Possible Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Central Nerve System.

Ju Hwan Kim, Jin-Koo Lee, Hyung-Gun Kim, Kyu-Bong Kim, Hak Rim Kim
Author Information
  1. Ju Hwan Kim: Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.
  2. Jin-Koo Lee: Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.
  3. Hyung-Gun Kim: Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.
  4. Kyu-Bong Kim: Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.
  5. Hak Rim Kim: Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Technological advances of mankind, through the development of electrical and communication technologies, have resulted in the exposure to artificial electromagnetic fields (EMF). Technological growth is expected to continue; as such, the amount of EMF exposure will continue to increase steadily. In particular, the use-time of smart phones, that have become a necessity for modern people, is steadily increasing. Social concerns and interest in the impact on the cranial nervous system are increased when considering the area where the mobile phone is used. However, before discussing possible effects of radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) on the human body, several factors must be investigated about the influence of EMFs at the level of research using or animal models. Scientific studies on the mechanism of biological effects are also required. It has been found that RF-EMF can induce changes in central nervous system nerve cells, including neuronal cell apoptosis, changes in the function of the nerve myelin and ion channels; furthermore, RF-EMF act as a stress source in living creatures. The possible biological effects of RF-EMF exposure have not yet been proven, and there are insufficient data on biological hazards to provide a clear answer to possible health risks. Therefore, it is necessary to study the biological response to RF-EMF in consideration of the comprehensive exposure with regard to the use of various devices by individuals. In this review, we summarize the possible biological effects of RF-EMF exposure.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Radiat Biol. 1999 Apr;75(4):447-56 [PMID: 10331850]
  2. Bioelectromagnetics. 2000 Jan;21(1):52-6 [PMID: 10615092]
  3. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;23(6):1113-33 [PMID: 10621953]
  4. Phys Med Biol. 2000 Aug;45(8):2363-72 [PMID: 10958200]
  5. Brain Res. 2001 Jun 15;904(1):43-53 [PMID: 11516410]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11085-90 [PMID: 11562483]
  7. Behav Brain Res. 2002 Feb 1;129(1-2):203-10 [PMID: 11809512]
  8. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2002 Jul;50(6):369-73 [PMID: 12168254]
  9. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 Jan;24(1):49-62 [PMID: 12483665]
  10. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 Feb;24(2):82-90 [PMID: 12524674]
  11. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 May;24(4):223-30 [PMID: 12696082]
  12. Brain Res. 2003 Jun 13;975(1-2):179-88 [PMID: 12763606]
  13. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):881-3; discussion A408 [PMID: 12782486]
  14. Prog Neurobiol. 2003 Jun;70(2):83-244 [PMID: 12927745]
  15. Bioelectromagnetics. 1992;13(1):57-66 [PMID: 1312845]
  16. Behav Brain Res. 2003 Oct 17;145(1-2):51-61 [PMID: 14529805]
  17. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;Suppl 6:S107-47 [PMID: 14628310]
  18. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;Suppl 6:S148-61 [PMID: 14628311]
  19. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004 Jan;25(1):49-57 [PMID: 14696053]
  20. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 May;112(6):687-94 [PMID: 15121512]
  21. Behav Brain Res. 2004 Nov 5;155(1):37-43 [PMID: 15325777]
  22. ScientificWorldJournal. 2004 Oct 20;4 Suppl 2:48-54 [PMID: 15517102]
  23. Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jun;62(6):390-4 [PMID: 15901886]
  24. Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jun 20;161(2):229-37 [PMID: 15922049]
