Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Freshwater Reservoirs: What Does the Atmosphere See?

Yves T Prairie, Jukka Alm, Jake Beaulieu, Nathan Barros, Tom Battin, Jonathan Cole, Paul Del Giorgio, Tonya DelSontro, Frédéric Guérin, Atle Harby, John Harrison, Sara Mercier-Blais, Dominique Serça, Sebastian Sobek, Dominic Vachon
Author Information
  1. Yves T Prairie: UNESCO Chair in Global Environmental Change, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  2. Jukka Alm: Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, Uusima, Finland.
  3. Jake Beaulieu: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  4. Nathan Barros: Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  5. Tom Battin: É cole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  6. Jonathan Cole: Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, USA.
  7. Paul Del Giorgio: Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  8. Tonya DelSontro: Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  9. Frédéric Guérin: Géos- ciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
  10. Atle Harby: SINTEF Energy Research, Trondheim, Norway.
  11. John Harrison: School of the Environment, Washington State University, Vancouver, Washington, USA.
  12. Sara Mercier-Blais: UNESCO Chair in Global Environmental Change, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  13. Dominique Serça: Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Ob- servatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France.
  14. Sebastian Sobek: Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  15. Dominic Vachon: Institute F.-A. Forel, Department of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

Freshwater reservoirs are a known source of greenhouse gas (GHG) to the atmosphere, but their quantitative significance is still only loosely con- strained. Although part of this uncertainty can be attributed to the difficulties in measuring highly variable fluxes, it is also the result of a lack of a clear accounting methodology, particularly about what constitutes new emissions and potential new sinks. In this paper, we review the main processes involved in the generation of GHG in reservoir systems and propose a simple approach to quantify the reservoir GHG footprint in terms of the net changes in GHG fluxes to the atmosphere induced by damming, that is, 'what the atmosphere sees.' The approach takes into account the pre-impoundment GHG balance of the landscape, the temporal evolution of reservoir GHG emission profile as well as the natural emissions that are displaced to or away from the reservoir site resulting from hydrological and other changes. It also clarifies the portion of the reservoir carbon burial that can potentially be considered an offset to GHG emissions.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 07;49(13):7614-22 [PMID: 26061185]
  2. Nature. 2010 Jul 22;466(7305):478-81 [PMID: 20651689]
  3. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jan 20;49(2):873-80 [PMID: 25514362]
  4. Nature. 2006 Nov 30;444(7119):524-5 [PMID: 17136056]
  5. Ambio. 2017 Sep;46(5):566-577 [PMID: 28074404]
  6. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Nov 15;598:959-972 [PMID: 28468122]
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 1;511:381-92 [PMID: 25555258]
  8. Ecology. 2010 Oct;91(10):2850-61 [PMID: 21058546]
  9. Nature. 2013 Nov 21;503(7476):355-9 [PMID: 24256802]
  10. Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Mar;21(3):1124-39 [PMID: 25220765]
  11. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Aug 6;47(15):8130-7 [PMID: 23799866]
  12. Nat Commun. 2017 May 17;8:15347 [PMID: 28513580]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19657-61 [PMID: 22089233]
  14. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Dec 16;48(24):14499-507 [PMID: 25409278]
  15. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Nov 17;49(22):13121-9 [PMID: 26477785]
  16. J Environ Qual. 2008 Oct 23;37(6):2037-47 [PMID: 18948456]
  17. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Apr 1;44(7):2419-25 [PMID: 20218543]
  18. Science. 2011 Jan 7;331(6013):50 [PMID: 21212349]
  19. Bioscience. 2016 Nov 1;66(11):949-964 [PMID: 32801383]
  20. Sci Total Environ. 2011 Nov 15;409(24):5382-91 [PMID: 21962559]
  21. Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Feb 7;51(3):1267-1277 [PMID: 28068068]
  22. Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Aug 1;36(15):3354-61 [PMID: 12188365]
  23. Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 30;5:5350 [PMID: 25355035]
  24. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 3;47(17):9604-11 [PMID: 23909506]
  25. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 1;45(23):9866-73 [PMID: 21985534]
  26. J Environ Manage. 2016 Oct 1;181:64-73 [PMID: 27315602]

Grants

  1. EPA999999/Intramural EPA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0GHGreservoiremissionsatmosphereFreshwaterreservoirscanfluxesalsonewapproachfootprintchangesburialknownsourcegreenhousegasquantitativesignificancestilllooselycon-strainedAlthoughpartuncertaintyattributeddifficultiesmeasuringhighlyvariableresultlackclearaccountingmethodologyparticularlyconstitutespotentialsinkspaperreviewmainprocessesinvolvedgenerationsystemsproposesimplequantifytermsnetinduceddamming'whatsees'takesaccountpre-impoundmentbalancelandscapetemporalevolutionemissionprofilewellnaturaldisplacedawaysiteresultinghydrologicalclarifiesportioncarbonpotentiallyconsideredoffsetGreenhouseGasEmissionsReservoirs:AtmosphereSee?CCO2CH4

Similar Articles

Cited By