Can professional football clubs deliver a weight management programme for women: a feasibility study.

Christopher Bunn, Craig Donnachie, Sally Wyke, Kate Hunt, Graham Brennan, Jemma Lennox, Alice Maclean, Cindy M Gray
Author Information
  1. Christopher Bunn: Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. christopher.bunn@glasgow.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Craig Donnachie: Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  3. Sally Wyke: Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  4. Kate Hunt: Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  5. Graham Brennan: Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  6. Jemma Lennox: Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  7. Alice Maclean: Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  8. Cindy M Gray: Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Levels of obesity remain high in the UK. The Football Fans in Training (FFIT) randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that a 12-week, gender-sensitised weight management, physical activity and healthy eating group programme delivered through professional football clubs helped men aged 35-65 years with BMI at least 28 kg/m lose a clinically-significant amount of weight. We aimed to test the feasibility of a minimally-adapted FFIT programme for delivery to women by assessing recruitment and completion rates; determining if the programme content and delivery required further refinement; and evaluating the potential of FFIT for Women to deliver improvements in weight and other clinical, behavioural and psychological outcomes.
METHODS: A feasibility study of the FFIT for Women programme including before-and-after measurements of clinical (weight, waist, body mass index [BMI], blood pressure) behavioural (self-reported physical activity, food and alcohol intake) and psychological (self-esteem, positive and negative affect, physical and mental HRQoL) outcomes at five professional football clubs. Post-programme focus groups assessed acceptability of the programme format, content and style of delivery for women.
RESULTS: Recruitment across the five clubs resulted in 123 women aged 35-65 years with BMI at least 28 kg/m taking part in the study. The mean weight (95.3 kg) and BMI (36.6 kg/m2) of the cohort were both suggestive of high risk of future disease. Of 123 women who started the programme, 94 (76%) completed it; 72 (58.5%) returned for 12-week follow-up measurements. Participants compared FFIT for Women favourably to commercial weight loss programmes and emphasised the importance of the programme's physical activity content. They also spoke positively about group dynamics, suggested that the approach to food was less restrictive than in other weight loss approaches, and broadly enjoyed the football setting. Mean weight loss was 2.87 kg (95% CI 2.09, 3.65, p ≤ 0.001). Mean waist reduction was 3.84 cm (2.92, 4.77, p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In this evaluation, FFIT for Women was feasible, acceptable and demonstrated potential as a weight loss programme. Our findings suggest the programme has the potential to produce outcomes that are on a par with existing commercial and state-funded offerings.

Keywords

References

  1. Public Health. 2009 Jan;123(1):12-4 [PMID: 19049841]
  2. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 28;15(1):60 [PMID: 29954449]
  3. BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 16;13:232 [PMID: 23496915]
  4. Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701 [PMID: 19916637]
  5. Obes Facts. 2011;4(2):113-20 [PMID: 21577018]
  6. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Oct 30;10:121 [PMID: 24171842]
  7. BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 14;15:1129 [PMID: 26577260]
  8. BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 05;15:220 [PMID: 25884183]
  9. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Apr;19(4):757-62 [PMID: 20948515]
  10. Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1211-21 [PMID: 24457205]
  11. Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766-81 [PMID: 24880830]
  12. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):375-81 [PMID: 7895964]
  13. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):741 [PMID: 21872731]
  14. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):815-25 [PMID: 21872750]
  15. Obes Rev. 2009 Mar;10(2):154-67 [PMID: 19021872]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 06;11:434 [PMID: 21645343]
  17. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 7;7(3):e014592 [PMID: 28270391]
  18. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e60-7 [PMID: 24328657]
  19. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95 [PMID: 12900694]
  20. BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 27;11:136 [PMID: 21352562]
  21. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 21;8:115 [PMID: 22018588]
  22. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015 Sep 22;10:28577 [PMID: 26400462]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 18;11:119 [PMID: 21333011]
  24. Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Jun;38(5):812-28 [PMID: 26864994]

Grants

  1. MC_UU_12017/3/Medical Research Council
  2. MC_UU12017/12/Medical Research Council (GB)
  3. MC_UU12017/12/Medical Research Council
  4. 09/3010/06/Department of Health
  5. SPHSU12/Chief Scientist Office (GB)
  6. MC_UU_12017/12/Medical Research Council
  7. SPHSU12/Chief Scientist Office

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Cohort Studies
Feasibility Studies
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Middle Aged
Obesity
Program Evaluation
Soccer
United Kingdom
Weight Reduction Programs

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0weightprogrammeFFITWomenphysicalactivityfootballclubswomenlossmanagementprofessionalBMIfeasibilitydeliverycontentpotentialoutcomesstudy2highFootballdemonstrated12-weekgroupaged35-65 yearsleast28 kg/mdeliverclinicalbehaviouralpsychologicalmeasurementswaistfoodfive123commercialMean3p ≤ 0001BACKGROUND:LevelsobesityremainUKFansTrainingrandomisedcontrolledtrialRCTgender-sensitisedhealthyeatingdeliveredhelpedmenloseclinically-significantamountaimedtestminimally-adaptedassessingrecruitmentcompletionratesdeterminingrequiredrefinementevaluatingimprovementsMETHODS:includingbefore-and-afterbodymassindex[BMI]bloodpressureself-reportedalcoholintakeself-esteempositivenegativeaffectmentalHRQoLPost-programmefocusgroupsassessedacceptabilityformatstyleRESULTS:Recruitmentacrossresultedtakingpartmean953 kg366 kg/m2cohortsuggestiveriskfuturediseasestarted9476%completed72585%returnedfollow-upParticipantscomparedfavourablyprogrammesemphasisedimportanceprogramme'salsospokepositivelydynamicssuggestedapproachlessrestrictiveapproachesbroadlyenjoyedsetting87 kg95%CI0965reduction84 cm92477CONCLUSION:evaluationfeasibleacceptablefindingssuggestproduceparexistingstate-fundedofferingsCanwomen:GenderObesityPhysicalWeight

Similar Articles

Cited By