  25. Int J Radiat Biol. 2005 Mar;81(3):189-203 [PMID: 16019928]
  26. FEBS Lett. 2005 Aug 29;579(21):4829-36 [PMID: 16107253]
  27. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005 Oct;26(7):578-88 [PMID: 16142770]
  28. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005 Oct;26(7):529-35 [PMID: 16142784]
  29. Neurosci Lett. 2006 May 8;398(3):253-7 [PMID: 16443327]
  30. Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):307-13 [PMID: 16621850]
  31. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38(12):1995-9 [PMID: 16807057]
  32. Neurotoxicology. 2007 Mar;28(2):434-40 [PMID: 16962663]
  33. Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jan 22;412(1):34-8 [PMID: 17187929]
  34. Occup Environ Med. 2007 Sep;64(9):626-32 [PMID: 17409179]
  35. Radiat Res. 2007 Oct;168(4):471-9 [PMID: 17903040]
  36. Environ Toxicol. 2008 Jun;23(3):319-27 [PMID: 18214898]
  37. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Sep;29(6):488-97 [PMID: 18421712]
  38. Electromagn Biol Med. 2008;27(2):185-96 [PMID: 18568936]
  39. Neuron. 2008 Sep 25;59(6):861-72 [PMID: 18817727]
  40. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):79-88 [PMID: 19264461]
  41. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):89-102 [PMID: 19285841]
  42. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):103-12 [PMID: 19345073]
  43. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 8;361(15):1475-85 [PMID: 19812404]
  44. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5565-72 [PMID: 19826127]
  45. Brain Res. 2010 Jan 22;1311:189-96 [PMID: 19879861]
  46. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;19(1):191-210 [PMID: 20061638]
  47. Int J Androl. 2011 Feb;34(1):20-6 [PMID: 20236367]
  48. Brain Res Rev. 2010 Oct 5;65(1):80-97 [PMID: 20550949]
  49. BMJ. 2010 Jun 22;340:c3077 [PMID: 20570865]
  50. JAMA. 2011 Feb 23;305(8):808-13 [PMID: 21343580]
  51. Environ Health Prev Med. 2002 May;7(2):33-9 [PMID: 21432262]
  52. J Sleep Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):50-8 [PMID: 21489004]
  53. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011 May;161(9-10):251-62 [PMID: 21638216]
  54. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):624-6 [PMID: 21845765]
  55. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012 Apr;33(3):187-206 [PMID: 22021071]
  56. Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Nov;119(11):1534-8 [PMID: 22171384]
  57. Sci Rep. 2012;2:312 [PMID: 22428084]
  58. J Mol Neurosci. 2012 Sep;48(1):144-53 [PMID: 22588976]
  59. Perspect Public Health. 2012 Nov;132(6):299-304 [PMID: 23111085]
  60. Biomed Environ Sci. 2012 Oct;25(5):597-601 [PMID: 23122319]
  61. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Mar 1;240:197-201 [PMID: 23195115]
  62. Environ Int. 2013 Jan;51:116-40 [PMID: 23261519]
  63. Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):792-802 [PMID: 23657200]
  64. J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Aug;17(8):958-65 [PMID: 23802593]
  65. Radiat Res. 1990 Aug;123(2):199-202 [PMID: 2389006]
  66. Nat Med. 2013 Aug;19(8):983-97 [PMID: 23921753]
  67. Cell Calcium. 2014 Jan;55(1):48-58 [PMID: 24360572]
  68. Cell Res. 2014 Jan;24(1):24-41 [PMID: 24366339]
  69. J Cell Physiol. 2014 Nov;229(11):1776-86 [PMID: 24676932]
  70. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014 Apr 26;12:75 [PMID: 24843789]
  71. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2014;17(5):247-58 [PMID: 25205214]
  72. Int J Oncol. 2015 May;46(5):1865-71 [PMID: 25738972]
  73. J Radiat Res. 2015 May;56(3):467-74 [PMID: 25835473]
  74. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 14;10(4):e0124136 [PMID: 25875081]
  75. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(2):99-116 [PMID: 25879308]
  76. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2015;12(5):481-92 [PMID: 26017559]
  77. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2015 Sep 01;5(3):105-14 [PMID: 26396966]
  78. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):251-71 [PMID: 26613326]
  79. Environ Res. 2016 Feb;145:50-60 [PMID: 26618505]
