Irritant Contact Dermatitis.

Sonia N Bains, Pembroke Nash, Luz Fonacier
Author Information
  1. Sonia N Bains: Allergy Partners of Raleigh, 10880 Durant Rd, Ste 200, Raleigh, NC, 27614, USA. snbains@allergypartners.com. ORCID
  2. Pembroke Nash: Allergy Partners of Raleigh, 10880 Durant Rd, Ste 200, Raleigh, NC, 27614, USA.
  3. Luz Fonacier: State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Abstract

Contact dermatitis accounts for 95% of occupational skin disorders. Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is often caused by cumulative exposure to weak irritants, accounting for 80% of all cases of contact dermatitis. ICD can co-exist with atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Patients with AD and ACD may have a lower inflammatory threshold for developing ICD. Therefore, it needs to be distinguished from lesions of AD and ACD. ICD Patients report stinging and burning in excess of pruritus. Pruritus is classically reported by patients with AD and ACD. ICD lesions are typically well-demarcated unlike AD and ACD. ICD is diagnosed by exclusion. Patients undergo testing to rule out type I and type IV hypersensitivity. Negative results suggest a diagnosis of ICD. Management consists of irritant identification and avoidance with regular emollient use. Although ICD is more common in certain occupations, genetics and environment play significant roles in its development.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jul;47(7):837-41 [PMID: 10404928]
  2. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1999 Nov;72(8):496-506 [PMID: 10592001]
  3. Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Apr;44(4):201-6 [PMID: 11260234]
  4. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2002 Mar;27(2):138-46 [PMID: 11952708]
  5. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Aug;147(2):270-5 [PMID: 12174098]
  6. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003 Jun;76(5):339-46 [PMID: 12827369]
  7. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1963 Apr;2:175-7 [PMID: 13947745]
  8. Br J Dermatol. 2003 Dec;149(6):1165-71 [PMID: 14674893]
  9. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(4):302-13 [PMID: 15327475]
  10. Contact Dermatitis. 2005 Jan;52(1):54 [PMID: 15701139]
  11. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jul;153(1):125-31 [PMID: 16029337]
  12. Nat Genet. 2006 Apr;38(4):441-6 [PMID: 16550169]
  13. Dermatitis. 2006 Sep;17(3):123-7 [PMID: 16956463]
  14. J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Jul;127(7):1632-40 [PMID: 17301829]
  15. J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Jul;128(7):1719-27 [PMID: 18239613]
  16. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2002 Oct;24(5):281-5 [PMID: 18498521]
  17. Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Aug;59(2):120-2 [PMID: 18759883]
  18. Dermatitis. 2009 Mar-Apr;20(2):63-78 [PMID: 19426612]
  19. Eur J Dermatol. 2009 Jul-Aug;19(4):325-32 [PMID: 19447733]
  20. Exp Dermatol. 2009 Dec;18(12):1036-43 [PMID: 19558500]
  21. Dermatol Clin. 2009 Jul;27(3):365-83, vii-viii [PMID: 19580930]
  22. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Sep;124(3):496-506, 506.e1-6 [PMID: 19733297]
  23. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S138-49 [PMID: 19932921]
  24. Contact Dermatitis. 2010 May;62(5):279-88 [PMID: 20536475]
  25. Clin Dermatol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):31-6 [PMID: 21146729]
  26. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Apr;127(4):954-64.e1-4 [PMID: 21388663]
  27. Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Jul;65(1):3-12 [PMID: 21658053]
  28. Skinmed. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):144-50 [PMID: 22783559]
  29. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):300-13 [PMID: 22939651]
  30. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):577-9 [PMID: 23265860]
  31. Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Dec;71(6):364-70 [PMID: 25302958]
  32. J Immunol. 1987 Oct 15;139(8):2551-5 [PMID: 3498764]
  33. Arch Dermatol Res. 1986;278(6):465-9 [PMID: 3789805]
  34. J Invest Dermatol. 1971 Apr;56(4):259-71 [PMID: 5556516]
  35. Cutis. 1980 Aug;26(2):136-7, 141-2, 147-8 [PMID: 6996939]
  36. Br J Dermatol. 1995 Nov;133(5):679-85 [PMID: 8555016]
  37. Contact Dermatitis. 1996 Feb;34(2):121-4 [PMID: 8681540]
  38. Acta Derm Venereol. 1997 Mar;77(2):102-4 [PMID: 9111817]
  39. Br J Dermatol. 1998 Feb;138(2):266-72 [PMID: 9602872]
  40. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 1998 Aug;3(2):121-7 [PMID: 9734825]

MeSH Term

Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
Dermatitis, Irritant
Diagnosis, Differential
Disease Management
Disease Susceptibility
Humans
Patch Tests
Phenotype
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Symptom Assessment

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ICDdermatitisACDcontactADContactIrritantPatientsskinlesionstestingtypeaccounts95%occupationaldisordersoftencausedcumulativeexposureweakirritantsaccounting80%casescanco-existatopicallergicmaylowerinflammatorythresholddevelopingThereforeneedsdistinguishedreportstingingburningexcesspruritusPruritusclassicallyreportedpatientstypicallywell-demarcatedunlikediagnosedexclusionundergoruleIVhypersensitivityNegativeresultssuggestdiagnosisManagementconsistsirritantidentificationavoidanceregularemollientuseAlthoughcommoncertainoccupationsgeneticsenvironmentplaysignificantrolesdevelopmentDermatitisAllergicOccupationaldiseasePatch

Similar Articles

Cited By