Ling Chen, Junjun Liu, Hailong Yang, Hui Ma, Hui Wang, Yun Huang, Hao Cheng, Dianzhen Tang, Miao Liu, Houyuan Luo, Haitao Qu, Diwen Shen, Ning Zhang
BACKGROUND: Burn-out among doctors threatens their own health, and that of their patients. To identify risk factors of the doctor burn-out is vital to improving their health and increasing the quality of healthcare services. This study aims to explore the relationship between work-family conflict (WFC) and burn-out among Chinese doctors and the mediating role of coping styles in this relationship.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in China, with a questionnaire packet which consisted of the Chinese Maslach Burnout Inventory (CMBI), WFC Scale and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). A total of 2530 doctors participated in the survey. Correlation analysis was performed to explore the relationship between CMBI, WFC and SCSQ scores. A linear regression model was set to determine the mediating role of coping styles on the relationship between WFC and burn-out.
RESULTS: Doctors who had higher scores on work interfering with family conflict, reported more emotional exhaustion (r=0.514, P<0.001) and had a sense of accomplishment (r=-0.149, P<0.001). Simultaneously, family interfering with work (FIW) was positively associated with all dimensions of burn-out (r=0.213, 0.504, 0.088, respectively, P<0.001). Coping styles had partial, complete and even mediating effects on the relationship between WFC and burn-out among Chinese doctors.
CONCLUSIONS: WFC was correlated with burn-out, and coping style was a mediator in this relationship among Chinese doctors. Coping style was a positive resource against burn-out.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422
[PMID:
11148311]
Am J Med. 2001 Aug;111(2):170-5
[PMID:
11498074]
Aging Ment Health. 2009 Mar;13(2):300-7
[PMID:
19347697]
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):184-90
[PMID:
19467822]
JAMA. 2009 Sep 23;302(12):1284-93
[PMID:
19773563]
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Sep;79(9):590-7
[PMID:
19895513]
Psychol Rep. 2010 Feb;106(1):19-26
[PMID:
20402422]
Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;146(2):211-7
[PMID:
21339435]
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 18;11:240
[PMID:
21501467]
Ind Health. 2012;50(4):279-87
[PMID:
22673361]
J Occup Health. 2012;54(3):232-40
[PMID:
22790526]
Psychol Health. 2001 Sep;16(5):583-94
[PMID:
22804500]
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 29;12:915
[PMID:
23107113]
Vet Rec. 2014 Feb 8;174(6):144
[PMID:
24306199]
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e103242
[PMID:
25050618]
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014 Dec;27(6):980-92
[PMID:
25503892]
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115799
[PMID:
25541990]
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0122128
[PMID:
25898257]
J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 15;184:67-71
[PMID:
26072315]
Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;30(6):701-8
[PMID:
26141375]
J Health Psychol. 2017 Dec;22(14):1799-1807
[PMID:
27030731]
Mo Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;113(1):16-8
[PMID:
27039483]
Health Promot Perspect. 2016 Mar 31;6(1):31-6
[PMID:
27123434]
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2016 Apr;4(2):107-18
[PMID:
27218108]
World Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;15(2):103-11
[PMID:
27265691]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2016 Mar-Apr;72(2):129-36
[PMID:
27336957]
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Oct;204(10):778-786
[PMID:
27441462]
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 01;11(8):e0157013
[PMID:
27479002]
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
[PMID:
3806354]
J Occup Med. 1974 Oct;16(10):659-61
[PMID:
4452911]