A nested compartmental model to assess the efficacy of paratuberculosis control measures on U.S. dairy farms.

Malinee Konboon, Majid Bani-Yaghoub, Patrick O Pithua, Noah Rhee, Sharif S Aly
Author Information
  1. Malinee Konboon: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
  2. Majid Bani-Yaghoub: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
  3. Patrick O Pithua: Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America. ORCID
  4. Noah Rhee: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
  5. Sharif S Aly: Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Tulare, California, United States of America. ORCID

Abstract

Paratuberculosis, also known as Johne's disease (JD), is a chronic contagious disease, caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). The disease is incurable, fatal and causes economic losses estimated to exceed 200 million dollars to the U.S. dairy industry annually. Several preventive and control measures have been recommended; however, only a few of these measures have been validated empirically. Using a nested compartmental (NC) modeling approach, the main objective of this research was to identify the best combination of control and preventive measures that minimizes the prevalence and incidence of JD and the risk of MAP occurrence in a dairy herd. The NC model employs both MAP transmission estimates and data on pen movement of cattle on a dairy to quantify the effectiveness of control and preventive measures. To obtain reasonable ranges of parameter values for between-pen movements, the NC model was fitted to the movement data of four typical California dairy farms. Using the estimated ranges of the movement parameters and those of JD from previous research, the basic reproduction number was calculated to measure the risk of MAP occurrence in each pen environment as well as the entire dairy. Although the interventions evaluated by the NC model were shown to reduce the infection, no single measure alone was capable of eradicating the infection. The numerical simulations suggest that a combination of test and cull with more frequent manure removal is the most effective method in reducing incidence, prevalence and the risk of MAP occurrence. Other control measures such as limiting calf-adult cow contacts, raising calves in a disease-free herd or colostrum management were less effective.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 22;8(10):e76636 [PMID: 24167547]
  2. Am J Vet Res. 1995 Oct;56(10):1322-4 [PMID: 8928949]
  3. Am J Vet Res. 1956 Jul;17(64):549-51 [PMID: 13340126]
  4. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Dec 15;233(12):1852-8 [PMID: 19072597]
  5. Vet Microbiol. 2013 Jun 28;164(3-4):383-6 [PMID: 23517764]
  6. Prev Vet Med. 2016 Feb 1;124:102-5 [PMID: 26754926]
  7. Am J Vet Res. 1992 Apr;53(4):477-80 [PMID: 1586015]
  8. Vet J. 2009 Jan;179(1):60-9 [PMID: 17928247]
  9. J Dairy Sci. 2015 Mar;98(3):1805-14 [PMID: 25597977]
  10. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2001 Apr;48(3):185-95 [PMID: 11393814]
  11. Vet Microbiol. 2004 Nov 15;103(3-4):209-17 [PMID: 15504592]
  12. Prev Vet Med. 2006 Jul 17;75(1-2):92-122 [PMID: 16564101]
  13. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 May 1;234(9):1167-76 [PMID: 19405889]
  14. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Aug 1;227(3):450-4 [PMID: 16121613]
  15. J Dairy Sci. 2011 Sep;94(9):4669-75 [PMID: 21854939]
  16. Prev Vet Med. 2015 Feb 1;118(2-3):215-25 [PMID: 25583453]
  17. J Dairy Sci. 2006 Dec;89(12):4557-66 [PMID: 17106087]
  18. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Feb 1;108(2-3):148-58 [PMID: 22921715]
  19. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1996 Jul;12(2):305-12 [PMID: 8828107]
  20. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Jul 1;110(3-4):335-45 [PMID: 23419983]
  21. J Biol Dyn. 2012;6:923-40 [PMID: 22881277]
  22. Epidemiol Infect. 2012 Mar;140(3):542-53 [PMID: 21676360]
  23. Vet Res. 2015 Jun 19;46:69 [PMID: 26091672]
  24. Vet Microbiol. 2005 May 20;107(3-4):257-63 [PMID: 15863285]
  25. Epidemiol Infect. 2014 May;142(5):1034-49 [PMID: 23920341]
  26. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1977 Jun 15;102(12):739-47 [PMID: 867405]
  27. Vet Res. 2006 Jul-Aug;37(4):593-606 [PMID: 16701065]
  28. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014 Mar 1;244(5):582-7 [PMID: 24548233]
  29. J Theor Biol. 2008 Sep 7;254(1):135-46 [PMID: 18573505]
  30. Am J Vet Res. 2013 Oct;74(10):1304-10 [PMID: 24066914]
  31. Aust Vet J. 1981 Feb;57(2):61-5 [PMID: 7259645]
  32. Math Biosci. 2002 Nov-Dec;180:29-48 [PMID: 12387915]
  33. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2012 Sep;24(5):821-32 [PMID: 22807510]
  34. J Vet Intern Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;26(6):1239-50 [PMID: 23106497]
  35. Can Vet J. 2006 Sep;47(9):874-82 [PMID: 17017652]
  36. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Jan 1;238(1):94-100 [PMID: 21194328]
  37. Vaccine. 2008 May 2;26(19):2433-42 [PMID: 18423805]
  38. Aust Vet J. 2001 Apr;79(4):267-78 [PMID: 11349414]

MeSH Term

Animals
California
Cattle
Cattle Diseases
Dairying
Farmers
Farms
Female
Infection Control
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis
Paratuberculosis
Pregnancy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dairymeasuresMAPcontrolNCmodeldiseaseJDpreventiveriskoccurrencemovementparatuberculosisestimatedUSUsingnestedcompartmentalresearchcombinationprevalenceincidenceherddatapenrangesfarmsmeasureinfectioneffectiveParatuberculosisalsoknownJohne'schroniccontagiouscausedMycobacteriumaviumsubspincurablefatalcauseseconomiclossesexceed200milliondollarsindustryannuallySeveralrecommendedhowevervalidatedempiricallymodelingapproachmainobjectiveidentifybestminimizesemploystransmissionestimatescattlequantifyeffectivenessobtainreasonableparametervaluesbetween-penmovementsfittedfourtypicalCaliforniaparameterspreviousbasicreproductionnumbercalculatedenvironmentwellentireAlthoughinterventionsevaluatedshownreducesinglealonecapableeradicatingnumericalsimulationssuggesttestcullfrequentmanureremovalmethodreducinglimitingcalf-adultcowcontactsraisingcalvesdisease-freecolostrummanagementlessassessefficacy

Similar Articles

Cited By