Purchasers' deliberations on psychosocial needs within the process of allocating healthcare services for older home-dwelling persons with dementia: a qualitative study.

Anette Hansen, Solveig Hauge, Ragnhild Hellesø, Ådel Bergland
Author Information
  1. Anette Hansen: Department of Nursing Science, University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Postbox 235, 3603, Kongsberg, Norway. anette.hansen@usn.no. ORCID
  2. Solveig Hauge: Department of Nursing and Health Sciences and Centre for Care Research, University of South-Eastern Norway, Postbox 235, 3603, Kongsberg, Norway.
  3. Ragnhild Hellesø: Institute of Health and Society, Department of Nursing Science, University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Postbox 1130 Blindern,, 0318, OSLO, Norway.
  4. Ådel Bergland: Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Lovisenberggaten 15b, 0456, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meeting psychosocial needs is a significant component of quality dementia care. To enable persons with dementia to live at home for as long as possible, a community healthcare service offering care where physical, social, psychological, cultural and spiritual needs are met, is recommended. A comprehensive allocation process is required to allocate individually tailored healthcare services. However, the allocation process for older home-dwelling persons with dementia, specifically for services to safeguard psychosocial needs, remains largely unexplored. Accordingly, this study aims to explore purchasers' deliberations on psychosocial needs during the process of allocating healthcare services to older home-dwelling persons with dementia.
METHODS: The study had a descriptive design with a qualitative approach. The primary data source was focus group interviews with purchasers who assess and allocate healthcare services. The interview data were supplemented by a review of administrative decisions made by the purchasers. Data from the focus group interviews were analysed using a descriptive and interpretive approach. Content analysis of the administrative decisions was conducted.
RESULTS: The purchasers described the allocation process as challenging. The following four themes reflect the complexity of the allocation process: (i) an unfamiliar and unclear concept; (ii) a hierarchy of needs; (iii) an adjusting allocation process; (iv) a challenging documentation of administrative decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: The purchasers viewed a comprehensive allocation process as important. However, a web of different interplaying aspects prevented the purchasers from conducting a comprehensive need-led allocation process. Insufficient assessment or allocation threatens the adequate safeguarding of the psychosocial needs of persons with dementia. Having varied and sufficient services to allocate is of great importance, but is not sufficient. Psychosocial needs must be better incorporated as a significant element throughout the entire allocation process.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):211 [PMID: 28893181]
  2. Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Nov;9(6):414-28 [PMID: 11846821]
  3. BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 16;8:239 [PMID: 18631374]
  4. Scand J Public Health. 2012 Dec;40(8):795-805 [PMID: 23221918]
  5. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(3):378-90 [PMID: 22250961]
  6. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Apr;28(4):621-30 [PMID: 26652662]
  7. Nurs Ethics. 2013 May;20(3):263-72 [PMID: 23295638]
  8. Health Care Women Int. 1992 Jul-Sep;13(3):313-21 [PMID: 1399871]
  9. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Sep;47(5):407-16 [PMID: 26255994]
  10. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Apr;7(4):362-7 [PMID: 18339351]
  11. Med Decis Making. 2008 May-Jun;28(3):394-410 [PMID: 18480042]
  12. Glob J Health Sci. 2013 May 22;5(5):31-40 [PMID: 23985104]
  13. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):414-21 [PMID: 22891954]
  14. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Jun;22(4):607-17 [PMID: 20214844]
  15. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Oct;26(10):1603-18 [PMID: 24933479]
  16. Scand J Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;:1403494818755600 [PMID: 29409432]
  17. Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Jan;14(1):26-36 [PMID: 16324185]
  18. J Adv Nurs. 2015 Feb;71(2):359-69 [PMID: 25092229]
  19. Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):283-91 [PMID: 22356449]
  20. J Clin Nurs. 2011 May;20(9-10):1445-53 [PMID: 21366740]
  21. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40 [PMID: 10940958]
  22. Health Soc Care Community. 2002 May;10(3):168-78 [PMID: 12121253]
  23. Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):931-57 [PMID: 25181988]
  24. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Mar;26(3):383-91 [PMID: 24252377]

Grants

  1. 13/0033/Norsk Sykepleierforbund

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Community Health Services
Consumer Behavior
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Dementia
Female
Focus Groups
Health Care Rationing
Home Care Services
Humans
Middle Aged
Needs Assessment
Norway
Qualitative Research
Quality of Health Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0needsallocationprocessserviceshealthcarepsychosocialdementiapersonspurchaserscarecomprehensiveallocateolderhome-dwellingstudyadministrativedecisionssignificantHoweverdeliberationsallocatingdescriptivequalitativeapproachdatafocusgroupinterviewschallengingassessmentsufficientPsychosocialBACKGROUND:MeetingcomponentqualityenablelivehomelongpossiblecommunityserviceofferingphysicalsocialpsychologicalculturalspiritualmetrecommendedrequiredindividuallytailoredspecificallysafeguardremainslargelyunexploredAccordinglyaimsexplorepurchasers'METHODS:designprimarysourceassessinterviewsupplementedreviewmadeDataanalysedusinginterpretiveContentanalysisconductedRESULTS:describedfollowingfourthemesreflectcomplexityprocess:unfamiliarunclearconceptiihierarchyiiiadjustingivdocumentationCONCLUSIONS:viewedimportantwebdifferentinterplayingaspectspreventedconductingneed-ledInsufficientthreatensadequatesafeguardingvariedgreatimportancemustbetterincorporatedelementthroughoutentirePurchasers'withindementia:AllocationAlzheimer’sdiseaseCommunityDementiaHealthcareHomePurchasers

Similar Articles

Cited By