Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment.

Manuel G Calvo, Aida Gutiérrez-García, David Beltrán
Author Information
  1. Manuel G Calvo: Department of Cognitive Psychology, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205, Tenerife, Spain. mgcalvo@ull.edu.es. ORCID
  2. Aida Gutiérrez-García: Aida Gutiérrez-García, Department of Health Sciences, Universidad de Burgos, 09001, Burgos, Spain.
  3. David Beltrán: Department of Cognitive Psychology, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205, Tenerife, Spain.

Abstract

Prior research has shown that the more (or less) attractive a face is judged, the more (or less) trustworthy the person is deemed and that some common neural networks are recruited during facial attractiveness and trustworthiness evaluation. To interpret the relationship between attractiveness and trustworthiness (e.g., whether perception of personal trustworthiness may depend on perception of facial attractiveness), we investigated their relative neural processing time course. An event-related potential (ERP) paradigm was used, with localization of brain sources of the scalp neural activity. Face stimuli with a neutral, angry, happy, or surprised expression were presented in an attractiveness judgment, a trustworthiness judgment, or a control (no explicit social judgment) task. Emotional facial expression processing occurred earlier (N170 and EPN, 150-290 ms post-stimulus onset) than attractiveness and trustworthiness processing (P3b, 400-700 ms). Importantly, right-central ERP (C2, C4, C6) differences reflecting discrimination between "yes" (attractive or trustworthy) and "no" (unattractive or untrustworthy) decisions occurred at least 400 ms earlier for attractiveness than for trustworthiness, in the absence of LRP motor preparation differences. Neural source analysis indicated that facial processing brain networks (e.g., LG, FG, and IPL-extending to pSTS), also right-lateralized, were involved in the discrimination time course differences. This suggests that attractiveness impressions precede and might prime trustworthiness inferences and that the neural time course differences reflect truly facial encoding processes.

Keywords

References

  1. Exp Psychol. 2017 Jul;64(4):231-239 [PMID: 28922996]
  2. Biol Psychol. 2010 May;84(2):192-205 [PMID: 20109520]
  3. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:813870 [PMID: 21253358]
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1660-70 [PMID: 21536552]
  5. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:519-45 [PMID: 25196277]
  6. Brain Res. 2012 Jan 30;1435:81-90 [PMID: 22206927]
  7. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):1002-1017 [PMID: 28685402]
  8. Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):387-92 [PMID: 20003147]
  9. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869 [PMID: 21253357]
  10. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Jun;8(2):132-42 [PMID: 18589504]
  11. PLoS One. 2015 May 07;10(5):e0125806 [PMID: 25951138]
  12. Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):189-200 [PMID: 15222855]
  13. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Nov;145(11):1512-1529 [PMID: 27797558]
  14. Biol Psychol. 2012 Apr;90(1):23-32 [PMID: 22361274]
  15. Neurosci Lett. 2011 Jun 8;496(3):147-51 [PMID: 21457755]
  16. Emotion. 2018 Mar;18(2):181-189 [PMID: 28447825]
  17. Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2051-61 [PMID: 23880097]
  18. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 8;45(7):1438-51 [PMID: 17204295]
  19. Front Psychol. 2013 May 14;4:268 [PMID: 23717297]
  20. Biol Psychol. 2007 Sep;76(1-2):100-8 [PMID: 17681418]
  21. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):477-85 [PMID: 20601424]
  22. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):143-150 [PMID: 22686638]
  23. Psychophysiology. 1998 Jan;35(1):99-115 [PMID: 9499711]
  24. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Mar;8(3):285-99 [PMID: 22287188]
  25. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4287-303 [PMID: 26252428]
  26. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Aug;55:498-509 [PMID: 26067902]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105(32):11087-92 [PMID: 18685089]
  28. Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 27;6:1616 [PMID: 26579008]
  29. Cogn Emot. 2018 Feb 26;:1-8 [PMID: 29482469]
  30. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep;14(3):1061-76 [PMID: 24326966]
  31. Br J Psychol. 2017 May;108(2):397-415 [PMID: 27443971]
  32. J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 6;34(32):10573-81 [PMID: 25100591]
  33. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jan;9(1):63-72 [PMID: 22956674]
  34. Brain Topogr. 2001 Winter;14(2):131-7 [PMID: 11797811]
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2864-85 [PMID: 19929758]
  36. Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2524-33 [PMID: 20951215]
  37. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009 Nov;34(6):418-32 [PMID: 19949718]
  38. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:26-36 [PMID: 24406982]
  39. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;115(10):2195-222 [PMID: 15351361]
  40. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Aug 20;3:16 [PMID: 19738922]
  41. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34859 [PMID: 22514680]
  42. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233 [PMID: 10827445]
  43. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(12):1999-2008 [PMID: 27522090]
  44. Neuroimage. 2013 Jul 1;74:45-51 [PMID: 23435211]
  45. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  46. Cortex. 2015 Aug;69:131-40 [PMID: 26046623]
  47. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Oct;8(7):838-44 [PMID: 22842814]
  48. Brain Res. 2015 Feb 9;1597:108-18 [PMID: 25498983]
  49. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):487-495 [PMID: 27672176]
  50. Neuroimage. 2014 May 15;92:237-47 [PMID: 24495810]
  51. Brain Struct Funct. 2011 Jan;215(3-4):209-23 [PMID: 20978908]
  52. Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):947-957 [PMID: 26433120]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Beauty
Brain
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials
Face
Female
Humans
Judgment
Male
Social Perception
Time Factors
Trust
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attractivenesstrustworthinessfacialcourseneuralprocessingtimejudgmentdifferencesbrainsourcesexpressionmslessattractivetrustworthynetworksegperceptionpotentialERPoccurredearlierdiscriminationNeuralPriorresearchshownfacejudgedpersondeemedcommonrecruitedevaluationinterpretrelationshipwhetherpersonalmaydependinvestigatedrelativeevent-relatedparadigmusedlocalizationscalpactivityFacestimulineutralangryhappysurprisedpresentedcontrolexplicitsocialtaskEmotionalN170EPN150-290post-stimulusonsetP3b400-700Importantlyright-centralC2C4C6reflecting"yes""no"unattractiveuntrustworthydecisionsleast400absenceLRPmotorpreparationsourceanalysisindicatedLGFGIPL-extendingpSTSalsoright-lateralizedinvolvedsuggestsimpressionsprecedemightprimeinferencesreflecttrulyencodingprocessesvsAttractivenessBrainEvent-relatedFacialTimeTrustworthiness

Similar Articles

Cited By