Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.

Bo-Yeong Won, Mary Kosoyan, Joy J Geng
Author Information
  1. Bo-Yeong Won: Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.
  2. Mary Kosoyan: Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.
  3. Joy J Geng: Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.

Abstract

Decades of research in attention have shown that salient distractors (e.g., a color singleton) tend to capture attention. However, in most studies, singleton distractors are just as likely to be present as absent. We therefore have little knowledge of how probabilistic expectations of the salient distractor's occurrence and features affect suppression. In three experiments, we explored this question by manipulating the frequency of a singleton distractor and the variability of its color within a search display. We found that increased expectations regarding the occurrence of the singleton distractor eliminated the singleton response time cost and reduced the number of first saccades to the singleton. In contrast, expectations regarding variability in the singleton color did not affect singleton capture. This was surprising and suggests the ability to suppress second-order salience over and above that of first-order features. We next inserted the probe display that included a to-be-reported letter inside each shape between search trials to measure if attention went to multiple objects. The letter in the singleton location was reported less often in the high-frequency condition, suggesting proactive suppression of expected singleton. Additionally, we found that trial-to-trial repetitions of a singleton (irrespective of its color and location) facilitated performance (i.e., singleton repetition priming), but repetitions of its specific color or location did not. Together our findings demonstrate that attentional capture by a color singleton distractor is attenuated by probabilistic expectations of its occurrence, but not of its color and location. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

References

  1. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e16243 [PMID: 21386896]
  2. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):13-17 [PMID: 29309194]
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):87-99 [PMID: 22428675]
  4. J Vis. 2014 Jan 01;14(5):6 [PMID: 24819737]
  5. Cortex. 2018 May;102:67-95 [PMID: 29096874]
  6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):485-499 [PMID: 29230673]
  7. Percept Psychophys. 1996 Oct;58(7):977-91 [PMID: 8920835]
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):871-8 [PMID: 22696250]
  9. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 May;80(4):860-870 [PMID: 29476331]
  10. Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jun;29(6):317-22 [PMID: 16697058]
  11. Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):184-93 [PMID: 1945740]
  12. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):184-9 [PMID: 12015235]
  13. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68 [PMID: 7790827]
  14. Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):741-53 [PMID: 12201333]
  15. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90 [PMID: 24203555]
  16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 09;368(1628):20130055 [PMID: 24018717]
  17. Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96 [PMID: 8008550]
  18. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1590-605 [PMID: 22893004]
  19. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jul;44(7):1128-1141 [PMID: 29733673]
  20. eNeuro. 2016 Oct 5;3(5): [PMID: 27822505]
  21. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):1-16 [PMID: 19170466]
  22. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):601-21 [PMID: 6238122]
  23. Vision Res. 2008 May;48(11):1315-26 [PMID: 18407311]
  24. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):65-70 [PMID: 15116988]
  25. Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):520-5 [PMID: 12430835]
  26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44 [PMID: 1431742]
  27. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Apr;44(4):626-644 [PMID: 29035072]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):764-87 [PMID: 17683227]
  29. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222 [PMID: 7605061]
  30. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1087-1096 [PMID: 28160238]
  31. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):79-92 [PMID: 29191511]
  32. Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):510-5 [PMID: 12930485]
  33. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):106-13 [PMID: 22245618]
  34. Curr Biol. 2004 May 4;14(9):744-51 [PMID: 15120065]
  35. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):5-18 [PMID: 20045875]
  36. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 [PMID: 9176953]
  37. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):45-62 [PMID: 27804032]
  38. Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72 [PMID: 7808275]
  39. Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(4):621-31 [PMID: 21188362]
  40. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1039-60 [PMID: 16262497]
  41. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25 [PMID: 7367577]
  42. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):419-33 [PMID: 2527952]
  43. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4 [PMID: 22468723]
  44. Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606 [PMID: 1620571]
  45. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2275-2298 [PMID: 28733838]
  46. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Apr;7(2):255-61 [PMID: 9142748]
  47. J Vis. 2011 Nov 10;11(13): [PMID: 22076486]
  48. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):847-58 [PMID: 9627420]
  49. Percept Psychophys. 2003 Oct;65(7):999-1010 [PMID: 14674628]
  50. J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 6;26(36):9239-49 [PMID: 16957080]
  51. Percept Psychophys. 2005 Oct;67(7):1252-68 [PMID: 16502846]
  52. J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):988-1000 [PMID: 26791226]
  53. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  54. Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):499-505 [PMID: 12430832]
  55. Neural Netw. 2010 Jun;23(5):649-66 [PMID: 20080025]
  56. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):897-903 [PMID: 21691926]
  57. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99 [PMID: 20507828]
  58. Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1740-50 [PMID: 26420441]
  59. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37 [PMID: 19293088]
  60. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1021-35 [PMID: 14585020]
  61. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1003-20 [PMID: 14585019]
  62. Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):476-85 [PMID: 26893292]
  63. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:269-97 [PMID: 9046562]
  64. J Neurosci. 2006 Dec 6;26(49):12631-2 [PMID: 17152680]

Grants

  1. R01 MH113855/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Anticipation, Psychological
Attention
Color Perception
Eye Movement Measurements
Female
Humans
Male
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Repetition Priming
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0singletoncolorexpectationslocationattentioncaptureprobabilisticoccurrencesuppressiondistractorsalientdistractorsefeaturesaffectvariabilitysearchdisplayfoundregardingsecond-orderletterrepetitionsDecadesresearchshowngtendHoweverstudiesjustlikelypresentabsentthereforelittleknowledgedistractor'sthreeexperimentsexploredquestionmanipulatingfrequencywithinincreasedeliminatedresponsetimecostreducednumberfirstsaccadescontrastsurprisingsuggestsabilitysuppresssaliencefirst-ordernextinsertedprobeincludedto-be-reportedinsideshapetrialsmeasurewentmultipleobjectsreportedlessoftenhigh-frequencyconditionsuggestingproactiveexpectedAdditionallytrial-to-trialirrespectivefacilitatedperformanceirepetitionprimingspecificTogetherfindingsdemonstrateattentionalattenuatedPsycINFODatabaseRecordc2018APArightsreservedEvidencebased

Similar Articles

Cited By