Adolescents' Perspectives on Using Technology for Health: Qualitative Study.

Ana Radovic, Carolyn A McCarty, Katherine Katzman, Laura P Richardson
Author Information
  1. Ana Radovic: Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  2. Carolyn A McCarty: Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
  3. Katherine Katzman: Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
  4. Laura P Richardson: Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.

Abstract

Background: Adolescents' wide use of technology opens up opportunities to integrate technology into health visits and health care. In particular, technology has the potential to influence adolescent behavior change by offering new avenues for provider communication and support for healthy choices through many different platforms. However, little information exists to guide the integration of technology into adolescent health care, especially adolescents' perspectives and preferences for what they find useful.
Objective: This qualitative study aimed to take a broad approach to understanding adolescents' use of technology for supporting their overall health and to understand whether and how adolescents envision using technology to enhance their health and clinical care, particularly in communicating with their provider.
Methods: Adolescents (13-18 years) were recruited to participate in semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews. Potential participants were approached in-person through the Seattle Children's Hospital Adolescent Medicine Clinic while they were waiting for consultation appointments, through outreach to youth who expressed interest in other local research study activities, and via flyers in waiting rooms. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.
Results: Thirty-one adolescents (58% female, M= 15.2 years) were interviewed and described 3 main uses of technology: (1) to gather information, (2a) to share their own experiences and (2b) view others' experiences in order to gain social support or inspiration, and (3) to track behaviors and health goals. Perceived benefits and potential downsides were identified for technology use. Teens desired to use technology with their provider for 3 main reasons: (1) have questions answered outside of visits, (2) have greater access to providers as a way to build relationship/rapport, and (3) share data regarding behaviors in between visits. Social media was not a preferred method for communicating with providers for any of the youth due to concerns about privacy and intrusiveness.
Conclusions: Although youth are avid users of technology in general, in regard to technology for health, they display specific use preferences especially in how they wish to use it to communicate with their primary care provider. Healthcare providers should offer guidance to youth with regard to how they have used and plan to use technology and how to balance potential positives and negatives of use. Technology developers should take youth preferences into account when designing new health technology and incorporate ways they can use it to communicate with their healthcare provider.

Keywords

References

  1. Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Jan;40(1):52-4 [PMID: 23250302]
  2. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;165:105-10 [PMID: 21685594]
  3. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Jan;98(1):9-15 [PMID: 22820106]
  4. J Health Commun. 2013;18(12):1465-76 [PMID: 24015829]
  5. J Adolesc Health. 2017 Jun;60(6):714-719 [PMID: 28259620]
  6. Telemed J E Health. 2016 Feb;22(2):144-152 [PMID: 26258289]
  7. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Aug;38(4):321-5 [PMID: 24962426]
  8. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Dec 18;5(4):e32 [PMID: 14713660]
  9. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 20;19(7):e261 [PMID: 28729236]
  10. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;12(4):613-625 [PMID: 27311581]
  11. J Pediatr Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):498-504 [PMID: 27184356]
  12. J Sch Health. 2013 Dec;83(12):921-30 [PMID: 24261527]
  13. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Apr;29(4):475-81 [PMID: 23528509]
  14. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013;25(2):119-25 [PMID: 23740658]
  15. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Feb;58(2):134-40 [PMID: 26802988]
  16. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012 Jun;59(3):717-27, ix [PMID: 22643176]
  17. Am J Public Health. 2008 Mar;98(3):393-5 [PMID: 18235068]
  18. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(2):126-33 [PMID: 24354340]
  19. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec;59(6):722-724 [PMID: 27884300]
  20. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):16-24 [PMID: 22771531]
  21. Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Jun;39(6):421-3 [PMID: 22592826]
  22. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):467-74 [PMID: 23079168]
  23. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1930-1939 [PMID: 28269952]

Grants

  1. K12 HS022989/AHRQ HHS
  2. K23 MH111922/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. R01 HS023383/AHRQ HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0technologyhealthusecareprovideryouthadolescent3visitspotentialpreferencesprovidersAdolescents'newsupportinformationespeciallyadolescents'qualitativestudytakeapproachadolescentsusingcommunicatingyearswaitingresearch2main1shareexperiencessocialbehaviorsmediaregardcommunicateprimaryTechnologyBackground:wideopensopportunitiesintegrateparticularinfluencebehaviorchangeofferingavenuescommunicationhealthychoicesmanydifferentplatformsHoweverlittleexistsguideintegrationperspectivesfindusefulObjective:aimedbroadunderstandingsupportingoverallunderstandwhetherenvisionenhanceclinicalparticularlyMethods:Adolescents13-18recruitedparticipatesemi-structuredin-depthindividualinterviewsPotentialparticipantsapproachedin-personSeattleChildren'sHospitalAdolescentMedicineClinicconsultationappointmentsoutreachexpressedinterestlocalactivitiesviaflyersroomsInterviewsrecordedtranscribedanalyzedthematicanalysisResults:Thirty-one58%femaleM=15intervieweddescribedusestechnology:gather2a2bviewothers'ordergaininspirationtrackgoalsPerceivedbenefitsdownsidesidentifiedTeensdesiredreasons:questionsansweredoutsidegreateraccesswaybuildrelationship/rapportdataregardingSocialpreferredmethoddueconcernsprivacyintrusivenessConclusions:AlthoughavidusersgeneraldisplayspecificwishHealthcareofferguidanceusedplanbalancepositivesnegativesdevelopersaccountdesigningincorporatewayscanhealthcarePerspectivesUsingHealth:QualitativeStudyservices

Similar Articles

Cited By