Taxonomy, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas isolated from extra-intestinal and intestinal infections.

Yanyan Zhou, Li Yu, Zheng Nan, Pingping Zhang, Biao Kan, Donghui Yan, Jianrong Su
Author Information
  1. Yanyan Zhou: Center of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. ORCID
  2. Li Yu: Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, 100013, China.
  3. Zheng Nan: Center of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
  4. Pingping Zhang: Center of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
  5. Biao Kan: State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control; Department of Diarrheal Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 102206, China.
  6. Donghui Yan: Center of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. n66ydh@163.com.
  7. Jianrong Su: Center of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. youyilab@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical characteristics (taxonomy, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance ) of Aeromonas in isolated from extra-intestinal and intestinal infections were investigated to describe epidemiology, associated virulence factors and optimal therapy options.
METHODS: Clinical samples (n = 115) of Aeromonas were collected from a general hospital in Beijing between the period 2015 and 2017. Taxonomy was investigate by Multilocus phylogenetic analysis (MLPA), 10 putative virulence factors by use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antimicrobial resistance to 15 antibiotics by use of the microbroth dilution method.
RESULTS: The most common species of Aeromonas detected in samples of intestinal tract included; A. caviae (43.9%), A. veronii (35.7%), and A. dhakensis (12.2%). Prevalent species of Aeromonas collected from extra-intestinal infections included; A. hydrophila (29.4%), A. caviae (29.4%), and A. dhakensis (23.5%). A. hydrophila were detected in 1% of stool samples and 29.4% (5/17) of extra-intestinal infections. A. hydrophila strains in extra-intestinal infections were related to malignancy. The most common medical conditions among patients with Aeromonas infections included malignancy and liver-transplant related cholecystitis. Multiple drug resistance (MDR) was prevalent in extra-intestinal isolates (82.3%, 14/17) and was greater than the prevalence in intestinal isolates (30.6%, 30/98) (P < 0.05). Resistant rates of extra-intestinal isolates were 70.6, 35.3, 23.5 and 5.9% for ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and imipenem, respectively, and were higher than found in previous studies. Despite differences in the number and type of virulence genes among samples of Aeromonas, no significant correlation was found between invasion and virulent genes in intestinal or extra-intestinal infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall results of this study support a role for Aeromonas spp. as a potential causative infectious agent of gastroenteritis, and malignancy, liver cirrhosis, post liver transplantation in immunocompromised patients. A. hydrophila was more prevalent in samples of extra-intestinal infections when compared to samples of intestinal infections, and was especially prominent in samples of patients presenting with malignancy. Aeromonas isolates from extra-intestinal samples had high rates of drug resistance but 3rd generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides remain as options to treat severe diarrhea. However, increasing MDR of extra-intestinal infection samples warrants monitoring.

