Prospective Evaluation of Internalized Weight Bias and Weight Change Among Successful Weight-Loss Maintainers.

KayLoni L Olson, Jason Lillis, J Graham Thomas, Rena R Wing
Author Information
  1. KayLoni L Olson: Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. ORCID
  2. Jason Lillis: Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  3. J Graham Thomas: Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. ORCID
  4. Rena R Wing: Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Internalized weight bias (IWB) has been associated with weight regain after intentional weight loss, but reliance on cross-sectional data limits the understanding of this relationship. This study prospectively evaluated IWB as a predictor of weight change in a longitudinal observational study of successful weight-loss maintainers.
METHODS: National Weight Control Registry participants (maintained 13.6-kg weight loss for ≥ 1 y) were asked to complete an online questionnaire including current weight and Weight Bias Internalization Scale-Modified (WBIS-M) at baseline and 12 months.
RESULTS: At baseline, 1,250 of 1,643 eligible individuals completed the baseline assessment (71% female; 94% white; mean age ± SD: 52 y ± 13.1; BMI: 27 ± 5.5). The average WBIS-M score was 3.0 (± 1.3). Study completers (n = 862) reported 2.2% (± 7.8%) weight gain. Higher baseline IWB predicted weight gain among men (n = 254; t = -2.28; P = 0.02) but not women (n = 608; t = 1.22; P = 0.22). A one-point reduction in WBIS-M score at follow-up was associated with a 3.0% weight loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Among weight-loss maintainers, IWB may be a risk factor for weight gain among men. Weight loss at follow-up was associated with reduced IWB in both men and women. Reliance on female-only samples may limit our understanding of IWB and its implications for weight control.

References

  1. Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Aug;51(8):973-977 [PMID: 29722045]
  2. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Mar;23(3):221-30 [PMID: 10193866]
  3. JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2284-91 [PMID: 27272580]
  4. Eat Behav. 2016 Apr;21:104-8 [PMID: 26826975]
  5. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 May;18(5):971-6 [PMID: 19834462]
  6. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Feb;25(2):317-322 [PMID: 28124502]
  7. J Adv Nurs. 2018 May;74(5):1030-1042 [PMID: 29171076]
  8. Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Jun;4(2):182-90 [PMID: 26627213]
  9. J Health Psychol. 2020 Jun;25(7):922-930 [PMID: 29105491]
  10. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Apr;19(4):757-62 [PMID: 20948515]
  11. J Health Psychol. 2011 Jul;16(5):722-7 [PMID: 21441358]
  12. Stigma Health. 2019 Aug;4(3):243-246 [PMID: 31592443]
  13. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jan;15(1):19-23 [PMID: 17228027]
  14. J Eat Disord. 2013 Jan 22;1:3 [PMID: 24764526]
  15. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Oct;14(10):1802-15 [PMID: 17062811]
  16. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Feb;37(1):58-69 [PMID: 19252962]
  17. Eat Weight Disord. 2018 Jun;23(3):357-362 [PMID: 27787772]
  18. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S69-74 [PMID: 18978766]
  19. J Health Psychol. 2014 Feb;19(2):296-311 [PMID: 23349402]
  20. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jun;26(6):949 [PMID: 29722473]
  21. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jun;26(6):968-976 [PMID: 29687615]
  22. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Aug;66(2):239-46 [PMID: 9250100]
  23. Ann Behav Med. 2017 Oct;51(5):754-763 [PMID: 28251579]
  24. Obes Surg. 2014 Dec;24(12):2195-9 [PMID: 25337868]
  25. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S80-6 [PMID: 18978768]
  26. Eat Behav. 2010 Aug;11(3):180-5 [PMID: 20434066]
  27. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jan;26(1):167-175 [PMID: 29082666]
  28. Appetite. 2016 Jul 1;102:32-43 [PMID: 26829370]
  29. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan;22(1):79-85 [PMID: 23836723]
  30. Body Image. 2014 Jan;11(1):89-92 [PMID: 24100004]

Grants

  1. K23 DK097143/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. T32 HL076134/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Bias
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Weight Loss

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0weightIWBWeightlossbaselineassociatedWBIS-M13gainmenInternalizedunderstandingstudyweight-lossmaintainersBiasscoreamongP = 0women22follow-upAmongmayOBJECTIVE:biasregainintentionalreliancecross-sectionaldatalimitsrelationshipprospectivelyevaluatedpredictorchangelongitudinalobservationalsuccessfulMETHODS:NationalControlRegistryparticipantsmaintained136-kgfor ≥ 1yaskedcompleteonlinequestionnaireincludingcurrentInternalizationScale-Modified12monthsRESULTS:250643eligibleindividualscompletedassessment71%female94%whitemeanage ± SD:52y ± 13BMI:27 ± 55average0± 1Studycompletersn = 862reported22%± 78%Higherpredictedn = 254t = -22802n = 608t = 1one-pointreduction0%CONCLUSIONS:riskfactorreducedReliancefemale-onlysampleslimitimplicationscontrolProspectiveEvaluationChangeSuccessfulWeight-LossMaintainers

Similar Articles

Cited By