Effects of nicotine conditioning history on alcohol and methamphetamine self-administration in rats.

Patrick A Randall, Brayden Fortino, Y Wendy Huynh, Brady M Thompson, Christopher E Larsen, Mackenzie P Callen, Scott T Barrett, Jennifer E Murray, Rick A Bevins, Joyce Besheer
Author Information
  1. Patrick A Randall: Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  2. Brayden Fortino: Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  3. Y Wendy Huynh: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
  4. Brady M Thompson: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
  5. Christopher E Larsen: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
  6. Mackenzie P Callen: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
  7. Scott T Barrett: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
  8. Jennifer E Murray: Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
  9. Rick A Bevins: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
  10. Joyce Besheer: Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Curriculum in Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: jbesheer@med.unc.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking constitutes a significant public health risk. Alcohol and methamphetamine use disorders are also highly co-morbid with smoking, further increasing negative health outcomes. An important question in determining the underlying neurobiology of nicotine poly-drug use is understanding whether having a positive history with nicotine effects alters later drug-taking behavior.
METHODS: The current experiments sought to elucidate whether having an appetitive nicotine conditioning history would affect later alcohol or methamphetamine self-administration. Adult male and female Long-Evans rats were first trained on a discriminated goal-tracking task in which the interoceptive effects of nicotine predicted sucrose reinforcement. As a control, pseudo-conditioned groups were included that had equated nicotine and sucrose experience. Rats were then shifted to either alcohol self-administration or methamphetamine self-administration.
RESULTS: Nicotine conditioning history had no effect on acquisition or maintenance of alcohol self-administration in males or females. In contrast, an appetitive nicotine conditioning history decreased methamphetamine self-administration in female rats, but not males.
CONCLUSIONS: In female, but not male, rats, an appetitive conditioning history with nicotine decreases methamphetamine, but not alcohol, self-administration. This dissociation suggests that the effects may be due to a specific increase in the reinforcing value of methamphetamine. This may have implications for better understanding the progression of drug use from nicotine to methamphetamine.

References

  1. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;11:25 [PMID: 28275339]
  2. Neuropharmacology. 2017 Feb;113(Pt A):354-366 [PMID: 27765626]
  3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997 Nov;134(2):187-92 [PMID: 9399383]
  4. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Mar;142(4):408-12 [PMID: 10229066]
  5. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010 Dec;335(3):807-16 [PMID: 20847037]
  6. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Aug;233(15-16):3061-74 [PMID: 27334469]
  7. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2010 Mar;9(1):60-76 [PMID: 20201817]
  8. Addict Behav. 2004 Jan;29(1):89-106 [PMID: 14667423]
  9. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jan 1;106(1):72-8 [PMID: 19733448]
  10. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Jun;10(6):995-1008 [PMID: 18584463]
  11. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2014 Aug 20;5(8):624-31 [PMID: 25010473]
  12. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jan 11;93(1-2):63-71 [PMID: 17961933]
  13. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987 May;27(1):15-20 [PMID: 3615536]
  14. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):274-85 [PMID: 16362402]
  15. Nebr Symp Motiv. 2009;55:91-109 [PMID: 19013940]
  16. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2017 May;156:1-9 [PMID: 28347737]
  17. Neuropharmacology. 2017 Jul 15;121:111-119 [PMID: 28457971]
  18. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Nov;96(1-2):185-8 [PMID: 9821554]
  19. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jan;234(2):187-198 [PMID: 27695921]
  20. Neuropharmacology. 2014 Nov;86:181-91 [PMID: 25080073]
  21. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Jan;34(2):266-81 [PMID: 18418357]
  22. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Nov;189(1):27-36 [PMID: 17019569]
  23. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2013 Dec;114-115:82-9 [PMID: 24201046]
  24. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Apr 30;561(1-3):91-104 [PMID: 17343849]
  25. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Nov;96(1-2):189-94 [PMID: 9821555]
  26. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Oct;231(20):4019-29 [PMID: 24696081]
  27. Prague Med Rep. 2009;110(1):67-78 [PMID: 19591380]
  28. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jun 15;89(1):52-9 [PMID: 17240084]
  29. Behav Neurosci. 2009 Feb;123(1):97-108 [PMID: 19170434]
  30. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug 17;11:153 [PMID: 28860980]
  31. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Sep;37(10):2277-84 [PMID: 22617358]
  32. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Mar;37(4):876-84 [PMID: 22048468]
  33. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 May;32(5):1098-108 [PMID: 17091131]
  34. Neurosci Lett. 2017 Nov 1;660:122-129 [PMID: 28917981]
  35. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Jan;171(2):173-8 [PMID: 13680077]
  36. Behav Pharmacol. 2007 Dec;18(8):707-16 [PMID: 17989508]

Grants

  1. R21 DA039356/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Conditioning, Operant
Ethanol
Female
Male
Methamphetamine
Nicotine
Rats
Rats, Long-Evans
Self Administration

Chemicals

Ethanol
Methamphetamine
Nicotine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nicotinemethamphetamineself-administrationhistoryconditioningalcoholratsuseeffectsappetitivefemalehealthunderstandingwhetherlatermalesucrosemalesmayBACKGROUND:SmokingconstitutessignificantpublicriskAlcoholdisordersalsohighlyco-morbidsmokingincreasingnegativeoutcomesimportantquestiondeterminingunderlyingneurobiologypoly-drugpositivealtersdrug-takingbehaviorMETHODS:currentexperimentssoughtelucidateaffectAdultLong-Evansfirsttraineddiscriminatedgoal-trackingtaskinteroceptivepredictedreinforcementcontrolpseudo-conditionedgroupsincludedequatedexperienceRatsshiftedeitherRESULTS:NicotineeffectacquisitionmaintenancefemalescontrastdecreasedCONCLUSIONS:decreasesdissociationsuggestsduespecificincreasereinforcingvalueimplicationsbetterprogressiondrugEffects

Similar Articles

Cited By