Keywords

References

  1. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 May 1;174(1):131-6 [PMID: 10234831]
  2. Infect Immun. 2000 Jun;68(6):3233-41 [PMID: 10816468]
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Oct;38(10):3785-90 [PMID: 11015403]
  4. Infect Immun. 2001 Jul;69(7):4257-67 [PMID: 11401962]
  5. Infect Immun. 2002 Apr;70(4):1924-35 [PMID: 11895956]
  6. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Apr;49(4):701-2 [PMID: 11909850]
  7. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Jul 15;224(1):77-83 [PMID: 12855171]
  8. Infect Immun. 2004 Mar;72(3):1248-56 [PMID: 14977925]
  9. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(5):1077-86 [PMID: 15479425]
  10. J Infect. 2007 Feb;54(2):151-8 [PMID: 16716402]
  11. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2007 Apr;25(4):235-41 [PMID: 17386217]
  12. J Food Prot. 2009 Jul;72(7):1443-9 [PMID: 19681267]
  13. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009 Dec;32(8):533-42 [PMID: 19819658]
  14. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jan;23(1):35-73 [PMID: 20065325]
  15. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Sep;29(9):1163-72 [PMID: 20549532]
  16. Intern Med. 2010;49(22):2415-21 [PMID: 21088342]
  17. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2011 May;34(3):189-99 [PMID: 21353754]
  18. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Aug;49(8):3006-8 [PMID: 21697316]
  19. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Mar;18(3):268-81 [PMID: 21793988]
  20. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30205 [PMID: 22383958]
  21. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:625023 [PMID: 22701365]
  22. Curr Microbiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):197-204 [PMID: 23129345]
  23. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013 May;36(3):171-6 [PMID: 23485124]
  24. MBio. 2013 Apr 23;4(2):e00064-13 [PMID: 23611906]
  25. ISRN Microbiol. 2012 Sep 04;2012:256261 [PMID: 23724321]
  26. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 10;9(3):e91642 [PMID: 24614100]
  27. J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Dec;117(6):1721-9 [PMID: 25195707]
  28. J Infect. 2015 Jun;70(6):600-8 [PMID: 25447712]
  29. Food Microbiol. 2015 May;47:21-7 [PMID: 25583334]
  30. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 21;10(1):e0115813 [PMID: 25607802]
  31. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;42:8-14 [PMID: 26577192]
  32. J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 Dec 01;33:26 [PMID: 26825984]
  33. Curr Microbiol. 2016 Jun;72(6):795-803 [PMID: 26868258]
  34. Germs. 2016 Sep 01;6(3):91-6 [PMID: 27622161]
  35. Infect Chemother. 2016 Dec;48(4):274-284 [PMID: 28032485]
  36. New Microbes New Infect. 2016 Nov 24;15:74-76 [PMID: 28050251]
  37. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Apr;67(3):759-760 [PMID: 28368240]
  38. Can J Microbiol. 1993 May;39(5):513-23 [PMID: 8330262]
  39. Microbiology. 1997 Mar;143 ( Pt 3):803-12 [PMID: 9084164]

Grants

  1. No.7164249/Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation
  2. No.2016-4-1101/Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aeromonas
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacterial Typing Techniques
Child
Child, Preschool
China
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Female
Gastroenteritis
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Humans
Immunocompromised Host
Intestinal Diseases
Intraabdominal Infections
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Multilocus Sequence Typing
Phylogeny
Prevalence
Virulence
Virulence Factors
Young Adult

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Virulence Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0extra-intestinalAeromonasinfectionssamplesresistanceintestinalvirulencegeneshydrophilamalignancyisolatesantimicrobialincluded294%patientsClinicalisolatedfactorsoptionscollectedTaxonomyMultilocusphylogeneticanalysisMLPAusecommonspeciesdetectedcaviae9%35dhakensis23relatedamongdrugMDRprevalentrates5foundliverBACKGROUND:characteristicstaxonomyinvestigateddescribeepidemiologyassociatedoptimaltherapyMETHODS:n = 115generalhospitalBeijingperiod20152017investigate10putativepolymerasechainreactionPCR15antibioticsmicrobrothdilutionmethodRESULTS:tract43veronii7%122%Prevalent5%1%stool5/17strainsmedicalconditionsliver-transplantcholecystitisMultiple823%14/17greaterprevalence306%30/98P < 005Resistant7063ceftriaxoneciprofloxacingentamicinimipenemrespectivelyhigherpreviousstudiesDespitedifferencesnumbertypesignificantcorrelationinvasionvirulentCONCLUSIONS:Overallresultsstudysupportrolespppotentialcausativeinfectiousagentgastroenteritiscirrhosisposttransplantationimmunocompromisedcomparedespeciallyprominentpresentinghigh3rdgenerationcephalosporinsfluoroquinolonesaminoglycosidesremaintreatseverediarrheaHoweverincreasinginfectionwarrantsmonitoringMulti-drugVirulence

Similar Articles

Cited By