Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?

Ilan Z Kafka, Stanislav Kocherov, Jawdat Jaber, Boris Chertin
Author Information
  1. Ilan Z Kafka: Departments of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, P.O.B 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.
  2. Stanislav Kocherov: Departments of Pediatric Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
  3. Jawdat Jaber: Departments of Pediatric Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
  4. Boris Chertin: Departments of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, P.O.B 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel. boris.chertin@gmail.com. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: RALP is rapidly becoming the new gold standard treatment for UPJO in children, who suffer from uretero-pelvic obstruction (UPJO). However, presently there is a lack of data regarding the outcomes of RALP in young infants and smaller children. This study aims to compare the outcomes of RALP in children weighing less than 10 kg and matched with an analogous cohort who underwent open pyeloplasty (OP).
METHODS: We prospectively compared patients who underwent RALP to a matched cohort of patients who underwent OP from our retrospectively acquired data registry. Comparative outcomes included: Demographics, success rate, complications, and length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score and failure rate. Failure was defined as the need for a secondary intervention for UPJO, or worsening hydronephrosis during follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 15 patients with a median age of 8 months (range 5-11 months) and median weight 7 kg (range 5.6-9.8 kg) underwent RALP between 2016 and 2018, a matched cohort of 15 children who underwent OP similar in terms of age, weight, gender and affected side between 2014 and 2016. All children had prenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis and underwent surgery utilizing combined general and regional (Caudal MO) anesthesia. Intrinsic obstruction was present in 13 of RALP group (86.7%) and in 14 in OP group (93.3%). Mean operative time was 67.8 + 13.4 min in RALP group, while 66.5 + 9.5 min in OP group. (p = 0.76) All but two patients in RALP group had stent inserted and required subsequent anesthesia for stent removal, while all OP children had a Salle Pyeloplasty stent inserted during the procedure and underwent removal in an ambulatory setting without the need for anesthesia. There were no failures recorded in the RALP group, while one patient in OP required a secondary intervention. Mean hospital stay was 1 day (1-2 days) for RALP and 2 days (2-3 days) for OP. There was no difference in FLACC Pain Scale in both groups. Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications occurred in one patient from each group. Two patients from RALP underwent subsequent ureteral reimplantation due to accompanying uretero-vescical junction obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that RALP can be performed safely in pediatric patients weighing less than 10 kg. with similar outcomes when compared to patients undergoing an open procedure for the same pathology.

Keywords

References

  1. BJU Int. 2000 Mar;85(4):408-11 [PMID: 10691815]
  2. BJU Int. 2001 Mar;87(4):287-9 [PMID: 11251517]
  3. J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):1127-30 [PMID: 12187251]
  4. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1065-9; discussion 1069 [PMID: 12576847]
  5. Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):260-4 [PMID: 15708034]
  6. J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):683-7; discussion 687 [PMID: 16407025]
  7. Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):734-8 [PMID: 16504374]
  8. Br J Urol. 1949 Sep;21(3):209-14 [PMID: 18148283]
  9. J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Aug;4(4):275-9 [PMID: 18644529]
  10. J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Oct;5(5):368-73 [PMID: 19369118]
  11. J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):704-8 [PMID: 20022046]
  12. J Endourol. 2011 Feb;25(2):179-85 [PMID: 21241192]
  13. J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1455-60 [PMID: 21334663]
  14. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6 Suppl):2517-22 [PMID: 21555027]
  15. J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):522-7 [PMID: 22177178]
  16. J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Apr;9(2):161-8 [PMID: 22321813]
  17. Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Apr;4(2):57-60 [PMID: 22496708]
  18. J Urol. 2013 Jul;190(1):244-50 [PMID: 23276511]
  19. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):858-65 [PMID: 23583146]
  20. J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2221-6 [PMID: 23911637]
  21. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):139.e1-5 [PMID: 26052000]
  22. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Aug;11(4):175.e1-5 [PMID: 26189590]
  23. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(7-8):E453-7 [PMID: 26279715]
  24. Curr Urol. 2016 Oct;9(3):132-137 [PMID: 27867330]
  25. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Sep;33(9):925-935 [PMID: 28365863]
  26. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995 Aug;9(4):503-9 [PMID: 7577420]
  27. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1997 Oct;44(5):1299-321 [PMID: 9326963]

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Infant
Kidney Pelvis
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Male
Operative Time
Prospective Studies
Plastic Surgery Procedures
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Treatment Outcome
Ureter
Ureteral Obstruction
Urologic Surgical Procedures

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RALPunderwentOPpatientsgroupchildrenoutcomesUPJOobstructiondatamatchedcohortpyeloplastyweightanesthesiastentdaysweighingless10 kgopencomparedratecomplicationshospitalstayneedsecondaryinterventionhydronephrosis15medianagemonthsrange2016similarMeaninsertedrequiredsubsequentremovalPyeloplastyprocedureonepatientPURPOSE:rapidlybecomingnewgoldstandardtreatmentsufferuretero-pelvicHoweverpresentlylackregardingyounginfantssmallerstudyaimscompareanalogousMETHODS:prospectivelyretrospectivelyacquiredregistryComparativeincluded:DemographicssuccesslengthpostoperativepainscorefailureFailuredefinedworseningfollow-upRESULTS:total85-117 kg56-98 kg2018termsgenderaffectedside2014prenataldiagnosissurgeryutilizingcombinedgeneralregionalCaudalMOIntrinsicpresent13867%14933%operativetime678 + 134 min665 + 95 minp = 076twoSalleambulatorysettingwithoutfailuresrecorded1 day1-222-3differenceFLACCPainScalegroupsClavien-DindogradeI-IIoccurredTwoureteralreimplantationdueaccompanyinguretero-vescicaljunctionCONCLUSIONS:suggestcanperformedsafelypediatricundergoingpathologyPediatricrobotic-assistedlaparoscopic:matter?AntenatalhydronephrpsisRobotic

Similar Articles

Cited By