Using ddRAD-seq data to develop polymorphic microsatellite markers for an endangered yew species.

Hantao Qin, Guoqian Yang, Jim Provan, Jie Liu, Lianming Gao
Author Information
  1. Hantao Qin: Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650201, China.
  2. Guoqian Yang: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
  3. Jim Provan: Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Penglais, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA, UK.
  4. Jie Liu: Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650201, China.
  5. Lianming Gao: Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650201, China.

Abstract

Microsatellites are highly polymorphic markers which have been used in a wide range of genetic studies. In recent years, various sources of next-generation sequencing data have been used to develop new microsatellite loci, but compared with the more common shotgun genomic sequencing or transcriptome data, the potential utility of RAD-seq data for microsatellite ascertainment is comparatively under-used. In this study, we employed ddRAD-seq data to develop polymorphic microsatellite loci for the endangered yew species . Of 8,823,053 clean reads generated for ten individuals of a population, 94,851 (∼1%) contained microsatellite motifs. These corresponded to 2993 unique loci, of which 526 (∼18%) exhibited polymorphism. Of which, 237 were suitable for designing microsatellite primer pairs, and 128 loci were randomly selected for PCR validation and microsatellite screening. Out of the 128 primer pairs, 16 loci gave clear, reproducible patterns, and were then screened and characterized in 24 individuals from two populations. The total number of alleles per locus ranged from two to ten (mean = 4.875), and within-population expected heterozygosity from zero to 0.789 (mean = 0.530), indicating that these microsatellite loci will be useful for population genetics and speciation studies of . This study represents one of few examples to mine polymorphic microsatellite loci from ddRAD data.

Keywords

References

  1. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Oct;11(10):424-9 [PMID: 21237902]
  2. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 02;10(6):e0128798 [PMID: 26035838]
  3. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):89-100 [PMID: 21429104]
  4. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Sep;14(5):953-65 [PMID: 24576200]
  5. Ecol Lett. 2006 May;9(5):615-29 [PMID: 16643306]
  6. Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 1;26(3):403-4 [PMID: 20007741]
  7. Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2453-65 [PMID: 12453231]
  8. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 May 2;147(1):190-203 [PMID: 23473867]
  9. Mol Ecol. 2016 Mar;25(5):1089-105 [PMID: 26825431]
  10. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3376 [PMID: 18852878]
  11. Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jun 17;12(7):499-510 [PMID: 21681211]
  12. Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9 [PMID: 22820204]
  13. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Mar;14(3):230-8 [PMID: 9066791]
  14. Am J Bot. 2012 Feb;99(2):193-208 [PMID: 22186186]
  15. Front Plant Sci. 2016 Sep 13;7:1350 [PMID: 27679641]
  16. Mol Ecol. 2000 Oct;9(10):1599-608 [PMID: 11050555]
  17. Plant Methods. 2016 Aug 04;12:39 [PMID: 27493679]
  18. PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379 [PMID: 21573248]
  19. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6 [PMID: 21585727]
  20. Mol Ecol. 2013 Jun;22(11):3124-40 [PMID: 23701397]
  21. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jul;11(4):591-611 [PMID: 21565126]
  22. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 May;17(3):481-491 [PMID: 27488693]
  23. Mol Ecol. 2007 Nov;16(22):4684-98 [PMID: 17908214]
  24. Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Feb;18(2):233-4 [PMID: 10657137]
  25. New Phytol. 2013 Sep;199(4):1093-108 [PMID: 23718262]
  26. Am J Bot. 2011 Apr;98(4):e70-3 [PMID: 21613149]
  27. Mol Ecol. 2016 Jul;25(13):2997-3018 [PMID: 26971882]
  28. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007 Mar;10(2):130-44 [PMID: 17436548]
  29. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0142602 [PMID: 26561396]
  30. Curr Biol. 2014 Mar 17;24(6):671-6 [PMID: 24613306]
  31. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37135 [PMID: 22675423]
  32. Appl Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 16;4(6):null [PMID: 27347456]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0microsatellitelocidatapolymorphicsequencingdevelopspeciesmarkersusedstudiesstudyddRAD-seqendangeredyewtenindividualspopulationprimerpairs128twoMicrosatelliteshighlywiderangegeneticrecentyearsvarioussourcesnext-generationnewcomparedcommonshotgungenomictranscriptomepotentialutilityRAD-seqascertainmentcomparativelyunder-usedemployed8823053cleanreadsgenerated94851∼1%containedmotifscorresponded2993unique526∼18%exhibitedpolymorphism237suitabledesigningrandomlyselectedPCRvalidationscreening16gaveclearreproduciblepatternsscreenedcharacterized24populationstotalnumberallelesperlocusrangedmean = 4875within-populationexpectedheterozygosityzero0789mean = 0530indicatingwillusefulgeneticsspeciationrepresentsoneexamplesmineddRADUsingEndangeredMicrosatelliteMiddRAD-seqNext-generationTaxusflorinii

Similar Articles

Cited By