tDCS Modulatory Effect on Reading Processes: A Review of Studies on Typical Readers and Individuals With Dyslexia.

Alice Cancer, Alessandro Antonietti
Author Information
  1. Alice Cancer: Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
  2. Alessandro Antonietti: Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

The possibility to use non-invasive brain stimulation to modulate reading performance in individuals with developmental dyslexia (DD) has been recently explored by few empirical investigations. The present systematic review includes nine studies which have employed transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) aiming at improving reading abilities in both typical readers and individuals with DD. Anodal tDCS over the left temporo-parietal cortex-a region which is typically involved in phonological and orthographic processing during reading tasks and underactive in individuals with DD-was the most frequently used montage. The majority of studies employing such stimulation protocol showed significant improvement in differential reading subprocesses. More precisely, word decoding was improved in adult readers, whereas non-word and low-frequency word reading in younger individuals. Furthermore, tDCS was found to be specifically effective in poor readers and individuals with DD rather than typical readers, in spite of the specific brain region targeted by the stimulation; Left frontal, left temporo-parietal, and right cerebellar tDCS failed to modulate reading in already proficient readers. Overall, tDCS appears to be a promising remedial tool for reading difficulties, even when applied to younger populations with reading problems. Further empirical evidence is needed to confirm the potential of neuromodulation as a successful intervention method for DD.

Keywords

References

  1. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:107-13 [PMID: 25701796]
  2. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:928631 [PMID: 25861158]
  3. Neuroscientist. 2016 Feb 12;:null [PMID: 26873962]
  4. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 16;9:114 [PMID: 25852513]
  5. Exp Neurol. 1962 Jun;5:436-52 [PMID: 13882165]
  6. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;126(11):2181-8 [PMID: 25922128]
  7. Biol Psychiatry. 2004 May 1;55(9):926-33 [PMID: 15110736]
  8. Child Dev. 2011 May-Jun;82(3):1013-28 [PMID: 21418055]
  9. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):254-62 [PMID: 21592844]
  10. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):649-53 [PMID: 23122917]
  11. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):640-54 [PMID: 21631313]
  12. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 22;7:139 [PMID: 23626530]
  13. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):696-700 [PMID: 23415937]
  14. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(3):207-13 [PMID: 10982498]
  15. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):295-310 [PMID: 17943007]
  16. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Oct;6:176-94 [PMID: 23770059]
  17. Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2257-60 [PMID: 9694210]
  18. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar 14;:null [PMID: 29550525]
  19. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e83668 [PMID: 24427278]
  20. Neuroscience. 2012 Oct 25;223:56-67 [PMID: 22863670]
  21. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):335-41 [PMID: 15951224]
  22. Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 21;22(4):R108-11 [PMID: 22361141]
  23. Curr Biol. 2012 May 8;22(9):814-9 [PMID: 22483940]
  24. Neuron. 2013 Jul 10;79(1):180-90 [PMID: 23746630]
  25. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 [PMID: 10990547]
  26. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):201-207 [PMID: 22305346]
  27. Neuroscientist. 2004 Aug;10(4):362-71 [PMID: 15271263]
  28. Neuron. 2004 Oct 28;44(3):411-22 [PMID: 15504323]
  29. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(2):215-26 [PMID: 26890096]
  30. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100 [PMID: 19621070]
  31. Ann Dyslexia. 2008 Jun;58(1):1-14 [PMID: 18483867]
  32. Neuron. 2007 Jul 5;55(1):143-56 [PMID: 17610823]
  33. Neuropsychologia. 2013 Dec;51(14):2953-9 [PMID: 24184439]
  34. Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 06;6:1510 [PMID: 26500581]
  35. Brain Stimul. 2011 Oct;4(4):275-80 [PMID: 22032743]
  36. Brain. 2005 Feb;128(Pt 2):261-7 [PMID: 15574467]
  37. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 01;6:120 [PMID: 22557962]
  38. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):535-50 [PMID: 25701175]
  39. Brain. 2002 Oct;125(Pt 10):2272-85 [PMID: 12244084]
  40. Neuroimage. 2008 Nov 15;43(3):581-91 [PMID: 18778780]
  41. Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:64-82 [PMID: 27912107]
  42. Front Neurosci. 2016 Jun 07;10:262 [PMID: 27375421]
  43. Brain. 2003 Apr;126(Pt 4):841-65 [PMID: 12615643]
  44. Neurology. 2002 Apr 23;58(8):1203-13 [PMID: 11971088]
  45. Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1329-49 [PMID: 18838044]
  46. Neuroscientist. 2010 Jun;16(3):285-307 [PMID: 20040569]
  47. J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 1;18(17):6939-51 [PMID: 9712663]
  48. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Aug 14;404(1-2):232-6 [PMID: 16808997]
  49. Brain Res. 2006 Oct 3;1113(1):174-85 [PMID: 16934234]
  50. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1145:237-59 [PMID: 19076401]
  51. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(5):593-607 [PMID: 22141434]
  52. Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 23;27(5):295-300 [PMID: 26848997]
  53. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2645-51 [PMID: 22820638]
  54. Neuron. 1998 Aug;21(2):279-82 [PMID: 9728909]
  55. Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1735-42 [PMID: 21338695]
  56. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 20;8:347 [PMID: 24904383]
  57. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):816-47 [PMID: 22584224]
  58. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:369-82 [PMID: 14199369]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0readingtDCSindividualsreadersstimulationDDbrainmodulatedyslexiaempiricalstudiestypicallefttemporo-parietalregionwordyoungerneuromodulationinterventionpossibilityusenon-invasiveperformancedevelopmentalrecentlyexploredinvestigationspresentsystematicreviewincludesnineemployedtranscranialdirectcurrentaimingimprovingabilitiesAnodalcortex-atypicallyinvolvedphonologicalorthographicprocessingtasksunderactiveDD-wasfrequentlyusedmontagemajorityemployingprotocolshowedsignificantimprovementdifferentialsubprocessespreciselydecodingimprovedadultwhereasnon-wordlow-frequencyFurthermorefoundspecificallyeffectivepoorratherspitespecifictargetedLeftfrontalrightcerebellarfailedalreadyproficientOverallappearspromisingremedialtooldifficultiesevenappliedpopulationsproblemsevidenceneededconfirmpotentialsuccessfulmethodModulatoryEffectReadingProcesses:ReviewStudiesTypicalReadersIndividualsDyslexia

Similar Articles

Cited By