State space and movement specification in open population spatial capture-recapture models.

Beth Gardner, Rahel Sollmann, N Samba Kumar, Devcharan Jathanna, K Ullas Karanth
Author Information
  1. Beth Gardner: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington Seattle Washington. ORCID
  2. Rahel Sollmann: Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology University of California, Davis Davis California. ORCID
  3. N Samba Kumar: Centre for Wildlife Studies Bangalore Karnataka India. ORCID
  4. Devcharan Jathanna: Centre for Wildlife Studies Bangalore Karnataka India. ORCID
  5. K Ullas Karanth: Centre for Wildlife Studies Bangalore Karnataka India. ORCID

Abstract

With continued global changes, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and habitat fragmentation, the need for assessment of long-term population dynamics and population monitoring of threatened species is growing. One powerful way to estimate population size and dynamics is through capture-recapture methods. Spatial capture (SCR) models for open populations make efficient use of capture-recapture data, while being robust to design changes. Relatively few studies have implemented open SCR models, and to date, very few have explored potential issues in defining these models. We develop a series of simulation studies to examine the effects of the state-space definition and between-primary-period movement models on demographic parameter estimation. We demonstrate the implications on a 10-year camera-trap study of tigers in India. The results of our simulation study show that movement biases survival estimates in open SCR models when little is known about between-primary-period movements of animals. The size of the state-space delineation can also bias the estimates of survival in certain cases.We found that both the state-space definition and the between-primary-period movement specification affected survival estimates in the analysis of the tiger dataset (posterior mean estimates of survival ranged from 0.71 to 0.89). In general, we suggest that open SCR models can provide an efficient and flexible framework for long-term monitoring of populations; however, in many cases, realistic modeling of between-primary-period movements is crucial for unbiased estimates of survival and density.

Keywords

References

  1. Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2676-82 [PMID: 19886477]
  2. Ecology. 2010 Nov;91(11):3376-83 [PMID: 21141198]
  3. Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep 27;8(20):10336-10344 [PMID: 30397470]
  4. Ecology. 2006 Nov;87(11):2925-37 [PMID: 17168036]
  5. PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0176966 [PMID: 28520796]
  6. Ecology. 2012 Jul;93(7):1509-16 [PMID: 22919897]
  7. Biometrika. 1965 Jun;52:225-47 [PMID: 14341276]
  8. Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):695-705 [PMID: 26214915]
  9. Ecology. 2013 Mar;94(3):553-9 [PMID: 23687880]
  10. Ecology. 2009 Nov;90(11):3233-44 [PMID: 19967878]
  11. Biometrics. 2008 Jun;64(2):377-85 [PMID: 17970815]
  12. Ecology. 2009 Apr;90(4):1106-15 [PMID: 19449704]
  13. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0134446 [PMID: 26230262]
  14. Biometrika. 1965 Jun;52:249-59 [PMID: 14341277]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0modelspopulationopenmovementsurvivalestimatesSCRbetween-primary-perioddynamicscapture-recapturestate-spacechangeslong-termmonitoringsizepopulationsefficientstudiessimulationdefinitionstudytigersmovementscancasesspecification0continuedglobalclimatechangebiodiversitylosshabitatfragmentationneedassessmentthreatenedspeciesgrowingOnepowerfulwayestimatemethodsSpatialcapturemakeusedatarobustdesignRelativelyimplementeddateexploredpotentialissuesdefiningdevelopseriesexamineeffectsdemographicparameterestimationdemonstrateimplications10-yearcamera-trapIndiaresultsshowbiaseslittleknownanimalsdelineationalsobiascertainWefoundaffectedanalysistigerdatasetposteriormeanranged7189generalsuggestprovideflexibleframeworkhowevermanyrealisticmodelingcrucialunbiaseddensityStatespacespatialMarkoviancamera‐trappingdispersaltransience

Similar Articles

Cited By