Inter-subject Similarity Guided Brain Network Modeling for MCI Diagnosis.

Yu Zhang, Han Zhang, Xiaobo Chen, Mingxia Liu, Xiaofeng Zhu, Dinggang Shen
Author Information
  1. Yu Zhang: Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
  2. Han Zhang: Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
  3. Xiaobo Chen: Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
  4. Mingxia Liu: Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
  5. Xiaofeng Zhu: Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
  6. Dinggang Shen: Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Abstract

Sparse representation-based brain network modeling, although popular, often results in relatively large inter-subject variability in network structures. This inevitably makes it difficult for inter-subject comparison, thus eventually deteriorating the generalization capability of personalized disease diagnosis. Accordingly, group sparse representation has been proposed to alleviate such limitation by jointly estimating connectivity weights for all subjects. However, the constructed brain networks based on this method often fail in providing satisfactory separability between the subjects from (e.g., patients . normal controls), which will also affect the performance of computer-aided disease diagnosis. Based on the hypothesis that subjects from the same group should have larger similarity in their functional connectivity (FC) patterns than subjects from other groups, we propose an "inter-subject FC similarity-guided" group sparse network modeling method. In this method, we explicitly include the inter-subject FC similarity as a constraint to conduct group-wise FC network modeling, while retaining sufficient between-group differences in the resultant FC networks. This improves the separability of brain functional networks between different groups, thus facilitating better personalized brain disease diagnosis. Specifically, the inter-subject FC similarity is roughly estimated by comparing the Pearson's correlation based FC patterns of each brain region to other regions for each pair of the subjects. Then, this is implemented as an additional weighting term to ensure the adequate inter-subject FC differences between the subjects from different groups. Of note, our method retains the group sparsity constraint to ensure the overall consistency of the resultant individual brain networks. Experimental results show that our method achieves a balanced trade-off by generating the individually consistent FC networks, effectively maintaining the necessary group difference, thereby significantly improving connectomics-based diagnosis for mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

References

  1. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 May;38(5):2370-2383 [PMID: 28150897]
  2. Lancet. 2006 Apr 15;367(9518):1262-70 [PMID: 16631882]
  3. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):1866-72 [PMID: 22936095]
  4. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Mar;21(2):233-43 [PMID: 23476005]
  5. Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:91-105 [PMID: 24911377]
  6. Neuroinformatics. 2015 Jul;13(3):277-95 [PMID: 25501275]
  7. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Mar;9(2):208-45 [PMID: 23507120]
  8. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6530 [PMID: 28747782]
  9. Med Image Anal. 2017 May;38:205-214 [PMID: 26674971]
  10. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 May;36(5):1847-65 [PMID: 25624081]
  11. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Apr;35(4):1630-41 [PMID: 23616377]
  12. Brain Struct Funct. 2014 Mar;219(2):641-56 [PMID: 23468090]
  13. Neuroinformatics. 2017 Jul;15(3):271-284 [PMID: 28555371]
  14. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Sep;37(9):3282-96 [PMID: 27144538]
  15. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2016 Nov;27(11):2256-2267 [PMID: 26415189]
  16. Int J Neural Syst. 2014 Feb;24(1):1450003 [PMID: 24344691]
  17. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 May;30(5):1154-65 [PMID: 21478072]
  18. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2017 Jun;28(6):1263-1275 [PMID: 26955053]

Grants

  1. R01 EB008374/NIBIB NIH HHS
  2. R01 EB006733/NIBIB NIH HHS
  3. R01 EB022880/NIBIB NIH HHS
  4. R01 AG041721/NIA NIH HHS
  5. R01 AG042599/NIA NIH HHS
  6. R01 EB009634/NIBIB NIH HHS
  7. K01 MH107815/NIMH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FCbrainsubjectsinter-subjectgroupnetworksmethodnetworkdiagnosismodelingdiseasesimilaritygroupsoftenresultsthuspersonalizedsparseconnectivitybasedseparabilityfunctionalpatternsconstraintdifferencesresultantdifferentensureMCISparserepresentation-basedalthoughpopularrelativelylargevariabilitystructuresinevitablymakesdifficultcomparisoneventuallydeterioratinggeneralizationcapabilityAccordinglyrepresentationproposedalleviatelimitationjointlyestimatingweightsHoweverconstructedfailprovidingsatisfactoryegpatientsnormalcontrolswillalsoaffectperformancecomputer-aidedBasedhypothesislargerpropose"inter-subjectsimilarity-guided"explicitlyincludeconductgroup-wiseretainingsufficientbetween-groupimprovesfacilitatingbetterSpecificallyroughlyestimatedcomparingPearson'scorrelationregionregionspairimplementedadditionalweightingtermadequatenoteretainssparsityoverallconsistencyindividualExperimentalshowachievesbalancedtrade-offgeneratingindividuallyconsistenteffectivelymaintainingnecessarydifferencetherebysignificantlyimprovingconnectomics-basedmildcognitiveimpairmentInter-subjectSimilarityGuidedBrainNetworkModelingDiagnosis

Similar Articles

Cited By