Isolation and molecular characterization of dengue virus clinical isolates from pediatric patients in New Delhi.

Meenakshi Kar, Amul Nisheetha, Anuj Kumar, Suraj Jagtap, Jitendra Shinde, Mohit Singla, Saranya M, Awadhesh Pandit, Anmol Chandele, Sushil K Kabra, Sudhir Krishna, Rahul Roy, Rakesh Lodha, Chitra Pattabiraman, Guruprasad R Medigeshi
Author Information
  1. Meenakshi Kar: Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
  2. Amul Nisheetha: National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bengaluru, India.
  3. Anuj Kumar: National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bengaluru, India.
  4. Suraj Jagtap: Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
  5. Jitendra Shinde: Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
  6. Mohit Singla: Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  7. Saranya M: Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
  8. Awadhesh Pandit: National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bengaluru, India.
  9. Anmol Chandele: ICGEB-Emory Vaccine Center, ICGEB Campus, New Delhi, India.
  10. Sushil K Kabra: Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  11. Sudhir Krishna: National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bengaluru, India.
  12. Rahul Roy: Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India; Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India; Center for Biosystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
  13. Rakesh Lodha: Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  14. Chitra Pattabiraman: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
  15. Guruprasad R Medigeshi: Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India. Electronic address: gmedigeshi@thsti.res.in.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the in vitro replication fitness, viral diversity, and phylogeny of dengue viruses (DENV) isolated from Indian patients.
METHODS: DENV was isolated from whole blood collected from patients by passaging in cell culture. Passage 3 viruses were used for growth kinetics in C6/36 mosquito cells. Parallel efforts also focused on the isolation of DENV RNA from plasma samples of the same patients, which were processed for next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS: It was possible to isolate 64 clinical isolates of DENV, mostly DENV-2. Twenty-five of these were further used for growth curve analysis in vitro, which showed a wide range of replication kinetics. The highest viral titers were associated with isolates from patients with dengue with warning signs and severe dengue cases. Full genome sequences of 21 DENV isolates were obtained. Genome analysis mapped the circulating DENV-2 strains to the Cosmopolitan genotype.
CONCLUSIONS: The replication kinetics of isolates from patients with mild or severe infection did not differ significantly, but the viral titers varied by two orders of magnitude between the isolates, suggesting differences in replication fitness among the circulating DENV-2.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1813 [PMID: 23657274]
  2. Lancet. 2014 Oct 11;384(9951):1358-65 [PMID: 25018116]
  3. Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549 [PMID: 29722887]
  4. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(12):e1003761 [PMID: 24348242]
  5. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Mar;74(3):449-56 [PMID: 16525106]
  6. Lancet. 1999 Oct 23;354(9188):1431-4 [PMID: 10543670]
  7. Genome Announc. 2018 Jun 21;6(25):null [PMID: 29930056]
  8. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May;98(5):1444-1459 [PMID: 29512482]
  9. Virol J. 2018 Aug 20;15(1):131 [PMID: 30126417]
  10. PeerJ. 2016 Aug 24;4:e2326 [PMID: 27635316]
  11. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Mar 16;10(3):e0004497 [PMID: 26982706]
  12. Virol J. 2015 Sep 22;12:148 [PMID: 26395339]
  13. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2014;67(2):132-4 [PMID: 24647259]
  14. Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):504-7 [PMID: 23563266]
  15. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Sep;91(3):611-20 [PMID: 25002298]
