Representing agriculture in Earth System Models: approaches and priorities for development.

S S McDermid, L O Mearns, A C Ruane
Author Information
  1. S S McDermid: Dept. of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY, USA. ORCID
  2. L O Mearns: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
  3. A C Ruane: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Earth System Model (ESM) advances now enable improved representations of spatially and temporally varying anthropogenic climate forcings. One critical forcing is global agriculture, which is now extensive in land-use and intensive in management, owing to 20 century development trends. Agriculture and food systems now contribute nearly 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions and require copious inputs and resources, such as fertilizer, water, and land. Much uncertainty remains in quantifying important agriculture-climate interactions, including surface moisture and energy balances and biogeochemical cycling. Despite these externalities and uncertainties, agriculture is increasingly being leveraged to function as a net sink of anthropogenic carbon, and there is much emphasis on future sustainable intensification. Given its significance as a major environmental and climate forcing, there now exist a variety of approaches to represent agriculture in ESMs. These approaches are reviewed herein, and range from idealized representations of agricultural extent to the development of coupled climate-crop models that capture dynamic feedbacks. We highlight the robust agriculture-climate interactions and responses identified by these modeling efforts, as well as existing uncertainties and model limitations. To this end, coordinated and benchmarking assessments of land-use-climate feedbacks can be leveraged for further improvements in ESM's agricultural representations. We suggest key areas for continued model development, including incorporating irrigation and biogeochemical cycling in particular. Lastly, we pose several critical research questions to guide future work. Our review focuses on ESM representations of climate-surface interactions over managed agricultural lands, rather than on ESMs as an estimation tool for crop yields and productivity.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3268-73 [PMID: 24344314]
  2. Nature. 2014 Nov 20;515(7527):398-401 [PMID: 25409830]
  3. Nature. 2010 Feb 11;463(7282):747-56 [PMID: 20148028]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 31;109(31):12302-8 [PMID: 22826253]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108(11):4307-12 [PMID: 21368189]
  6. Nature. 2012 Aug 9;488(7410):197-200 [PMID: 22874965]
  7. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Sep;19(9):2893-906 [PMID: 23529747]
  8. Nature. 2016 Apr 7;532(7597):49-57 [PMID: 27078564]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 8;111(27):9757-61 [PMID: 24958872]
  10. Science. 2014 May 2;344(6183):508-9 [PMID: 24762538]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 25;96(11):5995-6000 [PMID: 10339530]
  12. Nature. 2009 Sep 24;461(7263):472-5 [PMID: 19779433]
  13. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3270-90 [PMID: 24700759]
  14. Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):758-62 [PMID: 12730592]
  15. Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Mar;22(3):1299-314 [PMID: 26473512]
  16. Geosci Model Dev. 2016;9(12):4521-4545 [PMID: 29697697]
  17. Science. 2005 Dec 9;310(5754):1625-6 [PMID: 16339435]
  18. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Dec;19(12):3648-67 [PMID: 23893426]
  19. Science. 2008 May 16;320(5878):889-92 [PMID: 18487183]
  20. Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):254-7 [PMID: 22932270]
  21. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Feb;124(2):A30-5 [PMID: 26829816]
  22. Nature. 2015 Sep 17;525(7569):367-71 [PMID: 26381985]
  23. J Environ Qual. 2003 Jan-Feb;32(1):247-68 [PMID: 12549565]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13268-72 [PMID: 17686990]
  25. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 May 28;369(1943):2058-72 [PMID: 21502176]
  26. Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4 [PMID: 16040698]
  27. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 27;363(1492):789-813 [PMID: 17827109]
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):12052-7 [PMID: 20551223]
  29. Nature. 2011 Oct 12;478(7369):337-42 [PMID: 21993620]
  30. Nature. 2014 Nov 20;515(7527):394-7 [PMID: 25409829]
  31. Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):51-9 [PMID: 26595273]
  32. Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1289-91 [PMID: 21885781]
  33. Nature. 2010 Oct 21;467(7318):951-4 [PMID: 20935626]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):4997-5001 [PMID: 19289836]
  35. Nature. 2009 Aug 20;460(7258):999-1002 [PMID: 19675570]
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106(24):9586-9 [PMID: 19487669]
  37. Nature. 2006 Mar 9;440(7081):165-73 [PMID: 16525463]
  38. J Environ Manage. 2015 Jan 15;148:21-30 [PMID: 24680541]
  39. Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):238-40 [PMID: 26185232]
  40. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 29;360(1463):2095-108 [PMID: 16433096]
  41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19627-32 [PMID: 21081701]
  42. New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1537-1551 [PMID: 25382456]

Grants

  1. /Goddard Space Flight Center NASA
  2. N-999999/Intramural NASA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interactionsnowrepresentationsagriculturedevelopmentEarthSystemclimateapproachesagriculturalESManthropogeniccriticalforcingglobalAgriculturesystemsagriculture-climateincludingbiogeochemicalcyclinguncertaintiesleveragedfutureESMsmodelsfeedbacksmodelModeladvancesenableimprovedspatiallytemporallyvaryingforcingsOneextensiveland-useintensivemanagementowing20centurytrendsfoodcontributenearly30%greenhousegasemissionsrequirecopiousinputsresourcesfertilizerwaterlandMuchuncertaintyremainsquantifyingimportantsurfacemoistureenergybalancesDespiteexternalitiesincreasinglyfunctionnetsinkcarbonmuchemphasissustainableintensificationGivensignificancemajorenvironmentalexistvarietyrepresentreviewedhereinrangeidealizedextentcoupledclimate-cropcapturedynamichighlightrobustresponsesidentifiedmodelingeffortswellexistinglimitationsendcoordinatedbenchmarkingassessmentsland-use-climatecanimprovementsESM'ssuggestkeyareascontinuedincorporatingirrigationparticularLastlyposeseveralresearchquestionsguideworkreviewfocusesclimate-surfacemanagedlandsratherestimationtoolcropyieldsproductivityRepresentingModels:priorities0315Biosphere/atmosphere0402Agricultural0429Climatedynamics3322Land/atmosphere3337GlobalDynamicVegetationModelsLandSurface

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)