Effort and performance in a cooperative activity are boosted by perception of a partner's effort.

Matthew Chennells, John Michael
Author Information
  1. Matthew Chennells: Philosophy Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK and Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary. m.chennells@warwick.ac.uk.
  2. John Michael: Philosophy Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK and Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.

Abstract

In everyday life, people must often determine how much time and effort to allocate to cooperative activities. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that the perception of others' effort investment in a cooperative activity may elicit a sense of commitment, leading people to allocate more time and effort to the activity themselves. We developed an effortful task in which participants were required to move an increasingly difficult bar slider on a screen while simultaneously reacting to the appearance of virtual coins and earn points to share between themselves and their partner. This design allowed us to operationalize commitment in terms of participants' investment of time and effort. Crucially, the cooperative activity could only be performed after a partner had completed a complementary activity which we manipulated to be either easy (Low Effort condition) or difficult (High Effort condition). Our results revealed participants invested more effort, persisted longer and performed better in the High Effort condition, i.e. when they perceived their partner to have invested more effort. These results support the hypothesis that the perception of a partner's effort boosts one's own sense of commitment to a cooperative activity, and consequently also one's willingness to invest time and effort.

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60 [PMID: 19897823]
  2. Nat Neurosci. 2015 May;18(5):760-6 [PMID: 25849988]
  3. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:575-99 [PMID: 25061670]
  4. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Aug;5(8):e1000468 [PMID: 19680426]
  5. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1421-9 [PMID: 18364318]
  6. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100 [PMID: 10945922]
  7. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:83-113 [PMID: 25251491]
  8. Neural Netw. 2010 Oct-Nov;23(8-9):998-1003 [PMID: 20598504]
  9. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 20;5:16880 [PMID: 26586084]
  10. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jul;1(7):0131 [PMID: 28819649]
  11. Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):631-41 [PMID: 21455618]
  12. Cognition. 2018 May;174:37-42 [PMID: 29407604]
  13. J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15894-902 [PMID: 24089495]
  14. Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 05;6:1968 [PMID: 26779080]
  15. J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):415-32 [PMID: 17305808]
  16. Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):573-7 [PMID: 9634232]
  17. Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1297-300 [PMID: 16513985]
  18. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2663-74 [PMID: 20679110]
  19. Sci Am. 2012 Jul;307(1):34-9 [PMID: 22779269]

Grants

  1. 679092/European Research Council

MeSH Term

Adult
Cooperative Behavior
Games, Experimental
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Memory, Short-Term
Physical Exertion
Reward
Social Perception
Theory of Mind

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effortactivitycooperativetimeEffortperceptioncommitmentpartnerconditionpeopleallocatehypothesisinvestmentsenseparticipantsdifficultperformedHighresultsinvestedpartner'sone'severydaylifemustoftendeterminemuchactivitiescurrentstudytestedothers'mayelicitleadingdevelopedeffortfultaskrequiredmoveincreasinglybarsliderscreensimultaneouslyreactingappearancevirtualcoinsearnpointssharedesignallowedusoperationalizetermsparticipants'CruciallycompletedcomplementarymanipulatedeithereasyLowrevealedpersistedlongerbetterieperceivedsupportboostsconsequentlyalsowillingnessinvestperformanceboosted

Similar Articles

Cited By