At face value: Psychological outcomes differ for real vs. computer-generated multiracial faces.

Sarah E Gaither, Jacqueline M Chen, Kristin Pauker, Samuel R Sommers
Author Information
  1. Sarah E Gaither: Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University , Durham , USA.
  2. Jacqueline M Chen: Psychology Department, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , USA.
  3. Kristin Pauker: Psychology Department, University of Hawaii at Manoa , Honolulu , USA.
  4. Samuel R Sommers: Psychology Department, Tufts University , Medford , USA.

Abstract

Multiracial research emphasizes hypodescent categorizations and relies on computer-generated stimuli. Four experiments showed that real biracial faces in a 2-Choice categorization task (White, Black) elicited hypodescent more than computer-generated faces. Additionally, Experiment 2 showed a 2-Choice categorization task with real biracial faces increased racial essentialism more than a 3-Choice categorization task. Experiment 3 showed that mere exposure to real biracial faces did not increase essentialism. Finally, Experiments 4a and 4b replicated hypodescent outcomes when comparing real biracial faces to computer-generated versions of those same faces. In sum, these findings initiate a discussion surrounding the methodology of multiracial categorizations.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Facial Recognition
Female
Humans
Male
Racial Groups
Social Perception
Thinking
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0facesrealbiracialhypodescentcomputer-generatedcategorizationshowedtaskessentialismmultiracialcategorizations2-ChoiceExperimentracialoutcomesMultiracialresearchemphasizesreliesstimuliFourexperimentsWhiteBlackelicitedAdditionally2increased3-Choice3mereexposureincreaseFinallyExperiments4a4breplicatedcomparingversionssumfindingsinitiatediscussionsurroundingmethodologyfacevalue:PsychologicaldiffervsComputer-generated

Similar Articles

Cited By