Perceptions and acceptability of an experimental Ebola vaccine among health care workers, frontline staff, and the general public during the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone.

Mohamed F Jalloh, Mohammad B Jalloh, Alison Albert, Brent Wolff, Amy Callis, Aparna Ramakrishnan, Emily Cramer, Paul Sengeh, Samuel Abu Pratt, Lansana Conteh, Rana Hajjeh, Rebecca Bunnell, John T Redd, Anna Mia Ekström, Helena Nordenstedt
Author Information
  1. Mohamed F Jalloh: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: yum8@cdc.gov.
  2. Mohammad B Jalloh: FOCUS 1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  3. Alison Albert: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  4. Brent Wolff: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  5. Amy Callis: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  6. Aparna Ramakrishnan: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  7. Emily Cramer: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  8. Paul Sengeh: FOCUS 1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  9. Samuel Abu Pratt: FOCUS 1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  10. Lansana Conteh: Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  11. Rana Hajjeh: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  12. Rebecca Bunnell: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  13. John T Redd: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  14. Anna Mia Ekström: Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Infectious diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
  15. Helena Nordenstedt: Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Experimental Ebola vaccines were introduced during the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Planning for the Sierra Leone Trial to Introduce a Vaccine against Ebola (STRIVE) was underway in late 2014. We examined hypothetical acceptability and perceptions of experimental Ebola vaccines among health care workers (HCWs), frontline workers, and the general public to guide ethical communication of risks and benefits of any experimental Ebola vaccine.
METHODS: Between December 2014 and January 2015, we conducted in-depth interviews with public health leaders (N = 31), focus groups with HCWs and frontline workers (N = 20), and focus groups with members of the general public (N = 15) in Western Area Urban, Western Area Rural, Port Loko, Bombali, and Tonkolili districts. Themes were identified using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Across all participant groups, not knowing the immediate and long-term effects of an experimental Ebola vaccine was the most serious concern. Some respondents feared that experimental vaccines may cause Ebola, lead to death, or result in other adverse events. Among HCWs, not knowing the level of protection provided by experimental Ebola vaccines was another concern. HCWs and frontline workers were motivated to help find a vaccine for Ebola to help end the outbreak. General public participants cited positive experiences with routine childhood immunization in Sierra Leone.
DISCUSSION: Our formative assessment prior to STRIVE's implementation in Sierra Leone helped identify concerns, motivations, and information gaps among potential participants of an experimental Ebola vaccine trial, at the time when an unprecedented outbreak was occurring in the country. The findings from this assessment were incorporated early in the process to guide ethical communication of risks and benefits when discussing informed consent for possible participation in the vaccine trial that was launched later in 2015.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Oct 7;1(3):e000065 [PMID: 28588954]
  2. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2016 Oct;109(4):287-295 [PMID: 27686081]
  3. Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):505-518 [PMID: 28017403]
  4. MMWR Suppl. 2016 Jul 08;65(3):50-6 [PMID: 27390018]
  5. Clin Trials. 2016 Feb;13(1):96-100 [PMID: 26768573]
  6. Vaccine. 2017 Jan 23;35(4):508-512 [PMID: 28040206]
  7. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Jun 14;11:30996 [PMID: 27307132]
  8. Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):436-443 [PMID: 29895178]
  9. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Apr;203:35-42 [PMID: 29544144]
  10. Vaccine. 2017 Jan 23;35(4):544-551 [PMID: 28024952]
  11. Vaccine. 2017 Dec 14;35(49 Pt B):6915-6923 [PMID: 28716555]
  12. MMWR Suppl. 2016 Jul 08;65(3):98-106 [PMID: 27387395]
  13. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Sep 7;95(3):654-62 [PMID: 27382077]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):1140 [PMID: 27821112]
  15. Lancet. 2017 Feb 11;389(10069):621-628 [PMID: 28017399]
  16. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Dec 15;4:68-73 [PMID: 28042619]
  17. Clin Trials. 2016 Feb;13(1):49-56 [PMID: 26768572]
  18. Vaccine. 2016 Apr 4;34(15):1767-72 [PMID: 26928073]
  19. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Apr 1;3(2):e000410 [PMID: 29629189]
  20. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Feb;13(2):266-270 [PMID: 27925844]
  21. Annu Rev Virol. 2016 Sep 29;3(1):147-171 [PMID: 27578439]
  22. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:736507 [PMID: 25755674]
  23. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 [PMID: 14769454]
  24. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 06;11(4):e0152438 [PMID: 27049322]
  25. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;980:27-36 [PMID: 28290102]
  26. Public Health Action. 2017 Jun 21;7(Suppl 1):S34-S39 [PMID: 28744437]
  27. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Nov 2;10(11):e0005093 [PMID: 27806049]
  28. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jun 15;9(6):e0003838 [PMID: 26076007]
  29. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;21(11):1897-905 [PMID: 26484940]
  30. Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):289-90 [PMID: 25324364]
  31. J Infect Dis. 2018 May 18;217(suppl_1):S6-S15 [PMID: 29788345]

Grants

  1. CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Disease Outbreaks
Ebola Vaccines
Female
Focus Groups
Health Personnel
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Sierra Leone
Young Adult

Chemicals

Ebola Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EbolaexperimentalvaccineSierraLeoneworkerspublicvaccinesoutbreakHCWsfrontlineamonghealthgeneralgroups2014-20152014acceptabilitycareguideethicalcommunicationrisksbenefits2015focusWesternAreaknowingconcernhelpparticipantsassessmenttrialPerceptionsINTRODUCTION:ExperimentalintroducedWestAfricaPlanningTrialIntroduceVaccineSTRIVEunderwaylateexaminedhypotheticalperceptionsMETHODS:DecemberJanuaryconductedin-depthinterviewsleadersN = 31N = 20membersN = 15UrbanRuralPortLokoBombaliTonkolilidistrictsThemesidentifiedusingqualitativecontentanalysisRESULTS:Acrossparticipantimmediatelong-termeffectsseriousrespondentsfearedmaycauseleaddeathresultadverseeventsAmonglevelprotectionprovidedanothermotivatedfindendGeneralcitedpositiveexperiencesroutinechildhoodimmunizationDISCUSSION:formativepriorSTRIVE'simplementationhelpedidentifyconcernsmotivationsinformationgapspotentialtimeunprecedentedoccurringcountryfindingsincorporatedearlyprocessdiscussinginformedconsentpossibleparticipationlaunchedlaterstaffAcceptabilityAttitudes

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)