Modeling maize above-ground biomass based on machine learning approaches using UAV remote-sensing data.

Liang Han, Guijun Yang, Huayang Dai, Bo Xu, Hao Yang, Haikuan Feng, Zhenhai Li, Xiaodong Yang
Author Information
  1. Liang Han: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, 100097 China.
  2. Guijun Yang: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, 100097 China.
  3. Huayang Dai: 4College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083 China.
  4. Bo Xu: National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, 100097 China.
  5. Hao Yang: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, 100097 China.
  6. Haikuan Feng: National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, 100097 China.
  7. Zhenhai Li: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, 100097 China.
  8. Xiaodong Yang: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, 100097 China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Above-ground biomass (AGB) is a basic agronomic parameter for field investigation and is frequently used to indicate crop growth status, the effects of agricultural management practices, and the ability to sequester carbon above and below ground. The conventional way to obtain AGB is to use destructive sampling methods that require manual harvesting of crops, weighing, and recording, which makes large-area, long-term measurements challenging and time consuming. However, with the diversity of platforms and sensors and the improvements in spatial and spectral resolution, remote sensing is now regarded as the best technical means for monitoring and estimating AGB over large areas.
RESULTS: In this study, we used structural and spectral information provided by remote sensing from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in combination with machine learning to estimate maize biomass. Of the 14 predictor variables, six were selected to create a model by using a recursive feature elimination algorithm. Four machine-learning regression algorithms (multiple linear regression, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and random forest) were evaluated and compared to create a suitable model, following which we tested whether the two sampling methods influence the training model. To estimate the AGB of maize, we propose an improved method for extracting plant height from UAV images and a volumetric indicator (i.e., BIOVP). The results show that (1) the random forest model gave the most balanced results, with low error and a high ratio of the explained variance for both the training set and the test set. (2) BIOVP can retain the largest strength effect on the AGB estimate in four different machine learning models by using importance analysis of predictors. (3) Comparing the plant heights calculated by the three methods with manual ground-based measurements shows that the proposed method increased the ratio of the explained variance and reduced errors.
CONCLUSIONS: These results lead us to conclude that the combination of machine learning with UAV remote sensing is a promising alternative for estimating AGB. This work suggests that structural and spectral information can be considered simultaneously rather than separately when estimating biophysical crop parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. J Plant Physiol. 2003 Mar;160(3):271-82 [PMID: 12749084]
  2. J Plant Physiol. 2004 Feb;161(2):165-73 [PMID: 15022830]
  3. J Environ Manage. 2007 Nov;85(3):616-23 [PMID: 17134821]
  4. Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Aug;14(8):454-61 [PMID: 19616467]
  5. Talanta. 2010 Sep 15;82(4):1571-5 [PMID: 20801374]
  6. Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Jan;127(1):251-60 [PMID: 24173688]
  7. Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Aug 28;6:115-25 [PMID: 25379423]
  8. Plant Methods. 2015 Mar 04;11:14 [PMID: 25767559]
  9. Plant Methods. 2015 Feb 25;11:9 [PMID: 25793008]
  10. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 28;8:421 [PMID: 28400784]
  11. Front Plant Sci. 2018 Feb 27;9:237 [PMID: 29535749]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AGBUAVmachinelearningmodelbiomassmethodsspectralremotesensingestimatingestimatemaizeusingBIOVPresultsusedcropsamplingmanualmeasurementsstructuralinformationcombinationcreateregressionrandomforesttrainingmethodplantheightratioexplainedvariancesetcanBACKGROUND:Above-groundbasicagronomicparameterfieldinvestigationfrequentlyindicategrowthstatuseffectsagriculturalmanagementpracticesabilitysequestercarbongroundconventionalwayobtainusedestructiverequireharvestingcropsweighingrecordingmakeslarge-arealong-termchallengingtimeconsumingHoweverdiversityplatformssensorsimprovementsspatialresolutionnowregardedbesttechnicalmeansmonitoringlargeareasRESULTS:studyprovidedunmannedaerialvehicle14predictorvariablessixselectedrecursivefeatureeliminationalgorithmFourmachine-learningalgorithmsmultiplelinearsupportvectorartificialneuralnetworkevaluatedcomparedsuitablefollowingtestedwhethertwoinfluenceproposeimprovedextractingimagesvolumetricindicatorieshow1gavebalancedlowerrorhightest2retainlargeststrengtheffectfourdifferentmodelsimportanceanalysispredictors3Comparingheightscalculatedthreeground-basedshowsproposedincreasedreducederrorsCONCLUSIONS:leadusconcludepromisingalternativeworksuggestsconsideredsimultaneouslyratherseparatelybiophysicalparametersModelingabove-groundbasedapproachesremote-sensingdataMachineMaizePlant

Similar Articles

Cited By