  80. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):99-104 [PMID: 26708410]
  81. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016 Jan;37(1):25-36 [PMID: 26769168]
  82. Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 18;6:21774 [PMID: 26887777]
  83. Ren Fail. 2016;38(4):571-80 [PMID: 26905323]
  84. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 07;11(3):e0150923 [PMID: 26950212]
  85. Brain Res. 2016 Jul 1;1642:10-19 [PMID: 26972535]
  86. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0153308 [PMID: 27073885]
  87. Biogerontology. 2016 Nov;17(5-6):841-857 [PMID: 27241674]
  88. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(4):393-7 [PMID: 27355805]
  89. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016 Sep;37(6):391-9 [PMID: 27434853]
  90. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Dec;23(24):25343-25355 [PMID: 27696165]
  91. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 20;7:41129 [PMID: 28106136]
  92. Environ Int. 2017 Jul;104:122-131 [PMID: 28392066]
  93. Free Radic Res. 2017 May;51(5):460-469 [PMID: 28463090]
  94. Cell Death Dis. 2017 May 11;8(5):e2780 [PMID: 28492547]
  95. Environ Int. 2017 Oct;107:65-74 [PMID: 28668725]
  96. Cell Calcium. 2018 Mar;70:87-94 [PMID: 28728834]
  97. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017 Sep;93(9):990-999 [PMID: 28747141]
  98. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186416 [PMID: 29045446]
  99. Toxicol Ind Health. 2018 Jan;34(1):23-35 [PMID: 29166827]
  100. Neurosci Lett. 2018 Feb 14;666:64-69 [PMID: 29273398]
  101. Bioelectromagnetics. 2018 Apr;39(3):190-199 [PMID: 29537695]
  102. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018 May;22(3):277-289 [PMID: 29719450]
  103. Neuron. 2018 May 2;98(3):466-481 [PMID: 29723500]
  104. Scand J Psychol. 2018 Aug;59(4):422-427 [PMID: 29741795]
  105. Environ Int. 2018 Aug;117:204-214 [PMID: 29754001]
  106. Int J Radiat Biol. 2018 Oct;94(10):877-882 [PMID: 29775391]
  107. Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:700-707 [PMID: 29884548]
  108. Nature. 1982 Jun 24;297(5868):681-3 [PMID: 7088155]
  109. Microsc Res Tech. 1994 Apr 15;27(6):535-42 [PMID: 8012056]
  110. Bioelectromagnetics. 1994;15(2):95-104 [PMID: 8024608]
  111. Brain Res. 1977 May 6;126(2):281-93 [PMID: 861720]
  112. Sci Total Environ. 1996 Feb 2;180(1):87-93 [PMID: 8717320]
  113. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18(6):455-61 [PMID: 9261543]
  114. Epidemiology. 1997 Sep;8(5):575-83 [PMID: 9270962]
  115. Acta Neuropathol. 1997 Nov;94(5):465-70 [PMID: 9386779]
  116. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Mar;106(3):101-3 [PMID: 9441959]
  117. Neuroendocrinology. 1998 Feb;67(2):139-44 [PMID: 9508044]
  118. Health Phys. 1998 Apr;74(4):494-522 [PMID: 9525427]
  119. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(3):199-202 [PMID: 9554698]
  120. Lancet. 1998 Jun 20;351(9119):1857-8 [PMID: 9652672]
  121. Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):2038-42 [PMID: 9748165]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RF-EMFexposurebiologicalpossibleeffectsnervoussystemTechnologicalEMFcontinuesteadilyfieldchangesnerveRadiofrequencyElectromagneticCentraladvancesmankinddevelopmentelectricalcommunicationtechnologiesresultedartificialelectromagneticfieldsgrowthexpectedamountwillincreaseparticularuse-timesmartphonesbecomenecessitymodernpeopleincreasingSocialconcernsinterestimpactcranialincreasedconsideringareamobilephoneusedHoweverdiscussingradiofrequency-electromagnetichumanbodyseveralfactorsmustinvestigatedinfluenceEMFslevelresearchusinganimalmodelsScientificstudiesmechanismalsorequiredfoundcaninducecentralcellsincludingneuronalcellapoptosisfunctionmyelinionchannelsfurthermoreactstresssourcelivingcreaturesyetproveninsufficientdatahazardsprovideclearanswerhealthrisksThereforenecessarystudyresponseconsiderationcomprehensiveregardusevariousdevicesindividualsreviewsummarizePossibleEffectsFieldExposureNerveSystemBrainNeuronStress

Similar Articles

Cited By