High-Speed Videography Reveals How Honeybees Can Turn a Spatial Concept Learning Task Into a Simple Discrimination Task by Stereotyped Flight Movements and Sequential Inspection of Pattern Elements.

Marie Guiraud, Mark Roper, Lars Chittka
Author Information
  1. Marie Guiraud: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  2. Mark Roper: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  3. Lars Chittka: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Honey bees display remarkable visual learning abilities, providing insights regarding visual information processing in a miniature brain. It was discovered that bees can solve a task that is generally viewed as spatial concept learning in primates, specifically the concept of "above" and "below." In these works, two pairs of visual stimuli were shown in the two arms of a Y-maze. Each arm displayed a "referent" shape (e.g., a cross, or a horizontal line) and a second geometric shape that appeared either above or below the referent. Bees learning the "concept of aboveness" had to choose the arm of the Y-maze in which a shape--occurred above the referent, while those learning the "concept of belowness" had to pick the arm in which there was an arbitrary item beneath the referent. Here, we explore the sequential decision-making process that allows bees to solve this task by analyzing their flight trajectories inside the Y-maze. Over 368 h of high-speed video footage of the bees' choice strategies were analyzed in detail. In our experiments, many bees failed the task, and, with the possible exception of a single forager, bees as a group failed to reach significance in picking the correct arm from the decision chamber of the maze. Of those bees that succeeded in choosing correctly, most required a close-up inspection of the targets. These bees typically employed a close-up scan of only the bottom part of the pattern before taking the decision of landing on a feeder. When rejecting incorrect feeders, they repeatedly scanned the pattern features, but were still, on average, faster at completing the task than the non-leaners. This shows that solving a concept learning task could actually be mediated by turning it into a more manageable discrimination task by some animals, although one individual in this study appeared to have gained the ability (by the end of the training) to solve the task in a manner predicted by concept learning.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Biol. 2012 Jul 1;215(Pt 13):2173-80 [PMID: 22675177]
  2. Behav Processes. 2015 Jun;115:81-93 [PMID: 25746438]
  3. Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):67-74 [PMID: 17516101]
  4. Behav Processes. 1999 Nov;48(1-2):1-9 [PMID: 24897558]
  5. PLoS Biol. 2016 Oct 4;14(10):e1002564 [PMID: 27701411]
  6. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Jan;22(1):60-7 [PMID: 8568496]
  7. Science. 1980 Nov 21;210(4472):922-5 [PMID: 7434008]
  8. Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):234-54 [PMID: 16621333]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 7;275(1636):803-8 [PMID: 18198141]
  10. Learn Behav. 2016 Sep;44(3):295-302 [PMID: 26850761]
  11. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Oct 11;284(1864):null [PMID: 28978727]
  12. Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):952-65 [PMID: 9383618]
  13. Nature. 2003 Jul 24;424(6947):388 [PMID: 12879057]
  14. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1955 Jun;48(3):188-94 [PMID: 13242688]
  15. Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):315-324 [PMID: 10049470]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):223-50 [PMID: 16812369]
  17. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2677-85 [PMID: 22927566]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 22;278(1707):898-905 [PMID: 21068040]
  19. Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):286-8 [PMID: 27418508]
  20. Behav Processes. 1998 Feb;42(2-3):87-99 [PMID: 24897456]
  21. Behav Processes. 2017 Jul;140:6-15 [PMID: 28323077]
  22. J Exp Biol. 2016 Nov 1;219(Pt 21):3465-3472 [PMID: 27591315]
  23. Curr Biol. 2017 Jan 23;27(2):224-230 [PMID: 28017607]
  24. Learn Behav. 2006 May;34(2):144-53 [PMID: 16933800]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7481-6 [PMID: 22517740]
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;14(11):477-81 [PMID: 20685155]
  27. Curr Biol. 2016 Feb 22;26(4):531-5 [PMID: 26853364]
  28. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Feb 3;13(2):e1005333 [PMID: 28158189]
  29. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):415-33 [PMID: 15355147]
  30. Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Apr;31(2):109-30; discussion 130-178 [PMID: 18479531]
  31. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 09;280(1772):20131907 [PMID: 24107530]
  32. Science. 1999 Jan 1;283(5398):77-80 [PMID: 9872745]
  33. J Comp Psychol. 2004 Dec;118(4):403-12 [PMID: 15584777]
  34. Nature. 1996 Aug 1;382(6590):458-61 [PMID: 18610516]
  35. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):513-29 [PMID: 6491610]
  36. Nature. 2001 Apr 19;410(6831):930-3 [PMID: 11309617]
  37. Behav Neurosci. 1989 Apr;103(2):227-34 [PMID: 2706069]
  38. Science. 2018 Jun 08;360(6393):1124-1126 [PMID: 29880690]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0beeslearningtaskvisualconceptarmsolveY-mazereferenttwoshapeappeared"conceptvideofaileddecisionclose-uppatternfeaturesTaskHoneydisplayremarkableabilitiesprovidinginsightsregardinginformationprocessingminiaturebraindiscoveredcangenerallyviewedspatialprimatesspecifically"above""below"workspairsstimulishownarmsdisplayed"referent"egcrosshorizontallinesecondgeometriceitherBeesaboveness"chooseshape--occurredbelowness"pickarbitraryitembeneathexploresequentialdecision-makingprocessallowsanalyzingflighttrajectoriesinside368hhigh-speedfootagebees'choicestrategiesanalyzeddetailexperimentsmanypossibleexceptionsingleforagergroupreachsignificancepickingcorrectchambermazesucceededchoosingcorrectlyrequiredinspectiontargetstypicallyemployedscanbottomparttakinglandingfeederrejectingincorrectfeedersrepeatedlyscannedstillaveragefastercompletingnon-leanersshowssolvingactuallymediatedturningmanageablediscriminationanimalsalthoughoneindividualstudygainedabilityendtrainingmannerpredictedHigh-SpeedVideographyRevealsHoneybeesCanTurnSpatialConceptLearningSimpleDiscriminationStereotypedFlightMovementsSequentialInspectionPatternElementsApismelliferaactivevisioncognitionfeaturedetectionlocaltracking

Similar Articles

Cited By