  16. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0192672 [PMID: 29470509]
  17. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Mar 15;10(3):e0004511 [PMID: 26977703]
  18. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 May 09;10(5):e0004704 [PMID: 27159058]
  19. Viruses. 2017 Jun 06;9(6): [PMID: 28587300]
  20. Vaccine. 2015 Dec 10;33(50):7100-11 [PMID: 26475445]
  21. J Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 15;189(6):990-1000 [PMID: 14999601]
  22. J Infect Dis. 2000 Jan;181(1):2-9 [PMID: 10608744]
  23. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 20;8(1):4900 [PMID: 29559699]
  24. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Feb 12;10(2):e0004445 [PMID: 26871560]
  25. J Mol Diagn. 2009 Nov;11(6):537-42 [PMID: 19815693]
  26. J Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;213(9):1428-35 [PMID: 26704615]
  27. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e56391 [PMID: 23520453]
  28. Viruses. 2011 Sep;3(9):1739-56 [PMID: 21994804]
  29. Mol Biol Rep. 2011 Nov;38(8):4979-83 [PMID: 21161397]
  30. PLoS Pathog. 2018 Jul 13;14(7):e1007187 [PMID: 30005085]
  31. Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 05;7:45505 [PMID: 28378782]
  32. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 27;18(1):346 [PMID: 30053833]
  33. J Virol. 2011 Jun;85(11):5374-83 [PMID: 21450836]
  34. Virology. 1997 Apr 14;230(2):300-8 [PMID: 9143286]
  35. J Med Virol. 2015 Jan;87(1):68-75 [PMID: 24889214]
  36. Viral Immunol. 2010 Jun;23(3):259-84 [PMID: 20565291]
  37. J Infect Dis. 1997 Jun;175(6):1497-501 [PMID: 9180193]
  38. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):712-723 [PMID: 26874619]
  39. Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Jan 10;3:44 [PMID: 30167467]
  40. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;36(11):2273-2279 [PMID: 28756561]
  41. Sci Transl Med. 2011 Dec 21;3(114):114ra128 [PMID: 22190239]
  42. J Comput Biol. 2013 Oct;20(10):714-37 [PMID: 24093227]
  43. Virol J. 2011 Aug 11;8:398 [PMID: 21835036]
  44. PLoS Pathog. 2018 Feb 26;14(2):e1006934 [PMID: 29481552]
  45. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(8):2480-5 [PMID: 17522268]
  46. Microbes Infect. 2010 Jul;12(7):546-54 [PMID: 20381635]
  47. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Feb 21;11(2):e0005395 [PMID: 28222130]
  48. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Jun 27;8:219 [PMID: 29998087]
  49. J Med Virol. 2013 Jul;85(7):1258-66 [PMID: 23595687]
  50. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013 Jul 5;436(3):478-85 [PMID: 23756811]
  51. J Virol. 2012 Dec;86(24):13808-9 [PMID: 23166230]
  52. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0196311 [PMID: 29694440]
  53. Vaccine. 2017 Oct 9;35(42):5535-5542 [PMID: 28893477]
  54. Arch Virol. 2011 Nov;156(11):2023-32 [PMID: 21922323]
  55. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 4;115(36):E8378-E8387 [PMID: 30127007]
  56. J Virol. 1999 Jun;73(6):4738-47 [PMID: 10233934]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. IA/I/13/1/500901/DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance
  3. IA/S(I)/14/1/501291/DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance

MeSH Term

Animals
Base Sequence
Child
Culicidae
Dengue
Dengue Virus
Genome, Viral
Genotype
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
India
Pediatrics
Phylogeny
RNA, Viral

Chemicals

RNA, Viral

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsisolatesDENVreplicationdengueviralkineticsDENV-2vitrofitnessvirusesisolatedusedgrowthclinicalcurveanalysistitersseverecirculatingvirusOBJECTIVE:characterizediversityphylogenyIndianMETHODS:wholebloodcollectedpassagingcellculturePassage3C6/36mosquitocellsParalleleffortsalsofocusedisolationRNAplasmasamplesprocessednext-generationsequencingRESULTS:possibleisolate64mostlyTwenty-fiveshowedwiderangehighestassociatedwarningsignscasesFullgenomesequences21obtainedGenomemappedstrainsCosmopolitangenotypeCONCLUSIONS:mildinfectiondiffersignificantlyvariedtwoordersmagnitudesuggestingdifferencesamongIsolationmolecularcharacterizationpediatricNewDelhiDengueGenotypeGrowthMutationsPhylogenetics

Similar Articles

Cited By