Levels of organochlorine pesticide residues in fresh water fishes of three bird sanctuaries in Tamil Nadu, India.

Jayakumar Samidurai, Muralidharan Subramanian, Dhananjayan Venugopal
Author Information
  1. Jayakumar Samidurai: Division of Ecotoxicology, Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641108, India. jayakumar.sacon@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Muralidharan Subramanian: Division of Ecotoxicology, Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641108, India.
  3. Dhananjayan Venugopal: Division of Ecotoxicology, Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641108, India.

Abstract

Organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues were determined in nine species of fresh water fishes caught from three bird sanctuaries in Tamil Nadu, India. A total of 302 fishes were analyzed for various types of OCPS. OCPs, namely hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane (DDT), heptachlor epoxide, endosulfan, and dieldrin were detected among various species of fishes. Among the various OCPs analyzed, HCH was the most frequently detected pesticides. Among the HCH isomers, β HCH contributed more than 50% to the Σ HCH. p,p' DDT, the metabolites of DDT, had high percentage of occurrence. Among the cyclodiene insecticide residues, endosulfan was detected in more than 60% of the fishes. Varying levels of ΣOCPs (a sum of Σ HCH, Σ DDT, Σ endosulfan, heptachlor epoxide, and dieldrin) were detected in various fish species, although it was not significant (p > 0.05). However, significant variations in OCPs were observed among location and between seasons (p < 0.05). However, continuous monitoring is recommended to facilitate the early identification of risks not only to the fishes, but also to fish-eating birds breeding in these sanctuaries.

Keywords

References

  1. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001 May;66(5):678-82 [PMID: 11443341]
  2. Environ Toxicol. 2001;16(6):550-6 [PMID: 11769254]
  3. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003 Aug;71(2):290-7 [PMID: 14560380]
  4. Environ Pollut. 1991;74(4):293-307 [PMID: 15092057]
  5. Environ Int. 2006 Feb;32(2):240-3 [PMID: 16213018]
  6. Chemosphere. 2006 Oct;65(4):583-90 [PMID: 16678236]
  7. Biodegradation. 2008 Feb;19(1):27-40 [PMID: 17387620]
  8. Indian J Med Res. 2007 Jul;126(1):1-3 [PMID: 17890815]
  9. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Dec;79(6):639-45 [PMID: 17924039]
  10. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008 Feb;80(2):154-7 [PMID: 18185901]
  11. Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Jan;148(1-4):421-35 [PMID: 18288582]
  12. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2008 Mar;34(1):25-36 [PMID: 18649020]
  13. Environ Res. 2009 Jan;109(1):15-21 [PMID: 18849026]
  14. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010 Dec;85(6):619-23 [PMID: 20936512]
  15. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2011 May;18(4):586-97 [PMID: 20967504]
  16. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2009 Mar;2(1):1-12 [PMID: 21217838]
  17. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011 Dec;87(6):684-8 [PMID: 21979140]
  18. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Mar;77:35-44 [PMID: 22071217]
  19. Mar Environ Res. 2012 May;76:63-70 [PMID: 22115920]
  20. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012 Apr;88(4):497-500 [PMID: 22323047]
  21. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 May;20(5):3149-56 [PMID: 23054790]
  22. Sci Total Environ. 2013 Apr 15;450-451:83-91 [PMID: 23467179]
  23. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Sep;95:113-22 [PMID: 23810211]
  24. Environ Int. 2013 Sep;59:290-302 [PMID: 23872388]
  25. Chemosphere. 2014 Jan;94:190-8 [PMID: 24184045]
  26. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:190353 [PMID: 24288666]
  27. Environ Int. 2014 May;66:48-64 [PMID: 24525153]
  28. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014 Aug;106:95-101 [PMID: 24836883]
  29. Environ Pollut. 2015 Jul;202:160-7 [PMID: 25827691]
  30. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;541:1232-1242 [PMID: 26476063]
  31. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Mar;125:128-34 [PMID: 26685785]
  32. Chemosphere. 2016 Feb;145:438-44 [PMID: 26694793]
  33. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:900-909 [PMID: 26851762]
  34. Sci Total Environ. 2017 May 15;586:792-806 [PMID: 28214119]
  35. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Oct;101(5):378-84 [PMID: 8080506]
  36. J AOAC Int. 1993 Jul-Aug;76(4):703-6 [PMID: 8374319]
  37. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Oct;57(4):568-74 [PMID: 8694874]
  38. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998 Nov;35(4):688-97 [PMID: 9776788]

MeSH Term

Animals
Birds
Environmental Monitoring
Fishes
Fresh Water
Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated
India
Pesticide Residues
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Chemicals

Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated
Pesticide Residues
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fishesHCHsanctuariesvariousDDTdetectedΣresiduesspeciesIndiaOCPsendosulfanAmongOrganochlorinepesticidefreshwaterthreebirdTamilNaduanalyzedheptachlorepoxidedieldrinamongpesticidessignificant05Howeverfish-eatingbirdsOCPdeterminedninecaughttotal302typesOCPSnamelyhexachlorocyclohexanedichlorodiphenyltrichloroethanefrequentlyisomersβcontributed50%pp'metaboliteshighpercentageoccurrencecyclodieneinsecticide60%VaryinglevelsΣOCPssumfishalthoughp > 0variationsobservedlocationseasonsp < 0continuousmonitoringrecommendedfacilitateearlyidentificationrisksalsobreedingLevelsorganochlorineBirdColonialFishesKoonthankulamVedanthangalVettangudi

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)