Inhibit My Disinhibition: The Role of the Inferior Frontal Cortex in Sexual Inhibition and the Modulatory Influence of Sexual Excitation Proneness.

Geraldine Rodriguez, Alexander T Sack, Marieke Dewitte, Teresa Schuhmann
Author Information
  1. Geraldine Rodriguez: Brain Stimulation and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  2. Alexander T Sack: Brain Stimulation and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  3. Marieke Dewitte: Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  4. Teresa Schuhmann: Brain Stimulation and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Abstract

Sexual behaviour is the result of an interplay between distinct neural inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms. Individual differences in sexual excitation and sexual inhibition are proposed to play an important role in the processes sustaining the regulation of sexual behaviour. While much research has focused on the neural correlates of response inhibition, highlighting a prominent role of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), very little is known regarding the neural mechanisms underlying different aspects of sexual inhibition. Here, we experimentally combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to: (i) test the functional role of IFG during motivational and cognitive sexual inhibition; and (ii) reveal whether this IFG involvement in sexual inhibitory processes depends on sexual excitation and sexual inhibition as traits. Twenty-two participants performed an Approach-Avoidance (AA) and a Negative Affective Priming (NAP) paradigm to assess motivational and cognitive sexual inhibition respectively. Our fMRI study showed IFG being selectively activated during cognitive but not motivational sexual inhibition. Importantly, the level of this neural activity was modulated by individual sexual excitation scores. Interestingly, a transient disruption of IFG activity using TMS led to an improvement in cognitive, not motivational, sexual inhibition, but only when accounting for individual sexual excitation scores. These findings clearly document that sexual excitation modulates IFG activity levels during cognitive sexual inhibition, and at the same time determines the effects of TMS on IFG by improving cognitive control exclusively for individuals with high sexual excitation scores. These findings provide new insights regarding the functional role of IFG, and underscore the relevance of individual psychological differences in understanding the brain mechanisms underlying socioaffective processes.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Nov 30;9:321 [PMID: 26648855]
  2. J Sex Res. 2009 Mar-Jun;46(2-3):121-42 [PMID: 19308839]
  3. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jul;36(6):1481-509 [PMID: 22465619]
  4. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2321-9 [PMID: 24702449]
  5. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Oct 20;12(11):652-69 [PMID: 22011681]
  6. Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):306-24 [PMID: 18466742]
  7. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Jul;24(5):571-9 [PMID: 10880822]
  8. Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 06;5:4073 [PMID: 24905116]
  9. Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Oct;40(5):995-1006 [PMID: 20862534]
  10. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jul;72(1):93-102 [PMID: 23963964]
  11. Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Mar;39(5):821-31 [PMID: 24289860]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 3;107(31):13966-71 [PMID: 20631303]
  13. Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 1;32(1):457-64 [PMID: 16644236]
  14. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 30;11(11):e0165646 [PMID: 27902711]
  15. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1224:40-62 [PMID: 21486295]
  16. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 30;31(13):4805-10 [PMID: 21451018]
  17. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jan 20;206(2):279-85 [PMID: 19781579]
  18. Brain Res. 2008 Aug 11;1224:79-87 [PMID: 18603230]
  19. J Sex Res. 2002 May;39(2):114-26 [PMID: 12476243]
  20. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e102419 [PMID: 25013940]
  21. J Sex Res. 2004 Aug;41(3):225-34 [PMID: 15497051]
  22. J Sex Med. 2016 Sep;13(9):1323-1331 [PMID: 27486137]
  23. Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;132(2):297-326 [PMID: 16536645]
  24. Magn Reson Med. 2006 Jun;55(6):1227-35 [PMID: 16680688]
  25. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Oct;39(5):1029-43 [PMID: 20143148]
  26. Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):219-33 [PMID: 25559323]
  27. Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):636-47 [PMID: 7596267]
  28. Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):689-99 [PMID: 16962339]
  29. Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Feb;48(2):481-494 [PMID: 30671876]
  30. Horm Behav. 2007 Dec;52(5):581-9 [PMID: 17826777]
  31. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6 [PMID: 15664172]
  32. Magn Reson Med. 2012 May;67(5):1210-24 [PMID: 21858868]
  33. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13 [PMID: 17254636]
  34. J Neurosci. 2001 Sep 15;21(18):RC165 [PMID: 11549754]
  35. Arch Sex Behav. 1999 Feb;28(1):1-21 [PMID: 10097801]
  36. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005 Jun;30(5):461-82 [PMID: 15721058]
  37. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):177-85 [PMID: 24440116]
  38. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Aug;19(8):445-52 [PMID: 26160027]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sexualinhibitionIFGexcitationcognitiveneuralrolemotivationalSexualmechanismsprocessesfunctionalTMSactivityindividualscoresbehaviourinhibitorydifferencesresponseinferiorfrontalgyrusregardingunderlyingmagneticfMRIstimulationfindingsbrainresultinterplaydistinctexcitatoryIndividualproposedplayimportantsustainingregulationmuchresearchfocusedcorrelateshighlightingprominentlittleknowndifferentaspectsexperimentallycombinedresonanceimagingtranscranialto:testiirevealwhetherinvolvementdependstraitsTwenty-twoparticipantsperformedApproach-AvoidanceAANegativeAffectivePrimingNAPparadigmassessrespectivelystudyshowedselectivelyactivatedImportantlylevelmodulatedInterestinglytransientdisruptionusingledimprovementaccountingclearlydocumentmodulateslevelstimedetermineseffectsimprovingcontrolexclusivelyindividualshighprovidenewinsightsunderscorerelevancepsychologicalunderstandingsocioaffectiveInhibitDisinhibition:RoleInferiorFrontalCortexInhibitionModulatoryInfluenceExcitationPronenessapproach-avoidancenegativepriming

Similar Articles

Cited By