Highly Prevalent Multidrug-Resistant From Chicken and Pork Meat at Retail Markets in Guangdong, China.

Lina Zhang, Ying Fu, Zhiying Xiong, Yeben Ma, Yihuan Wei, Xiaoyun Qu, Hongxia Zhang, Jianmin Zhang, Ming Liao
Author Information
  1. Lina Zhang: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  2. Ying Fu: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  3. Zhiying Xiong: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  4. Yeben Ma: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  5. Yihuan Wei: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  6. Xiaoyun Qu: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  7. Hongxia Zhang: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  8. Jianmin Zhang: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.
  9. Ming Liao: National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou, China.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, serotype distribution, and antibiotic resistance, and to characterize the extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) producing isolates from chicken and pork meats from retail markets in Guangdong province, China. A total of 903 retail meat samples (475 chicken and 428 pork meats) were obtained from six cities (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Heyuan, Shaoguan, Foshan, and Yunfu) of Guangdong province between May 2016 and April 2017. High levels of contamination were detected in chicken (302/475, 63.6%) and pork (313/428, 73.1%). Thirty-eight serotypes were identified in 615 detected , and the serotypes varied greatly between chicken and pork samples. Agona (55/302, 18.2%), Corvallis (45/302, 14.9%), Kentucky (38/302, 12.6%), Mbandaka (32/302, 10.6%) was the dominant serotypes in chicken samples. However, Typhimurium (78/313, 24.9%), Rissen (67/313, 24.1%), Derby (66/313, 21.1%), and London (48, 15.3%) were the most common in pork samples. High rates of antibiotic resistance were found to sulfisoxazole (468/615, 76.1%), tetracycline (463/615, 75.3%), ampicillin (295/615, 48.0%), and ofloxacin (275/615, 44.7%). Notably, antimicrobial susceptibility tests identified resistance to polymyxin B (12/615, 2.0%) and imipenem (3/615, 0.5%). Multidrug-resistance (MDR) was detected in isolated from chicken (245/302, 81.1%) and pork (229/313, 73.2%). The resistance rate of different serotypes varied widely. Especially, isolates such as Typhimurium, Agona, orvallis and Kentucky exhibited highly resistance to antibiotics. The MDR rate of isolates from chicken was significantly higher than that from pork isolates ( < 0.05). Twenty-one isolates were identified as ESBLs-producing, covering six serotypes and displaying different pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) genotypes. was the dominant ESBLs gene (9/21, 42.9%), followed by (5/21, 23.8%). This study indicated that was widespread in chicken and pork from retail markets in Guangdong province and the isolates showed high multidrug-resistance, especially the known multidrug-resistant serotypes. Therefore, it is important to focus on serotypes and strengthen the long-term monitoring of MDR serotypes in animal-derived foods.

Keywords

References

  1. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2015 Jan;89(1):46-52 [PMID: 26548296]
  2. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 09;10(12):e0144532 [PMID: 26650239]
  3. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Nov 7;236:115-22 [PMID: 27479779]
  4. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0143326 [PMID: 26606146]
  5. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 12;15:53 [PMID: 25881319]
  6. Front Microbiol. 2017 Jun 21;8:1049 [PMID: 28680418]
  7. Vet Microbiol. 2006 Mar 10;113(1-2):153-8 [PMID: 16337754]
  8. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15;143(3):230-4 [PMID: 20797804]
  9. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014 Feb;11(2):126-32 [PMID: 24134666]
  10. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012 Apr;9(4):305-12 [PMID: 22356574]
  11. J Food Prot. 2015 Nov;78(11):1932-7 [PMID: 26555514]
  12. Vet Microbiol. 2002 May 1;86(3):203-12 [PMID: 11900955]
  13. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2061-7 [PMID: 9230382]
  14. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):7-15 [PMID: 21192848]
  15. J AOAC Int. 2006 Mar-Apr;89(2):553-9 [PMID: 16640306]
  16. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007 Oct;51(1):8-13 [PMID: 17666075]
  17. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Dec;68(12):2954-6 [PMID: 23818284]
  18. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Apr 15;163(1):14-8 [PMID: 23474653]
  19. Genome Announc. 2014 May 08;2(3):null [PMID: 24812224]
  20. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Jun 16;180:30-8 [PMID: 24786550]
  21. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:1103-1109 [PMID: 26871556]
  22. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;19(8):1239-44 [PMID: 23876503]
  23. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Oct 29;9(10):1161-5 [PMID: 26517493]
  24. J Food Prot. 2014 Feb;77(2):236-45 [PMID: 24490917]
  25. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35(2):81-108 [PMID: 19514910]
  26. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jun 1;34 Suppl 3:S123-5 [PMID: 11988882]
  27. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016 Apr;92(4):fiw013 [PMID: 26850161]
  28. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006 Spring;3(1):59-67 [PMID: 16602980]
  29. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 May 15;156(2):147-51 [PMID: 22497836]
  30. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015 Sep;12(9):759-65 [PMID: 26204443]
  31. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017 May 2;248:72-81 [PMID: 28288398]
  32. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;12(3):381-8 [PMID: 16704773]
  33. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006 May;53(4):194-6 [PMID: 16629988]
  34. Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Jul;142(7):1403-10 [PMID: 24625654]
  35. Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Oct;144(14):2989-2999 [PMID: 27443305]
  36. Res Microbiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;161(1):26-9 [PMID: 19840847]
  37. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Aug 3;206:7-16 [PMID: 25912312]
  38. Gut Pathog. 2015 Dec 23;7:34 [PMID: 26705426]
  39. Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Apr;142(4):826-32 [PMID: 23842508]
  40. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2016 Nov;34(9):544-550 [PMID: 26790900]
  41. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Jun 30;141(1-2):63-72 [PMID: 20493570]
  42. Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 31;8:2106 [PMID: 29163400]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0chickenporkserotypesresistanceisolates1%retailGuangdongsamplesantibioticESBLsprovincedetected6%identified9%MDRstudyprevalencemeatsmarketsChinameatsixHigh73variedAgona2%KentuckydominantTyphimurium24483%0%0ratedifferentPFGEaimedinvestigateserotypedistributioncharacterizeextendedspectrumβ-lactamasesproducingtotal903475428obtainedcitiesGuangzhouShenzhenHeyuanShaoguanFoshanYunfuMay2016April2017levelscontamination302/47563313/428Thirty-eight615greatly55/30218Corvallis45/3021438/30212Mbandaka32/30210However78/313Rissen67/313Derby66/31321London15commonratesfoundsulfisoxazole468/61576tetracycline463/61575ampicillin295/615ofloxacin275/615447%NotablyantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestspolymyxinB12/6152imipenem3/6155%Multidrug-resistanceisolated245/30281229/313widelyEspeciallyorvallisexhibitedhighlyantibioticssignificantlyhigher<05Twenty-oneESBLs-producingcoveringdisplayingpulsefieldgelelectrophoresisgenotypesgene9/2142followed5/21238%indicatedwidespreadshowedhighmultidrug-resistanceespeciallyknownmultidrug-resistantThereforeimportantfocusstrengthenlong-termmonitoringanimal-derivedfoodsHighlyPrevalentMultidrug-ResistantChickenPorkMeatRetailMarketsSalmonella

Similar Articles

Cited By