Variation in mandible development and its relationship to dependence on parents across burying beetles.

Kyle M Benowitz, Madeline E Sparks, Elizabeth C McKinney, Patricia J Moore, Allen J Moore
Author Information
  1. Kyle M Benowitz: Department of Entomology University of Arizona Tucson Arizona. ORCID
  2. Madeline E Sparks: Department of Genetics University of Georgia Athens Georgia.
  3. Elizabeth C McKinney: Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens Georgia.
  4. Patricia J Moore: Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens Georgia. ORCID
  5. Allen J Moore: Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens Georgia. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In species with parental care, there is striking variation in offspring dependence at birth, ranging from feeding independence to complete dependency on parents for nutrition. Frequently, highly dependent offspring further evolve reductions or alterations of morphological traits that would otherwise promote self-sufficiency. Here, we examine evidence for morphological evolution associated with dependence in burying beetles ( spp.), in which dependence upon parents appears to have several independent origins. In many species, precocial first instar larvae can survive without parenting, but several altricial species die at this stage on their own. We focused specifically on the mandibles, which are expected to be related to feeding ability and therefore independence from parents.
RESULTS: We find no evidence that the size of the mandible is related to dependence on parents. However, we do find a developmental and phylogenetic correlation between independence and the presence of serrations on the inner edge of the mandible. Mandibles of independent species bear serrations at hatching, whereas dependent species hatch with smooth mandibles, only developing serrations in the second instar when these larvae gain the ability to survive on their own. Phylogenetic evidence suggests that serrations coincide with independence repeatedly. We note a single exception to this trend, a beetle with a serrated mandible that cannot survive without parents. However, this exception occurs in a species that has recently evolved the loss of independence.
CONCLUSIONS: We argue that the absence of mandible serrations occurs due to alternative selection pressures incurred in larvae dependent upon parents to survive. We suggest that this may have led to a variable function for mandibles, perhaps related to increased competitive ability among siblings or increased efficiency in receiving nutrition from parents. Furthermore, we propose that the phylogenetic pattern we see is consistent with the long-held evolutionary hypothesis that evolutionary change in behavior and physiology precede morphological change.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.6hp93cd

References

  1. Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45 [PMID: 12778543]
  2. Front Zool. 2018 Aug 29;15:33 [PMID: 30279721]
  3. Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 21;8(24):12832-12840 [PMID: 30619586]
  4. Bioessays. 2013 Feb;35(2):100-7 [PMID: 23255216]
  5. J Evol Biol. 2015 Feb;28(2):503-9 [PMID: 25522811]
  6. Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Sep;92(9):431-4 [PMID: 16086188]
  7. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:595-618 [PMID: 15012399]
  8. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Dec;69(3):552-65 [PMID: 23911726]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1773-7 [PMID: 12964978]
  10. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 26;281(1781):20132840 [PMID: 24573846]
  11. Evolution. 1998 Apr;52(2):415-431 [PMID: 28568329]
  12. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 05;6:29323 [PMID: 27378180]
  13. Zoolog Sci. 2008 Dec;25(12):1190-8 [PMID: 19267645]
  14. Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Mar;7(3):88-91 [PMID: 21235963]
  15. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 Jun;15(3):390-402 [PMID: 10860648]
  16. Am Nat. 2019 Feb;193(2):296-308 [PMID: 30720366]
  17. Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):96-110 [PMID: 11913669]
  18. Evol Dev. 2016 Jul;18(4):229-44 [PMID: 27402569]
  19. Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 28;9(1):3987 [PMID: 30266903]
  20. Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):860-4 [PMID: 22837386]
  21. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):487-96 [PMID: 19500875]
  22. R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jun 20;5(6):180189 [PMID: 30110489]
  23. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1979 Aug;54(3):269-90 [PMID: 389304]
  24. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Jul;1(7):0178 [PMID: 28685165]
  25. Curr Biol. 2014 Oct 20;24(20):2428-34 [PMID: 25283779]
  26. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2016 Dec;119(4):1082-1088 [PMID: 28025585]
  27. Am Nat. 2004 Jul;164(1):13-24 [PMID: 15266367]
  28. Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):131-141 [PMID: 10413549]

Grants

  1. T32 GM007103/NIGMS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0parentsspeciesdependenceindependencemandibleserrationssurvivedependentmorphologicalevidencelarvaemandiblesrelatedabilityparentalcareoffspringfeedingnutritionburyingbeetlesuponseveralindependentinstarwithoutfindHoweverphylogeneticexceptionoccursincreasedevolutionarychangeBACKGROUND:strikingvariationbirthrangingcompletedependencyFrequentlyhighlyevolvereductionsalterationstraitsotherwisepromoteself-sufficiencyexamineevolutionassociatedsppappearsoriginsmanyprecocialfirstcanparentingaltricialdiestagefocusedspecificallyexpectedthereforeRESULTS:sizedevelopmentalcorrelationpresenceinneredgeMandiblesbearhatchingwhereashatchsmoothdevelopingsecondgainPhylogeneticsuggestscoinciderepeatedlynotesingletrendbeetleserratedrecentlyevolvedlossCONCLUSIONS:argueabsenceduealternativeselectionpressuresincurredsuggestmayledvariablefunctionperhapscompetitiveamongsiblingsefficiencyreceivingFurthermoreproposepatternseeconsistentlong-heldhypothesisbehaviorphysiologyprecedeVariationdevelopmentrelationshipacrossNicrophorusbehavior/morphologycorrelationsheterochronymouthparts

Similar Articles

Cited By