Proposal of a normative table for body fat percentages of Brazilian young adults through bioimpedanciometry.

Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco, Marcelo Picinin Bernuci, Déborah Cristina Marques, Isabelle Zanquetta Carvalho, Carlos Andrés Lopera Barrero, Fabiano Mendes de Oliveira, Gabriel Fassina Ladeia, Nelson Nardo Júnior
Author Information
  1. Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco: Research Group in Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Sports, Nutrition, and Performance (GEFFEND/UNICESUMAR), Maringa, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Marcelo Picinin Bernuci: Research Group in Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Sports, Nutrition, and Performance (GEFFEND/UNICESUMAR), Maringa, Brazil.
  3. Déborah Cristina Marques: Research Group in Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Sports, Nutrition, and Performance (GEFFEND/UNICESUMAR), Maringa, Brazil.
  4. Isabelle Zanquetta Carvalho: Research Group in Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Sports, Nutrition, and Performance (GEFFEND/UNICESUMAR), Maringa, Brazil.
  5. Carlos Andrés Lopera Barrero: State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil.
  6. Fabiano Mendes de Oliveira: Research Group in Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Sports, Nutrition, and Performance (GEFFEND/UNICESUMAR), Maringa, Brazil.
  7. Gabriel Fassina Ladeia: Research Group in Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Sports, Nutrition, and Performance (GEFFEND/UNICESUMAR), Maringa, Brazil.
  8. Nelson Nardo Júnior: State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil.

Abstract

Identification of the body fat (BF) percentage allows health professionals to detect healthy or risky patterns in a population. However, no studies have elaborated BF cutoff points using the bioelectrical impedance method in young Brazilian adults. Thus, the objective of the present study was to elaborate normative tables for BF in Brazilian men and women (sedentary and physically active) between 18 and 39 years of age. A total of 3,111 adults (958 men and 2,153 women) were evaluated using bioimpedance measurements with the InBody 520 device. The data were distributed normally and divided into percentiles (P, P, P, P, P, P, and P). The following values were observed: for men: P=8.9%-12.5%; P=12.6%-17.5%; P=17.6%-25.3%; P=25.4%-35.1%; P=35.2%-43.0%; P=43.1%-49.4% and P=49.5%; for women: P=18.7%-23.1%; P=23.2%-28.7%; P=28.8%-35.7%; P=35.8%-42.9%; P=43.0%-49.1%; P=49.2%-52.1% and P≥52.2%. These percentiles can be used to classify the adiposity of sedentary and physically active individuals evaluated by bioimpedanciometry.

Keywords

References

  1. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999 Jun;70(2):135-49 [PMID: 10380245]
  2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Sep;72(3):694-701 [PMID: 10966886]
  3. Ann Hum Biol. 2003 Jul-Aug;30(4):380-91 [PMID: 12881138]
  4. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Aug;78(2):228-35 [PMID: 12885702]
  5. Stat Med. 1992 Jul;11(10):1305-19 [PMID: 1518992]
  6. Clin Nutr. 2008 Feb;27(1):87-94 [PMID: 18206273]
  7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):3-13 [PMID: 19092709]
  8. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Feb;89(2):500-8 [PMID: 19116329]
  9. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Dec;207(6):928-34 [PMID: 19183541]
  10. Pediatrics. 2009 Sep;124 Suppl 1:S35-41 [PMID: 19720666]
  11. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Nov;2(6):1139-46 [PMID: 19885303]
  12. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012 Jul;45(7):591-600 [PMID: 22510779]
  13. J Obes. 2014;2014:271532 [PMID: 24669312]
  14. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015 Mar;35(2):81-97 [PMID: 24735332]
  15. Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766-81 [PMID: 24880830]
  16. Nutr Hosp. 2014 Dec 01;30(6):1270-8 [PMID: 25433108]
  17. Nutrition. 2015 Jan;31(1):127-31 [PMID: 25466656]
  18. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):91-111 [PMID: 25650632]
  19. Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):660-8 [PMID: 26035881]
  20. Curr Obes Rep. 2016 Dec;5(4):389-396 [PMID: 27591783]
  21. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 24;7(3):e011843 [PMID: 28341684]
  22. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017 Oct;24(5):310-314 [PMID: 28696961]
  23. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017 Nov 14;16:45 [PMID: 29164077]
  24. Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jun;177(6):1-12 [PMID: 29556792]
  25. BMJ. 2018 Mar 29;360:k1274 [PMID: 29599212]
  26. Rev Saude Publica. 2018 Apr 09;52:31 [PMID: 29641656]
  27. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Apr 26;14(2):168-174 [PMID: 29740548]
  28. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 18;19(1):233 [PMID: 30021590]
  29. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Aug 24;14(4):621-627 [PMID: 30276183]
  30. J Clin Densitom. 2018 Nov 3;:null [PMID: 30472111]
  31. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Dec 14;:null [PMID: 30557175]
  32. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Apr;45(4):717-24 [PMID: 3565298]
  33. Sports Med. 1996 Sep;22(3):146-56 [PMID: 8883212]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0P1%BFhealthBrazilianadults5%bodyfatusingyoungnormativemenwomensedentaryphysicallyactiveevaluatedpercentilesP=35P=43P=497%bioimpedanciometryIdentificationpercentageallowsprofessionalsdetecthealthyriskypatternspopulationHoweverstudieselaboratedcutoffpointsbioelectricalimpedancemethodThusobjectivepresentstudyelaboratetables1839yearsagetotal31119582153bioimpedancemeasurementsInBody520devicedatadistributednormallydividedfollowingvaluesobserved:men:P=89%-12P=126%-17P=176%-253%P=254%-352%-430%1%-494%women:P=187%-23P=232%-28P=288%-358%-429%0%-492%-52P≥522%canusedclassifyadiposityindividualsProposaltablepercentagesAdiposityMen’sObesityWomen’s

Similar Articles

Cited By