Information Processing: The Language and Analytical Tools for Cognitive Psychology in the Information Age.

Aiping Xiong, Robert W Proctor
Author Information
  1. Aiping Xiong: Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
  2. Robert W Proctor: Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Abstract

The information age can be dated to the work of Norbert Wiener and Claude Shannon in the 1940s. Their work on cybernetics and information theory, and many subsequent developments, had a profound influence on reshaping the field of psychology from what it was prior to the 1950s. Contemporaneously, advances also occurred in experimental design and inferential statistical testing stemming from the work of Ronald Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, and Egon Pearson. These interdisciplinary advances from outside of psychology provided the conceptual and methodological tools for what is often called the cognitive revolution but is more accurately described as the information-processing revolution. Cybernetics set the stage with the idea that everything ranging from neurophysiological mechanisms to societal activities can be modeled as structured control systems with feedforward and feedback loops. Information theory offered a way to quantify entropy and information, and promoted theorizing in terms of information flow. Statistical theory provided means for making scientific inferences from the results of controlled experiments and for conceptualizing human decision making. With those three pillars, a cognitive psychology adapted to the information age evolved. The growth of technology in the information age has resulted in human lives being increasingly interweaved with the cyber environment, making cognitive psychology an essential part of interdisciplinary research on such interweaving. Continued engagement in interdisciplinary research at the forefront of technology development provides a chance for psychologists not only to refine their theories but also to play a major role in the advent of a new age of science.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):173-85 [PMID: 19229240]
  2. Sci Am. 1948 Nov;179(5):14-8 [PMID: 18890151]
  3. Hum Factors. 2016 Feb;58(1):150-62 [PMID: 26490442]
  4. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97 [PMID: 13310704]
  5. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):141-144 [PMID: 12639696]
  6. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017 Jun;43(6):889-901 [PMID: 28166428]
  7. J Exp Psychol. 1952 Oct;44(4):260-6 [PMID: 13000067]
  8. Cogn Process. 2006 Jun;7(2):73-88 [PMID: 16683170]
  9. Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Feb;39:163-76 [PMID: 25485765]
  10. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jun;20(6):414-424 [PMID: 27118642]
  11. Psychol Rev. 1963 Jan;70:80-90 [PMID: 14027390]
  12. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Mar;45(3):188-96 [PMID: 13052851]
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980 Jul 8;290(1038):181-97 [PMID: 6106237]
  14. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Sep;46(3):199-210 [PMID: 13084867]
  15. Biophys Chem. 2017 Oct;229:173-180 [PMID: 28705333]
  16. Br J Psychol. 1956 Feb;47(1):30-43 [PMID: 13304278]
  17. Br J Psychol Gen Sect. 1948 Mar;38(Pt 3):142-8 [PMID: 18913657]
  18. Bull Math Biol. 1990;52(1-2):99-115; discussion 73-97 [PMID: 2185863]
  19. J Math Psychol. 2017 Apr;77:94-110 [PMID: 28630524]
  20. Psychol Rev. 1961 Sep;68:301-40 [PMID: 13774292]
  21. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1281-1299 [PMID: 28434379]
  22. Trends Neurosci. 2016 Aug;39(8):512-526 [PMID: 27378546]
  23. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937 [PMID: 12239891]
  24. Br J Psychol Gen Sect. 1947 Dec;38(Pt 2):56-61 [PMID: 18917476]
  25. Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):487-98 [PMID: 26348332]
  26. Psychol Rev. 1970 Mar;77(2):73-99 [PMID: 5454129]
  27. Psychol Rev. 1951 Nov;58(6):446-59 [PMID: 14900305]
  28. Hist Psychol. 2007 Feb;10(1):44-72 [PMID: 17575813]
  29. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 02;8:680 [PMID: 25228875]
  30. J Mot Behav. 1971 Jun;3(2):111-49 [PMID: 15155169]
  31. Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):457-79 [PMID: 22468607]
  32. Neural Comput. 1997 May 15;9(4):721-63 [PMID: 9161021]
  33. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1701-12 [PMID: 24820672]
  34. Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):333-67 [PMID: 15065913]
  35. Ergonomics. 2011 Dec;54(12):1111-29 [PMID: 22103721]
  36. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):1230-3 [PMID: 22023743]
  37. Neural Comput. 2004 Jan;16(1):1-38 [PMID: 15006021]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1921 Oct;7(10):294-8 [PMID: 16576610]
  39. Phys Life Rev. 2013 Sep;10(3):235-66 [PMID: 23769678]
  40. J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91 [PMID: 13174710]
  41. J Math Psychol. 2017 Dec;81:80-97 [PMID: 29200501]
  42. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136 [PMID: 7351125]
  43. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968 Dec 31;171(1024):279-96 [PMID: 4387405]
  44. J Hist Biol. 2015 Summer;48(2):301-35 [PMID: 25311906]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0informationagetheorypsychologyworkinterdisciplinarycognitiveInformationmakingcancyberneticsadvancesalsoprovidedrevolutionscientifichumantechnologyresearchdatedNorbertWienerClaudeShannon1940smanysubsequentdevelopmentsprofoundinfluencereshapingfieldprior1950sContemporaneouslyoccurredexperimentaldesigninferentialstatisticaltestingstemmingRonaldFisherJerzyNeymanEgonPearsonoutsideconceptualmethodologicaltoolsoftencalledaccuratelydescribedinformation-processingCyberneticssetstageideaeverythingrangingneurophysiologicalmechanismssocietalactivitiesmodeledstructuredcontrolsystemsfeedforwardfeedbackloopsofferedwayquantifyentropypromotedtheorizingtermsflowStatisticalmeansinferencesresultscontrolledexperimentsconceptualizingdecisionthreepillarsadaptedevolvedgrowthresultedlivesincreasinglyinterweavedcyberenvironmentessentialpartinterweavingContinuedengagementforefrontdevelopmentprovideschancepsychologistsrefinetheoriesplaymajorroleadventnewscienceProcessing:LanguageAnalyticalToolsCognitivePsychologyAgemethodssmalldata

Similar Articles

Cited By