Effect of adherence to growth hormone treatment on 0-2 year catch-up growth in children with growth hormone deficiency.

Paula van Dommelen, Ekaterina Koledova, Jan M Wit
Author Information
  1. Paula van Dommelen: Department of Child Health, TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Ekaterina Koledova: Global Medical, Safety & CMO, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
  3. Jan M Wit: Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantifying the association between adherence and the growth response to growth hormone (GH) treatment is hampered by suboptimal methods of measuring adherence, confounders associated with the growth response, and restriction of the outcome parameters to yearly growth velocities.
AIM: To investigate the effect of adherence on the two-year growth response to GH treatment in prepubertal children with idiopathic isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD) participating in the easypod connect observational study (ECOS), a 5-year, Phase IV open-label study to continuously assess real-world adherence via the easypod electronic drug-delivery device.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outcome measures were change in height standard deviation score (ΔHSDS), index of responsiveness (IoR), and parameters of two catch-up growth (CUG) curve functions (monomolecular growth curve and second degree polynomial) with adj-HSDS (HSDS minus Target height (TH) SDS) as dependent variable. Inclusion criteria were GHD, naïve to GH treatment, known TH, age <10y in girls and <12y in boys, ≥3 measurements, HSDS <-2 at start, complete data on growth and adherence in the first and second year. Linear regression analyses were performed to test the association between adherence (continuous and high vs. low) and the outcome measures, also adjusted for potential clinical confounders (age at start, adj-HSDS at start, birth weight SDS, gestational age (<37 weeks vs ≥37 weeks), GH dose, GH max (n = 58)). The formula of IoR already adjusts for confounders.
RESULTS: In total, 95 patients complied with the inclusion criteria. The strongest associations were found between high adherence in the second year (≥91% as cut-off value) and IoR 2y (+0.62), and average adherence and high adherence (≥78%) in the first two years and ΔHSDS 0-2y (+0.11 SD per 1 injection/week, and +0.34 SD for high vs. low adherence).
CONCLUSION: Suboptimal adherence negatively affected the growth response in the first two years of GH treatment.

References

  1. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2016 Feb;26:32-5 [PMID: 26774403]
  2. Pediatr Res. 2000 Oct;48(4):475-84 [PMID: 11004238]
  3. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;79(5):257-70 [PMID: 23735882]
  4. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001 Jan;144(1):13-20 [PMID: 11174832]
  5. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jan 26;31(1):13-20 [PMID: 29216008]
  6. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jul;23(7):1649-55 [PMID: 17559757]
  7. Endocr Pract. 2014 Jan;20(1):46-51 [PMID: 24013997]
  8. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006 Apr;450:76-85 [PMID: 16817681]
  9. Horm Res. 2003;59(4):180-3 [PMID: 12649571]
  10. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Dec;97(12):1698-706 [PMID: 18976357]
  11. Endocr Connect. 2018 Aug;7(8):914-923 [PMID: 29976785]
  12. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;75(5):335-45 [PMID: 21228552]
  13. PLoS One. 2011 Jan 31;6(1):e16223 [PMID: 21305004]
  14. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Sep;82(9):2889-98 [PMID: 9284715]
  15. Acta Paediatr. 1994 Oct;83(10):1097-9 [PMID: 7841713]
  16. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Apr;84(4):1174-83 [PMID: 10199749]
  17. Horm Res Paediatr. 2014;81(5):331-5 [PMID: 24714410]
  18. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:547-53 [PMID: 22927747]
  19. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Feb;93(2):147-8 [PMID: 17768149]
  20. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2008 Dec;69(6):511-6 [PMID: 18589398]
  21. Horm Res. 2002;57 Suppl 2:66-70 [PMID: 12065931]
  22. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2012 Dec-2013 Jan;10(2):199-208 [PMID: 23539831]
  23. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 10;13(1):e30 [PMID: 21393123]
  24. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;79(4):189-96 [PMID: 23635797]

MeSH Term

Child
Female
Growth and Development
Human Growth Hormone
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Medication Adherence

Chemicals

Human Growth Hormone

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0growthadherenceGHtreatmentresponsehormonehighconfoundersIoRtwosecondagestartfirstyearvs+0associationoutcomeparameterschildrendeficiencyGHDeasypodstudymeasuresheightΔHSDScatch-upcurveadj-HSDSHSDSTHSDScriterialowweeksyearsSDBACKGROUND:QuantifyinghamperedsuboptimalmethodsmeasuringassociatedrestrictionyearlyvelocitiesAIM:investigateeffecttwo-yearprepubertalidiopathicisolatedparticipatingconnectobservationalECOS5-yearPhaseIVopen-labelcontinuouslyassessreal-worldviaelectronicdrug-deliverydevicePATIENTSANDMETHODS:OutcomechangestandarddeviationscoreindexresponsivenessCUGfunctionsmonomoleculardegreepolynomialminusTargetdependentvariableInclusionnaïveknown<10ygirls<12yboys≥3measurements<-2completedataLinearregressionanalysesperformedtestcontinuousalsoadjustedpotentialclinicalbirthweightgestational<37≥37dosemaxn=58formulaalreadyadjustsRESULTS:total95patientscompliedinclusionstrongestassociationsfound≥91%cut-offvalue2y62average≥78%0-2y11per1injection/week34CONCLUSION:SuboptimalnegativelyaffectedEffect0-2

Similar Articles

Cited By