Influence of Spinal Manipulation on Muscle Spasticity and Manual Dexterity in Participants With Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Oleh Kachmar, Anna Kushnir, Oles Matiushenko, Marko Hasiuk
Author Information
  1. Oleh Kachmar: Innovative Technologies Department, International Clinic of Rehabilitation, Truskavets, Lviv Region, Ukraine.
  2. Anna Kushnir: Innovative Technologies Department, International Clinic of Rehabilitation, Truskavets, Lviv Region, Ukraine.
  3. Oles Matiushenko: Innovative Technologies Department, International Clinic of Rehabilitation, Truskavets, Lviv Region, Ukraine.
  4. Marko Hasiuk: Innovative Technologies Department, International Clinic of Rehabilitation, Truskavets, Lviv Region, Ukraine.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effects of spinal manipulation (SM) on wrist muscle spasticity and manual dexterity in participants with cerebral palsy (CP).
METHODS: After baseline examination, 78 participants with spastic CP (7-18 years) without contractures or hyperkinetic syndrome were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The experimental group underwent SM to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, and the control group received sham SM. A second evaluation was performed 5 minutes postintervention. Wrist muscle spasticity was measured quantitatively with NeuroFlexor (Aggero MedTech AB, Solna, Sweden), a device assessing resistance to passive movements of different velocities. Between-group difference was calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Manual dexterity was evaluated by the Box and Block test.
RESULTS: In the experimental group, muscle spasticity was reduced by 2.18 newton from median 5.53 with interquartile range 8.66 to median 3.35 newton with interquartile range 7.19; the difference was statistically significant ( = .002). In the control group, reduction in spasticity was negligible. The between-group difference in change of muscle spasticity was statistically significant ( = .034). Improvement of manual dexterity was not statistically significant ( = .28).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that SM may, in the short term, help to reduce spasticity in participants with CP. Long-term effects of SM on muscle spasticity have yet to be studied.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Sep 30;210(2):169-77 [PMID: 22878176]
  2. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):797-804 [PMID: 25841562]
  3. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2009 Jun;16(2):82-9 [PMID: 19501336]
  4. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):768-76 [PMID: 22483612]
  5. Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):357-71 [PMID: 14589467]
  6. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:317047 [PMID: 25649546]
  7. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(2):156-63 [PMID: 15977320]
  8. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;51 Suppl 4:122-9 [PMID: 19740219]
  9. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Dec;15(4):299-304 [PMID: 27857638]
  10. J Nov Physiother Phys Rehabil. 2015 Sep;2(2):20-27 [PMID: 26618202]
  11. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Jul;14(3):280-6 [PMID: 20538226]
  12. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Nov-Dec;28(9):667-72 [PMID: 16326236]
  13. Musculoskeletal Care. 2016 Dec;14(4):195-205 [PMID: 26756540]
  14. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):1063-70 [PMID: 20410783]
  15. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):630-6 [PMID: 23695917]
  16. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;81(1):46-52 [PMID: 19770162]
  17. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Feb;40(2):61-70 [PMID: 28017603]
  18. J Man Manip Ther. 2014 Nov;22(4):220-9 [PMID: 25395830]
  19. J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jul;46(7):629-34 [PMID: 24850135]
  20. Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91 [PMID: 3160243]
  21. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7 [PMID: 3809245]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spasticitySMmusclegroupdexterityparticipantsCPdifferencestatisticallysignificant=effectsmanual2experimentalcontrol5testManualnewtonmedianinterquartilerangeSpinalManipulationMuscleSpasticityCerebralOBJECTIVES:aimstudyinvestigateshort-termspinalmanipulationwristcerebralpalsyMETHODS:baselineexamination78spastic7-18yearswithoutcontractureshyperkineticsyndromerandomlyallocatedgroupsunderwentcervicalthoraciclumbarspinereceivedshamsecondevaluationperformedminutespostinterventionWristmeasuredquantitativelyNeuroFlexorAggeroMedTechABSolnaSwedendeviceassessingresistancepassivemovementsdifferentvelocitiesBetween-groupcalculatedusingMann-WhitneyUevaluatedBoxBlockRESULTS:reduced1853866335719002reductionnegligiblebetween-groupchange034Improvement28CONCLUSIONS:findingssuggestmayshorttermhelpreduceLong-termyetstudiedInfluenceDexterityParticipantsPalsy:RandomizedControlledTrialPalsyMusculoskeletalManipulations

Similar Articles

Cited By