Global Health Mentoring Toolkits: A Scoping Review Relevant for Low- and Middle-Income Country Institutions.
Bhakti Hansoti, Anna Kalbarczyk, Mina C Hosseinipour, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Joseph D Tucker, Jean Nachega, Lee Wallis, Jonathan K Stiles, Adriane Wynn, Chelsea Morroni
Author Information
Bhakti Hansoti: Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anna Kalbarczyk: Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mina C Hosseinipour: Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Dorairaj Prabhakaran: Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph D Tucker: UNC Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Jean Nachega: Departments of Epidemiology and International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lee Wallis: Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Jonathan K Stiles: Department of Microbiology Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Adriane Wynn: University of California Global Health Institute, San Francisco, California.
Chelsea Morroni: Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Capacity building in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions hinges on the delivery of effective mentorship. This study presents an overview of mentorship toolkits applicable to LMIC institutions identified through a scoping review. A scoping review approach was used to 1) map the extent, range, and nature of mentorship resources and tools available and 2) to identify knowledge gaps in the current literature. To identify toolkits, we collected and analyzed data provided online that met the following criteria: written in English and from organizations and individuals involved in global health mentoring. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and Google search engine. Once toolkits were identified, we extracted the available tools and mapped them to pre-identified global health competencies. Only three of the 18 identified toolkits were developed specifically for the LMIC context. Most toolkits focused on individual mentor-mentee relationships. Most focused on the domains of communication and professional development. Fewer toolkits focused on ethics, overcoming resource limitations, and fostering institutional change. No toolkits discussed strategies for group mentoring or how to adapt existing tools to a local context. There is a paucity of mentoring resources specifically designed for LMIC settings. We identified several toolkits that focus on aspects of individual mentor-mentee relationships that could be adapted to local contexts. Future work should focus on adaptation and the development of tools to support institutional change and capacity building for mentoring.
