Integrated Population Modeling Provides the First Empirical Estimates of Vital Rates and Abundance for Polar Bears in the Chukchi Sea.

Eric V Regehr, Nathan J Hostetter, Ryan R Wilson, Karyn D Rode, Michelle St Martin, Sarah J Converse
Author Information
  1. Eric V Regehr: Marine Mammals Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, USA. eregehr@uw.edu. ORCID
  2. Nathan J Hostetter: U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA. ORCID
  3. Ryan R Wilson: Marine Mammals Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, USA. ORCID
  4. Karyn D Rode: U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, USA.
  5. Michelle St Martin: Marine Mammals Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, USA.
  6. Sarah J Converse: U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences (SEFS) & School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences (SAFS), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Large carnivores are imperiled globally, and characteristics making them vulnerable to extinction (e.g., low densities and expansive ranges) also make it difficult to estimate demographic parameters needed for management. Here we develop an integrated population model to analyze capture-recapture, radiotelemetry, and count data for the Chukchi Sea subpopulation of polar bears (Ursus maritimus), 2008-2016. Our model addressed several challenges in capture-recapture studies for polar bears by including a multievent structure reflecting location and life history states, while accommodating state uncertainty. Female breeding probability was 0.83 (95% credible interval [CRI] = 0.71-0.90), with litter sizes of 2.18 (95% CRI = 1.71-2.82) for age-zero and 1.61 (95% CRI = 1.46-1.80) for age-one cubs. Total adult survival was 0.90 (95% CRI = 0.86-0.92) for females and 0.89 (95% CRI = 0.83-0.93) for males. Spring on-ice densities west of Alaska were 0.0030 bears/km (95% CRI = 0.0016-0.0060), similar to 1980s-era density estimates although methodological differences complicate comparison. Abundance of the Chukchi Sea subpopulation, derived by extrapolating density from the study area using a spatially-explicit habitat metric, was 2,937 bears (95% CRI = 1,552-5,944). Our findings are consistent with other lines of evidence suggesting the Chukchi Sea subpopulation has been productive in recent years, although it is uncertain how long this will continue given sea-ice loss due to climate change.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0142213 [PMID: 26580809]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836): [PMID: 27534959]
  3. Biol Lett. 2016 Dec;12(12): [PMID: 27928000]
  4. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Jul;14(7):268-272 [PMID: 10370262]
  5. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 14;8(1):16780 [PMID: 30429493]
  6. Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):410-423 [PMID: 28994242]
  7. Ecol Appl. 2016 Jul;26(5):1302-1320 [PMID: 27755745]
  8. J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jan;79(1):117-27 [PMID: 19754681]
  9. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jan;20(1):76-88 [PMID: 23913506]
  10. J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):11-20 [PMID: 25786026]
  11. J Appl Ecol. 2017 Oct;54(5):1534-1543 [PMID: 29081540]
  12. Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 23;6(9):2897-924 [PMID: 27069588]
  13. Oecologia. 2018 Feb;186(2):369-381 [PMID: 29197040]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 05;280(1752):20122371 [PMID: 23222446]
  15. Conserv Biol. 2014 Aug;28(4):1109-18 [PMID: 25187922]
  16. Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):1241484 [PMID: 24408439]
  17. Ecol Appl. 2009 Jan;19(1):55-68 [PMID: 19323173]
  18. Ecol Appl. 2014 Jul;24(5):1155-66 [PMID: 25154103]
  19. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2642-51 [PMID: 21844043]
  20. Ecology. 2010 Oct;91(10):2883-97 [PMID: 21058549]
  21. Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):442-7 [PMID: 16011690]
  22. Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95 [PMID: 11919621]
  23. Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):7-14 [PMID: 20380189]
  24. Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):724-37 [PMID: 25783745]
  25. Biometrics. 2002 Sep;58(3):540-7 [PMID: 12229988]
  26. Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):634-51 [PMID: 26214910]
  27. J Wildl Dis. 1989 Apr;25(2):159-68 [PMID: 2716095]

MeSH Term

Alaska
Animals
Arctic Regions
Breeding
Climate Change
Ecosystem
Female
Ice Cover
Male
Population Dynamics
Reproduction
Survival Rate
Uncertainty
Ursidae

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.095%0CRIChukchiSeasubpopulationbears=densitiesmodelcapture-recapturepolar= 0902= 11densityalthoughAbundanceLargecarnivoresimperiledgloballycharacteristicsmakingvulnerableextinctioneglowexpansiverangesalsomakedifficultestimatedemographicparametersneededmanagementdevelopintegratedpopulationanalyzeradiotelemetrycountdataUrsusmaritimus2008-2016addressedseveralchallengesstudiesincludingmultieventstructurereflectinglocationlifehistorystatesaccommodatingstateuncertaintyFemalebreedingprobability83credibleinterval[CRI]71-0littersizes1871-282age-zero6146-180age-onecubsTotaladultsurvival86-092females8983-093malesSpringon-icewestAlaska0030bears/km0016-00060similar1980s-eraestimatesmethodologicaldifferencescomplicatecomparisonderivedextrapolatingstudyareausingspatially-explicithabitatmetric937552-5944findingsconsistentlinesevidencesuggestingproductiverecentyearsuncertainlongwillcontinuegivensea-icelossdueclimatechangeIntegratedPopulationModelingProvidesFirstEmpiricalEstimatesVitalRatesPolarBears

Similar Articles

Cited By