Citations in scientific articles: possibly biased reflections on the field of diagnostic imaging.

Benedikt Sundermann
Author Information
  1. Benedikt Sundermann: Institute of Clinical Radiology, Medical Faculty - University of Muenster - and University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. benedikt.sundermann@uni-muenster.de. ORCID

Abstract

This Editorial Comment refers to the article "Citation Bias in Imaging Research: Are studies with higher diagnostic accuracy estimates cited more often?" by Frank RA, Sharifabadi AD, Salameh JP et al, Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5801-8 [1].

References

  1. Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1657-1664 [PMID: 30443756]
  2. Science. 2012 Feb 3;335(6068):542-3 [PMID: 22301307]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 4;114(14):3714-3719 [PMID: 28320937]
  4. BMJ. 2009 Jul 20;339:b2680 [PMID: 19622839]
  5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):1020-1026 [PMID: 30288671]
  6. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 11;11(11):e0166570 [PMID: 27835703]
  7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;66(3):296-301 [PMID: 23347853]
  8. Nat Methods. 2013 Nov;10(11):1045 [PMID: 24173378]

MeSH Term

Bias
Diagnostic Imaging

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diagnosticEditorialCommentrefersarticle"CitationBiasImagingResearch:studieshigheraccuracyestimatescitedoften?"FrankRASharifabadiADSalamehJPetalEurRadiol2018Nov15https://doiorg/101007/s00330-018-5801-8[1]Citationsscientificarticles:possiblybiasedreflectionsfieldimaging

Similar Articles

Cited By