Are Emergency Medicine Residents Prepared to Meet the Ethical Challenges of Clinical Practice? Findings from an Exploratory National Survey.

Aasim I Padela, Joshua Davis, Stephen Hall, Alyrene Dorey, Shellie Asher
Author Information
  1. Aasim I Padela: Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Des Plaines IL.
  2. Joshua Davis: Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Des Plaines IL.
  3. Stephen Hall: Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Des Plaines IL.
  4. Alyrene Dorey: Department of Emergency Medicine University of California Davis CA.
  5. Shellie Asher: Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Des Plaines IL.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Emergency Medicine require clinical ethics education in residency training, instruction varies widely. We assessed the educational preparedness of trainees in emergency medicine to address ethics challenges common to their field.
METHODS: The survey assessed two outcomes: 1) knowledge of specific ethical challenges and 2) perceived educational preparedness, across five ethics areas: 1) informed consent and decisional-capacity assessment, 2) surrogate decision making, 3) interpretation of advanced directives, 4) withdrawing and/or withholding life support, and 5) presumed consent for emergency treatment. Clinical vignettes, revised through expert panel review and pilot testing, were utilized to evaluate these areas. The final instrument was administered via Web link to emergency medicine residents and recent graduates through adverts within Emergency Medicine Residency Association and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) newsletters and social media platforms. Additionally, targeted e-mails through the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine, the Clerkship Directors of Emergency Medicine, and the SAEM Ethics Committee listservs encouraged survey distribution. Analyses involved one-way analysis of variance for overall knowledge scores and chi-square tests for categorical outcomes. Multivariable regression models tested associations between respondent characteristics and outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 302 participants of which 34% reported having a dedicated ethics module within their residency curriculum. The mean (±SD) knowledge score was 59.7% (±12.8%); assessing decisional capacity was the most difficult topic for respondents as only 1% both correctly addressed the general issue and identified the correct plan of action. Participants having a dedicated ethics module perceived themselves better prepared, although there was no association between having a dedicated ethics module and knowledge scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in clinical ethics knowledge appear prevalent among emergency medicine trainees, and few programs have dedicated ethics modules. Greater study is needed to understand and remedy clinical ethics knowledge shortfalls.

References

  1. J Surg Educ. 2009 Jan-Feb;66(1):35-42 [PMID: 19215896]
  2. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):265-86 [PMID: 22038062]
  3. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Aug;25(8):689 [PMID: 18339211]
  4. Clin Dermatol. 2009 Jul-Aug;27(4):405-10 [PMID: 19539170]
  5. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Dec;5(12):1193-9 [PMID: 9864133]
  6. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34 [PMID: 15471760]
  7. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 24;312(4):253-6 [PMID: 3965960]
  8. Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;41(4):520-525 [PMID: 27644429]
  9. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Apr;162(4):368-73 [PMID: 18391146]
  10. Acad Radiol. 2009 Jan;16(1):108-16 [PMID: 19064218]
  11. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 [PMID: 18929686]
  12. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):184-8 [PMID: 8044100]
  13. Nurs Ethics. 2010 May;17(3):373-82 [PMID: 20444778]
  14. Acad Med. 2005 Dec;80(12):1143-52 [PMID: 16306292]
  15. Acad Psychiatry. 2005 Jul-Aug;29(3):301-9 [PMID: 16141129]
  16. AEM Educ Train. 2018 Oct 07;2(4):301-309 [PMID: 30386840]
  17. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):581-90 [PMID: 18970998]
  18. Virtual Mentor. 2007 Mar 01;9(3):174-81 [PMID: 23217927]
  19. Virtual Mentor. 2014 May 01;16(5):348-56 [PMID: 24847704]
  20. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014 Aug;73(8):262-4 [PMID: 25157328]
  21. Virtual Mentor. 2003 Feb 01;5(2): [PMID: 23267608]
  22. Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36 Suppl:S36-42 [PMID: 14961401]
  23. Acad Med. 2015 Jun;90(6):744-52 [PMID: 25881647]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ethicsEmergencyMedicineknowledgeemergencydedicatedclinicalmedicinemoduleCouncilresidencyassessededucationalpreparednesstraineeschallengessurvey12perceivedconsentClinicalwithinResidencySAEMDirectorsscoresoutcomesBACKGROUND:AlthoughAccreditationGraduateMedicalEducationAmericanBoardrequireeducationtraininginstructionvarieswidelyaddresscommonfieldMETHODS:twooutcomes:specificethicalacrossfiveareas:informeddecisional-capacityassessmentsurrogatedecisionmaking3interpretationadvanceddirectives4withdrawingand/orwithholdinglifesupport5presumedtreatmentvignettesrevisedexpertpanelreviewpilottestingutilizedevaluateareasfinalinstrumentadministeredviaWeblinkresidentsrecentgraduatesadvertsAssociationSocietyAcademicnewsletterssocialmediaplatformsAdditionallytargetede-mailsClerkshipEthicsCommitteelistservsencourageddistributionAnalysesinvolvedone-wayanalysisvarianceoverallchi-squaretestscategoricalMultivariableregressionmodelstestedassociationsrespondentcharacteristicsRESULTS:302participants34%reportedcurriculummean±SDscore597%±128%assessingdecisionalcapacitydifficulttopicrespondents1%correctlyaddressedgeneralissueidentifiedcorrectplanactionParticipantsbetterpreparedalthoughassociationCONCLUSIONS:GapsappearprevalentamongprogramsmodulesGreaterstudyneededunderstandremedyshortfallsResidentsPreparedMeetEthicalChallengesPractice?FindingsExploratoryNationalSurvey

Similar Articles

Cited By