Preimplantation genetic diagnosis versus prenatal diagnosis-decision-making among pregnant FMR1 premutation carriers.

Lilach Marom Haham, Inbal Avrahami, Noam Domniz, Liat Ries-Levavi, Michal Berkenstadt, Raoul Orvieto, Yoram Cohen, Shai E Elizur
Author Information
  1. Lilach Marom Haham: IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. mh.lilach@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Inbal Avrahami: IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  3. Noam Domniz: IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  4. Liat Ries-Levavi: The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  5. Michal Berkenstadt: The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  6. Raoul Orvieto: IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  7. Yoram Cohen: IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  8. Shai E Elizur: IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To detect which factors influence decision-making among pregnant FMR1 premutation carriers regarding the preferred mode of genetic diagnosis: IVF-PGT-M (in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic gene diseases), or CVS (chorionic villus sampling), or AC (amniocentesis) after spontaneous conception.
METHODS: In Israel FMR1 premutation preconception genetic screening is offered, free of charge, to every woman in her reproductive years. FMR1 premutation carriers with ≥ 70 CGG repeats, or a history of FXS offspring, are offered IVF-PGT-M. This is a historical cohort study including all pregnant FMR1 premutation carriers who underwent prenatal diagnosis between the years 2011 and 2016 at a tertiary medical center. Data were collected from electronic charts and through phone interviews.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five women with high-risk pregnancies who were offered IVF-PGT-M were evaluated. In 37 pregnancies (21%), the women decided to undergo IVF-PGT-M. Using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) statistical method including seven parameters, we found that previous termination of pregnancy due to FXS and advanced woman's age were significantly associated with making the decision to undergo IVF-PGT-M. Previously failed IVF was the most significant parameter in a woman's decision not to undergo IVF-PGT-M.
CONCLUSION: The most dominant factor affecting the decision of FMR1 premutation carriers to choose spontaneous conception with prenatal diagnosis versus IVF-PGT-M is a previous experience of failed IVF treatments. women whose IVF treatments failed in the past tended to try to conceive naturally and later, during the course of the pregnancy, perform CVS or AC. Conversely, women who previously experienced a termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to an affected fetus, and older women, preferred to undergo IVF-PGT-M procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. Hum Mol Genet. 2000 Apr 12;9(6):901-8 [PMID: 10767313]
  2. Genet Med. 2005 Oct;7(8):584-7 [PMID: 16247297]
  3. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;20(3):216-20 [PMID: 18460934]
  4. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Sep;89(9):4569-74 [PMID: 15356064]
  5. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017 Sep 12;10:290 [PMID: 28955201]
  6. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):456-65 [PMID: 17074338]
  7. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24 [PMID: 21505041]
  8. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Sep;34(9):1179-1183 [PMID: 28612309]
  9. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Mar;34(3):315-323 [PMID: 27995424]
  10. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1047-58 [PMID: 1760838]
  11. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:965839 [PMID: 26713318]
  12. Hum Reprod. 2010 Oct;25(10):2629-36 [PMID: 20713414]
  13. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Oct;21(4):560-5 [PMID: 20801083]
  14. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005 Feb;22(2):75-9 [PMID: 15844732]
  15. Prenat Diagn. 2007 Nov;27(11):991-4 [PMID: 17705235]
  16. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Apr;14(4):515-21 [PMID: 17425837]
  17. Prenat Diagn. 2011 Oct;31(10):925-31 [PMID: 21717484]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(6):992-8 [PMID: 21333433]
  19. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2185-91 [PMID: 21576079]
  20. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2005 Jun;44(5):371-81 [PMID: 15965543]
  21. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 25;9(8):e105121 [PMID: 25153074]
  22. Hum Reprod. 2008 May;23(5):1220-5 [PMID: 18310677]

MeSH Term

Adult
Cohort Studies
Decision Making
Female
Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein
Fragile X Syndrome
Genetic Testing
Heterozygote
Humans
Mutation
Pregnancy
Preimplantation Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

Chemicals

FMR1 protein, human
Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0IVF-PGT-MFMR1premutationcarriersgeneticwomenundergopregnantCVSACofferedprenataldiagnosispregnancydecisionfailedIVFamongpreferredspontaneousconceptionyearsFXSincludingpregnanciespreviousterminationduewoman'sversustreatmentsPURPOSE:detectfactorsinfluencedecision-makingregardingmodediagnosis:vitrofertilizationpreimplantationtestingmonogenicgenediseaseschorionicvillussamplingamniocentesisMETHODS:Israelpreconceptionscreeningfreechargeeverywomanreproductive≥ 70CGGrepeatshistoryoffspringhistoricalcohortstudyunderwent20112016tertiarymedicalcenterDatacollectedelectronicchartsphoneinterviewsRESULTS:Onehundredseventy-fivehigh-riskevaluated3721%decidedUsinggeneralizedestimatingequationsGEEstatisticalmethodsevenparametersfoundadvancedagesignificantlyassociatedmakingPreviouslysignificantparameterCONCLUSION:dominantfactoraffectingchooseexperienceWomenwhosepasttendedtryconceivenaturallylatercourseperformConverselypreviouslyexperiencedTOPaffectedfetusolderproceduresPreimplantationdiagnosis-decision-making

Similar Articles

Cited By