The impact of the national action plan on the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance among 352,238 isolates in a teaching hospital in China from 2015 to 2018.

Shanjuan Wang, Yanhong Jessika Hu, Paul Little, Yifei Wang, Qing Chang, Xudong Zhou, Michael Moore, Joseph Irvin Harwell
Author Information
  1. Shanjuan Wang: 1Shanghai General Practice Medical Education and Research Center, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, No 1 Chengbei Rd, Jiading, Shanghai, 201800 China.
  2. Yanhong Jessika Hu: 2School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, G/F, Patrick Manson Building (North Wing), 7 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
  3. Paul Little: 3Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK.
  4. Yifei Wang: 1Shanghai General Practice Medical Education and Research Center, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, No 1 Chengbei Rd, Jiading, Shanghai, 201800 China.
  5. Qing Chang: 1Shanghai General Practice Medical Education and Research Center, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, No 1 Chengbei Rd, Jiading, Shanghai, 201800 China.
  6. Xudong Zhou: 4School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058 Zhejiang China.
  7. Michael Moore: 3Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK.
  8. Joseph Irvin Harwell: 5Clinical Science Team, Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA 02127 USA.

Abstract

Background: We sought to understand the epidemiology and characteristics of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the impact of the National Action Plan (NAP) on AMR. This information will be critical to develop interventions and strengthen antibiotic stewardship in hospital settings in China.
Methods: Cross-sectional data collection from the hospital information management system from 1 January 2015 to 30 August 2018. Variables included patient age, sex, diagnosis, hospital department and antibiotic sensitivity test. T-test for two samples method was applied to compare the results before and after NAP implementation. Multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the associations of risk factors for antimicrobial resistance.
Results: In total there were 352,238 isolates in the final analysis after excluding contamination strains and isolates with incomplete information. More than 50% of patients were > 66 years old. 62% were male. 40% of the total samples were sputum. Among the total sample, the total resistance rate was 42% among all isolates. The rate of resistance to all antibiotics declined by 5.3% (95% CI 4.96-5.64%,  < 0.0001) and culture positivity rate declined by 9.8% (95% CI 9.22-10.34%,  < 0.0001) after NAP. Logistical regression showed that the NAP had effect with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.81,  = 0.002). Being male, age > 65 years, ICU department, diagnosed with certain diseases were more likely to be associated with antimicrobial resistance.
Conclusions: Antibiotic resistance rates were high in this teaching hospital. However, the introduction of the China NAP since 2016 followed by hospital policy emphasis was associated with a declining AMR trend. Policies will need to incorporate antimicrobial stewardship with a focus on certain departments, with infection control practices and with increases in vaccination coverage among elderly.

Keywords

References

  1. Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jul 01;97(7):486-501B [PMID: 31258218]
  2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;14(1):31-39 [PMID: 24161233]
  3. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Apr;16(4):725-6 [PMID: 20350403]
  4. West J Emerg Med. 2014 May;15(3):282-9 [PMID: 24868305]
  5. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1267-1269 [PMID: 30014128]
  6. Global Health. 2016 Jun 06;12(1):30 [PMID: 27267876]
  7. J Infect Public Health. 2018 May - Jun;11(3):339-346 [PMID: 29017750]
  8. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e252 [PMID: 29433663]
  9. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;39(1):116-118 [PMID: 29202892]
  10. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;19(1):56-66 [PMID: 30409683]
  11. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jun;6(6):e619-e629 [PMID: 29681513]
  12. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 1;50(5):2692-9 [PMID: 26849047]
  13. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Nov;16(11):1216-1218 [PMID: 27788972]
  14. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22 Suppl 1:S9-14 [PMID: 27000156]
  15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jun 5;370(1670):20140082 [PMID: 25918440]
  16. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;35(2):121-6 [PMID: 24049221]
  17. Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 13;7(1):11482 [PMID: 28904387]
  18. Int J Surg. 2016 Feb;26:6-11 [PMID: 26739114]
  19. Am J Infect Control. 2018 Dec;46(12):e81-e90 [PMID: 30174256]
  20. PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196668 [PMID: 29723230]
  21. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(11):2715-2721 [PMID: 29995561]
  22. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 03;9(2):e87899 [PMID: 24498394]
  23. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Apr;14(4):298-306 [PMID: 18093237]
  24. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(7):1825-7 [PMID: 26076136]
  25. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Dec;48(6):666-673 [PMID: 28128095]
  26. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;16(7):767-768 [PMID: 27208976]
  27. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Nov 17;5:48 [PMID: 27891222]
  28. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;87(1):45-48 [PMID: 27773544]
  29. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;17(6):577 [PMID: 28555574]
  30. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Mar 20;130(6):659-664 [PMID: 28303847]
  31. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2): [PMID: 29203488]
  32. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 21;49(8):5070-9 [PMID: 25830781]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Antimicrobial Stewardship
Bacteria
Bacterial Infections
Child
Child, Preschool
China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Female
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Infant
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Young Adult

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0resistancehospitalNAPantimicrobialChinatotalisolatesAMRinformationantibioticrateamong95%CIepidemiologyimpactNationalwillstewardship20152018departmentsamplesanalysisregression352238maledeclined< 0000190certainassociatedAntibioticteachingactionplanBackground:soughtunderstandcharacteristicsActionPlancriticaldevelopinterventionsstrengthensettingsMethods:Cross-sectionaldatacollectionmanagementsystem1January30AugustVariablesincludedpatientagesexdiagnosissensitivitytestT-testtwomethodappliedcompareresultsimplementationMultivariatebinarylogisticconductedexamineassociationsriskfactorsResults:finalexcludingcontaminationstrainsincomplete50%patientswere > 66 yearsold62%40%sputumAmongsample42%antibiotics53%496-564%culturepositivity8%22-1034%Logisticalshowedeffectadjustedoddsratio7671-081 = 0002age > 65 yearsICUdiagnoseddiseaseslikelyConclusions:rateshighHoweverintroductionsince2016followedpolicyemphasisdecliningtrendPoliciesneedincorporatefocusdepartmentsinfectioncontrolpracticesincreasesvaccinationcoverageelderlynationalResistanceHospitalEpidemiology

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)