Level, motivation and barriers to participate in physical activity among late adolescents in Puducherry.

P Divyasree, G Dinesh Kumar, L Subitha, R S Ramesh
Author Information
  1. P Divyasree: Department of Community Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry - 605006, India, Phone: +91 7356689761.
  2. G Dinesh Kumar: Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry 605006, India.
  3. L Subitha: Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry 605006, India.
  4. R S Ramesh: Department of Community Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry 605006, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One in every ten deaths globally is accounted for by physical inactivity-related risks. Adolescents constitute 18% of the world's total population and are at risk of becoming physically inactive in the future. Thus, this study aims to find the level of physical activity (PA) among late adolescents and factors that motivate and prevent them from being active.
METHODOLOGY: Four hundred and fifty adolescents in the age group of 18-19 years were included in the study. Standardized self-administered questionnaires such as the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire were used to assess the level of PA and level of motivation, respectively. In addition, barriers to participating in PA were also elicited.
RESULTS: This study found that about one third of the subjects (32.4%) were physically inactive. The motivation levels were more pooled towards the self-determined motives and girls are more motivated towards PA than boys. However, PA among males is significantly higher than females. Healthy practices in families was also found to have significant association with increased PA. The major barriers found were the excessive use of electronic gadgets and lethargy.
CONCLUSION: One third of the adolescents in this study were physically inactive and several barriers that prevent them from taking up PA were elicited. Therefore, efforts should be taken to emphasize the importance of physical activity among individuals, family members and the peers at institutional level and community level so as to lay foundations for healthy lifestyles in the future. Basic prevention in the emergence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) like PA is vital to curb the growing burden of chronic diseases in our country.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. Physical activity. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/physical_activity/en/.
  2. World Health Organization. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity. 2016 [cited 2017 Feb 5]. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/physical_activity_text/en/.
  3. Mandil AM, Alfurayh NA, Aljebreen MF, Aldukhi SA. Physical activity and major non communicable diseases among physicians in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:1243–50.
  4. WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Meditarraneans. 2017 [cited 2017 Dec 17]. Available from: http://www.who.int/about/regions/emro/en/.
  5. World Health Organization. Fact sheet. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/.
  6. Kansal OP, Ohri P. Adolescents: a key pivotal in India’s health strategy. Ind J Youth Adol Health. 2014;1:2349–880.
  7. Teixeira JP, Carraca E, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78.
  8. Morris T, Clayton H, Power H, Han H. Activity type differences in participation motives. Austr J Psychol. 1995;47:101–2.
  9. Welk GJ. The youth Physical activity promotion model: a conceptual bridge between theory and practice. Quest. 2012;51:5–23.
  10. Kumar D, Parashar A, Thakur A. How active is our young generation: an assessment of physical activities among youth in a city of Northern India. Ind J Youth Adol Health. 2016;3:21–5.
  11. World Health Organization. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire [cited 2017 Feb 5]. Available from http://www.who.int/chp/steps/GPAQ_EN.pdf.
  12. Markland D, Tobin V. A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:191–6.
  13. Singh T, Sharma S, Nagesh S. Socio-economic status scales updated for 2017. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:3264–7.
  14. Mark AE, Boyce WF, Janssen L. Television viewing, computer use and total screen time in Canadian youth. Peadiatr Child Health. 2006;11:595–9.
  15. Oyeyemi AL, Ishaku CM, Oyekola J, Wakawa HD, Lawan A. Patterns and associated factors of physical activity among adolescents in Nigeria. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150142.
  16. Duan J, Hu H, Wang G, Arao T. Study on current levels of physical activity among middle school students in Beijing, China. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133544.
  17. Roy S, Dasgupta A. Physical activity pattern among the adolescents of a rural community in West Bengal. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34:366–7.
  18. Gulati A, Hochdorn A, Paramesh H, Paramesh EC, Cliffi D, Kumar M et al. Physical activity patterns among school children in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81:47–54.
  19. Ministry of health and welfare Government of India. Integrated Disease surveillance Project. Non-communicable diseases risk factor survey. 2009 [cited Jan 20]. Available from http://www.icmr.nic.in/final/IDSP-NCD%20Reports/Phase-1%20States%20of%20India.pdf.
  20. Sevil J, Práxedes A, Abarca-Sos A, Villar DF, García-González L. Levels of physical activity, motivation and barriers to participation in university students. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016;56:1239–48.
  21. Kilpatrick M, Hebert E, Barthalomew J. College student’s motivation for physical activity: Differentiating men’s and women’s motives for sport participation and exercises. J Am coll Health. 2005;54:87–94.
  22. Zaraqoza J, Genereto E, Julian JA, Abarca-sos A. Barriers to adolescent girl’s participation in physical activity defined by physical activity levels. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011;51:125–35.
  23. Thompson JL, Davis SM, Giltelsohn J, Going S, Becenti A, Metcalfe L, et al. Patterns of physical activity among American Indian children: An assessment of barriers and support. J Community Health. 2001;26:423–45.
  24. Butt J, Weinberg RS, Breckon JD, Claytor RP. Adolescent physical activity participation and motivational determinants across gender, age and race. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8:1074–83.
  25. Verloigne M, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Tanghe A, D’Hondt E, Theuwis L, Vansteenkiste M, et al. Self-determined motivation towards physical activity in adolescents treated for obesity: an observational study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:97.

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PAphysicalleveladolescentsbarriersstudyactivityamongmotivationphysicallyinactivefoundOneriskfuturelatefactorspreventQuestionnairealsoelicitedthirdtowardsdiseasesBACKGROUND:everytendeathsgloballyaccountedinactivity-relatedrisksAdolescentsconstitute18%world'stotalpopulationbecomingThusaimsfindmotivateactiveMETHODOLOGY:Fourhundredfiftyagegroup18-19yearsincludedStandardizedself-administeredquestionnairesGlobalPhysicalActivityBehavioralRegulationExerciseusedassessrespectivelyadditionparticipatingRESULTS:onesubjects324%levelspooledself-determinedmotivesgirlsmotivatedboysHowevermalessignificantlyhigherfemalesHealthypracticesfamiliessignificantassociationincreasedmajorexcessiveuseelectronicgadgetslethargyCONCLUSION:severaltakingThereforeeffortstakenemphasizeimportanceindividualsfamilymemberspeersinstitutionalcommunitylayfoundationshealthylifestylesBasicpreventionemergencenon-communicableNCDslikevitalcurbgrowingburdenchroniccountryLevelparticipatePuducherry

Similar Articles

Cited By