Testing the Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an 8-Week Exercise and Compensatory Eating Intervention.

Jessica S West, Kym J Guelfi, James A Dimmock, Ben Jackson
Author Information
  1. Jessica S West: School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. jessica.west@research.uwa.edu.au.
  2. Kym J Guelfi: School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. kym.guelfi@uwa.edu.au.
  3. James A Dimmock: School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. james.dimmock@uwa.edu.au.
  4. Ben Jackson: School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. ben.jackson@uwa.edu.au.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an intervention comprised of regular exercise alongside educational and motivational support for participants' avoidance of unhealthy compensatory eating. Forty-five sedentary individuals were randomized to an 8-week exercise plus compensatory eating avoidance program (CEAP; = 24), or an 8-week exercise intervention only (control; = 21). The feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the intervention were assessed using quantitative measures and supplemented with written responses to open-ended questions. The CEAP workshop was well-received; however, self-reported use of some of the included behavior change strategies was lower than expected. Post-intervention, there was evidence of reduced self-reported compensatory eating for participants in the CEAP group but not controls, with CEAP participants also reporting greater use of coping plans relative to controls post-intervention. The exercise program had benefits for waist circumference, body fat percentage, blood pressure, and cardiovascular fitness; however, improvements were similar between groups. Taken together, the results of this study indicate that the CEAP is feasible and may reduce compensatory eating around exercise; however, this effect is small. Potential modifications to the CEAP are discussed within the paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jan;32(1):177-84 [PMID: 17848941]
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59 [PMID: 21694556]
  3. Am J Med. 2011 Aug;124(8):747-55 [PMID: 21787904]
  4. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Nov;41(11):1129-1136 [PMID: 27769147]
  5. J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(4):268-78 [PMID: 25692817]
  6. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81 [PMID: 7154893]
  7. J Obes. 2015;2015:693829 [PMID: 26199740]
  8. Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701 [PMID: 19916637]
  9. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):572-87 [PMID: 17087574]
  10. J Behav Med. 2012 Aug;35(4):443-51 [PMID: 21822980]
  11. Nutrition. 2018 Apr 6;55-56:15-20 [PMID: 29960151]
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(12):924-7 [PMID: 19793728]
  13. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6 [PMID: 4053261]
  14. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 10;18(6):e147 [PMID: 27287823]
  15. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(11-12):1621-1631 [PMID: 27535118]
  16. Br J Health Psychol. 2013 Nov;18(4):814-26 [PMID: 23331851]
  17. Appetite. 2012 Apr;58(2):608-15 [PMID: 22245723]
  18. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jan 16;12:2 [PMID: 25592314]
  19. Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:323-329 [PMID: 27554186]
  20. Public Health Nutr. 2006 May;9(3):375-83 [PMID: 16684390]
  21. Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:1-7 [PMID: 24879888]
  22. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Mar 03;10:29 [PMID: 23452345]
  23. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Dec;24(12):1715-25 [PMID: 11126230]
  24. Metabolism. 2013 Feb;62(2):235-43 [PMID: 22959499]
  25. Health Psychol. 2004 May;23(3):319-23 [PMID: 15099174]
  26. J Obes. 2011;2011:null [PMID: 20886014]
  27. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92 [PMID: 23159157]
  28. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 15;14(1):125 [PMID: 28915825]
  29. J Nutr Sci. 2016 Mar 09;5:e7 [PMID: 27066256]
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549-76 [PMID: 18652544]
  31. Obes Rev. 2012 Oct;13(10):835-47 [PMID: 22681398]
  32. Behav Med. 2016;42(2):93-104 [PMID: 25148129]
  33. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Mar;105(3):660-668 [PMID: 28122785]
  34. Br J Health Psychol. 2013 Feb;18(1):139-54 [PMID: 23006056]
  35. Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98 [PMID: 21678185]
  36. Iran J Public Health. 2015 Aug;44(8):1156-7 [PMID: 26587484]
  37. Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:1-10 [PMID: 28433774]
  38. J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(2):109-17 [PMID: 25611932]
  39. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):1 [PMID: 29611687]
  40. Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;33(12):1530-40 [PMID: 24274802]
  41. J Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(8):1094-1100 [PMID: 26826167]
  42. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Dec;29(12):1549-53 [PMID: 9432085]

MeSH Term

Adiposity
Adult
Body Mass Index
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Cohort Studies
Diet, Healthy
Energy Intake
Exercise
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Healthy Lifestyle
Humans
Male
Motivation
Nutritional Sciences
Overweight
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Satisfaction
Psychosocial Support Systems
Waist Circumference
Western Australia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CEAPexercisecompensatoryeatinginterventionhoweverstudyfeasibilitypreliminaryefficacyavoidance8-weekprogram=self-reporteduseparticipantscontrolsaimevaluatecomprisedregularalongsideeducationalmotivationalsupportparticipants'unhealthyForty-fivesedentaryindividualsrandomizedplus24control21assessedusingquantitativemeasuressupplementedwrittenresponsesopen-endedquestionsworkshopwell-receivedincludedbehaviorchangestrategieslowerexpectedPost-interventionevidencereducedgroupalsoreportinggreatercopingplansrelativepost-interventionbenefitswaistcircumferencebodyfatpercentagebloodpressurecardiovascularfitnessimprovementssimilargroupsTakentogetherresultsindicatefeasiblemayreducearoundeffectsmallPotentialmodificationsdiscussedwithinpaperTestingFeasibilityPreliminaryEfficacy8-WeekExerciseCompensatoryEatingInterventionsnackingjustificationnutritionphysicalactivity

Similar Articles

Cited By