivesurveydistributed934"Tafel"resultsshownearlyaccessleastonelocateddistrictsresideDifferencesdensityexisteasternwesternprovidemainlyhealthyfreshheavilyrelydonationslocalretailersvolunteerlaborchangesuserhouseholdsincomeseemmirrortrendsappearrepresentfractionpopulationmightimproveusers'dietsecurityablereachBankSystemUsers-ACross-SectionalStudyaidsupplypoverty

Similar Articles

Cited By