An Evaluation of Two Stimulus Equivalence Training Sequences on the Emergence of Novel Intraverbals.

Brittany Zaring-Hinkle, Charlotte Lynn Carp, Tracy L Lepper
Author Information
  1. Brittany Zaring-Hinkle: Department of Psychology, McNeese State University, 4205 Ryan Street, Lake Charles, LA 70605 USA.
  2. Charlotte Lynn Carp: Department of Psychology, McNeese State University, 4205 Ryan Street, Lake Charles, LA 70605 USA.
  3. Tracy L Lepper: Department of Psychology, McNeese State University, 4205 Ryan Street, Lake Charles, LA 70605 USA.

Abstract

Researchers have begun to investigate the emergence of novel intraverbals using equivalence-based instruction (EBI) in typically developing children (Carp & Petursdottir, 2012; P��rez-Gonz��lez, Herszlikowicz, & Williams, 2008). We sought to replicate and extend the previous research by investigating two stimulus equivalence training sequences (e.g., linear series-LS and one to many-OTM) in the emergence of novel intraverbals in a two-part study with college students. Experiment 1 was designed to partially replicate the previous research by training intraverbals using an LS arrangement and then testing for the emergence of novel intraverbals. Novel intraverbals did not emerge after baseline training alone for the majority of participants. Experiment 2 investigated whether a different training sequence (i.e., OTM) would result in the emergence of novel intraverbals. Novel intraverbals did emerge following baseline training alone for the majority of participants. Overall, these results suggest that training intraverbals in an OTM training sequence may establish conditional discriminations during training, which may make it a more advantageous sequence, in that following training, more novel intraverbals emerge.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Winter;43(4):763-8 [PMID: 21541164]
  2. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;41(1):53-68 [PMID: 18468279]
  3. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Fall;44(3):435-50 [PMID: 21941377]
  4. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):819-33 [PMID: 22219532]
  5. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Summer;43(2):181-94 [PMID: 21119894]
  6. Behav Anal. 2008 Fall;31(2):145-61 [PMID: 22478508]
  7. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):575-93 [PMID: 20190920]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):1-12 [PMID: 2769172]
  9. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Winter;43(4):615-33 [PMID: 21541148]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117-37 [PMID: 10418157]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):95-115 [PMID: 3346622]
  12. Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Mar;77(5):556-66 [PMID: 4122227]
  13. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):697-701 [PMID: 18189102]
  14. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Mar;43(1):19-33 [PMID: 20808493]
  15. J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):1-22 [PMID: 15898471]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  17. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Summer;42(2):191-208 [PMID: 19949509]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  19. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):437-62 [PMID: 21358904]
  20. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101-38 [PMID: 11605362]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46 [PMID: 10966100]
  22. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):239-50 [PMID: 2103584]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):571-85 [PMID: 8283149]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5 [PMID: 24821756]
  25. J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):329-44 [PMID: 22844140]
  26. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Dec;48(4):883-94 [PMID: 26391521]
  27. J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Fall;39(3):299-321 [PMID: 17020211]
  28. Am J Ment Retard. 2002 Jul;107(4):293-301 [PMID: 12069648]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0intraverbalstrainingnovelemergenceNovelemergesequenceusing&replicatepreviousresearchequivalenceestudentsExperimentbaselinealonemajorityparticipantsOTMfollowingmaydiscriminationsStimulusEmergenceIntraverbalsResearchersbeguninvestigateequivalence-basedinstructionEBItypicallydevelopingchildrenCarpPetursdottir2012P��rez-Gonz��lezHerszlikowiczWilliams2008soughtextendinvestigatingtwostimulussequencesglinearseries-LSonemany-OTMtwo-partstudycollege1designedpartiallyLSarrangementtesting2investigatedwhetherdifferentiresultOverallresultssuggestestablishconditionalmakeadvantageousEvaluationTwoEquivalenceTrainingSequencesCollegeConditionalInferentialstatisticsLinearseries

Similar Articles

Cited By