C-reactive protein may be a prognostic factor for the whole gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor group.

Ömer Komaç, Göksel Bengi, Özgül Sağol, Mesut Akarsu
Author Information
  1. Ömer Komaç: Department of Internal Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir 35000, Turkey.
  2. Göksel Bengi: Department of Gastroenterology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir 35000, Turkey. drgokselbengi@hotmail.com.
  3. Özgül Sağol: Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir 35000, Turkey.
  4. Mesut Akarsu: Department of Gastroenterology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir 35000, Turkey.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a kind of single-stranded RNA of more than 200 nucleotides in length and have no protein-coding function. Amounting studies have indicated that lncRNAs could play a vital role in the initiation and development of cancers, including gastric cancer (GC). Considering the crucial functions of lncRNAs, the identification and exploration of novel lncRNAs in GC is necessary.
AIM: To identify independent prognostic markers for the whole gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) group.
METHODS: Ninety-three patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs within a specified period were included in this study. Patient data were retrospectively analyzed. The relationships between all independent variables and 5-year survival status calculated during the follow-up period (months) were assessed. In addition, the relationships between the independent variables were investigated.
RESULTS: When 5-year survival rate was compared, a statistically significant relationship between the age at diagnosis, male gender, tumor size, tumor stage, liver and/or distant metastasis, and tumor grade determined by the Ki-67 level and mitotic count, and the level of C-reactive protein (CRP), was observed. The mean survival (overall survival) of the study group was 102.5 ± 6.3 (SD) mo. The percentages of 1, 3 and 5-year survival were 90%, 72%, and 61%, respectively. In 63 of 93 patients, Ki-67 and the mitotic count determined the same grade. The Ki-67 levels in 29 patients and the mitotic count in only 1 patient were in the higher grade. The risk of death increased by 4% for every 1 year increase at the diagnosis age and was 2.0-fold higher for male patients, 3.0-fold higher for G3 according to the mitotic count, 3.7-fold higher for G3 according to the Ki-67 level, 12.7-fold higher for cases with tumor stage 3 or 4 by a 1 cm increase in the ratio of 9% in tumor size, and 6.1-fold higher for patients with liver metastasis for every 1 mg/dL increase in the ratio of 1.5% in CRP level. There was a significant difference between pancreatic and stomach NETs in favor of stomach tumors in terms of survival.
CONCLUSION: Tumor site, stage, grade and Ki-67 level affected patient survival, and it was observed that CRP affected disease progression (particularly if it was > 20 mg/dL). However, a relationship between surgical resection of the lesion and survival was not shown. Larger scale prospective studies are required to determine whether CRP level may be a poor prognostic factor for the entire GEP-NET group.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer. 2003 Feb 15;97(4):934-59 [PMID: 12569593]
  2. Histol Histopathol. 2003 Apr;18(2):353-8 [PMID: 12647784]
  3. J Clin Invest. 2003 Jun;111(12):1805-12 [PMID: 12813013]
  4. Mol Cancer Res. 2006 Apr;4(4):221-33 [PMID: 16603636]
  5. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun 21;12(23):3746-50 [PMID: 16773693]
  6. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;84(2):69-82 [PMID: 17106184]
  7. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Jan;9(1):61-72 [PMID: 18177818]
  8. Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):256-65 [PMID: 18506737]
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):3063-72 [PMID: 18565894]
  10. Hum Pathol. 2009 Sep;40(9):1262-8 [PMID: 19368957]
  11. Ann Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(9):1794-803 [PMID: 20139156]
  12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4 [PMID: 20180029]
  13. Med J Aust. 2010 Jul 5;193(1):46-52 [PMID: 20618115]
  14. Hum Pathol. 2012 Apr;43(4):489-95 [PMID: 21937080]
  15. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012 Sep 14;19(5):R163-85 [PMID: 22645227]
  16. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):152-60 [PMID: 22967994]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 1;31(4):420-5 [PMID: 23248248]
  18. J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):88-92 [PMID: 24120090]
  19. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 7;110(1):183-8 [PMID: 24201751]
  20. Endoscopy. 2014 Jan;46(1):32-8 [PMID: 24218309]
  21. Virchows Arch. 2014 Jul;465(1):49-55 [PMID: 24807732]
  22. Neuroendocrinology. 2014;100(2-3):221-7 [PMID: 25358267]
  23. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Jun;139(6):750-6 [PMID: 26030244]
  24. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Mar;101(3):937-44 [PMID: 26678655]
  25. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Mar;4(5):91 [PMID: 27047950]
  26. Haematologica. 2016 Nov;101(11):1426-1433 [PMID: 27662010]
  27. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 11;7:40609 [PMID: 28074897]
  28. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Dec;4(23):461 [PMID: 28090517]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0survivaltumorlevel1higherpatientsKi-673lncRNAsgroupgrademitoticcountCRPindependentprognosticneuroendocrine5-yearstageC-reactiveproteinincreasetumorsfactorstudiesGCwholegastroenteropancreaticGEP-NETperiodstudyrelationshipsvariablessignificantrelationshipagediagnosismalesizelivermetastasisdeterminedobserved6patientevery0-foldG3according7-foldratiomg/dLstomachaffectedmayBACKGROUND:Longnon-codingRNAskindsingle-strandedRNA200nucleotideslengthprotein-codingfunctionAmountingindicatedplayvitalroleinitiationdevelopmentcancersincludinggastriccancerConsideringcrucialfunctionsidentificationexplorationnovelnecessaryAIM:identifymarkersMETHODS:Ninety-threediagnosedGEP-NETswithinspecifiedincludedPatientdataretrospectivelyanalyzedstatuscalculatedfollow-upmonthsassessedadditioninvestigatedRESULTS:ratecomparedstatisticallygenderand/ordistantmeanoverall1025±SDmopercentages90%72%61%respectively6393levels29riskdeathincreased4%year212cases4cm9%1-fold5%differencepancreaticNETsfavortermsCONCLUSION:Tumorsitediseaseprogressionparticularly>20HoweversurgicalresectionlesionshownLargerscaleprospectiverequireddeterminewhetherpoorentireGastroenteropancreaticGastrointestinalsystemNeuroendocrinePrognostic

Similar Articles

Cited By