Clinically Relevant Solution for the Hypothermic Storage and Transportation of Human Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Yuriy Petrenko, Milada Chudickova, Irena Vackova, Tomas Groh, Eliska Kosnarova, Jitka Cejkova, Karolina Turnovcova, Alexander Petrenko, Eva Sykova, Sarka Kubinova
Author Information
  1. Yuriy Petrenko: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. ORCID
  2. Milada Chudickova: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
  3. Irena Vackova: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
  4. Tomas Groh: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
  5. Eliska Kosnarova: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
  6. Jitka Cejkova: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. ORCID
  7. Karolina Turnovcova: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
  8. Alexander Petrenko: Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  9. Eva Sykova: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
  10. Sarka Kubinova: Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.

Abstract

The wide use of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in clinical trials requires a full-scale safety and identity evaluation of the cellular product and subsequent transportation between research/medical centres. This necessitates the prolonged hypothermic storage of cells prior to application. The development of new, nontoxic, and efficient media, providing high viability and well-preserved therapeutic properties of MSCs during hypothermic storage, is highly relevant for a successful clinical outcome. In this study, a simple and effective trehalose-based solution was developed for the hypothermic storage of human bone marrow MSC suspensions for further clinical applications. Human bone marrow MSCs were stored at 4°C for 24, 48, and 72 hrs in the developed buffered trehalose solution and compared to several research and clinical grade media: Plasma-Lyte® 148, HypoThermosol® FRS, and Ringer's solution. After the storage, the preservation of viability, identity, and therapeutically associated properties of MSCs were assessed. The hypothermic storage of MSCs in the new buffered trehalose solution provided significantly higher MSC recovery rates and ability of cells for attachment and further proliferation, compared to Plasma-Lyte® 148 and Ringer's solution, and was comparable to research-grade HypoThermosol® FRS. There were no differences in the immunophenotype, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation and the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs after 72 hrs of cold storage in these solutions. The obtained results together with the confirmed therapeutic properties of trehalose previously described provide sufficient evidence that the developed trehalose medium can be applied as a low-cost and efficient solution for the hypothermic storage of MSC suspensions, with a high potential for translation into clinical practice.

References

  1. Cryobiology. 2000 Dec;41(4):315-8 [PMID: 11222028]
  2. Cryobiology. 2001 May;42(3):218-21 [PMID: 11578121]
  3. Cryobiology. 2002 Oct;45(2):97-108 [PMID: 12482375]
  4. Glycobiology. 2003 Apr;13(4):17R-27R [PMID: 12626396]
  5. Tissue Eng. 2004 Nov-Dec;10(11-12):1662-71 [PMID: 15684675]
  6. Cryo Letters. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(6):379-86 [PMID: 16547545]
  7. Cryo Letters. 2006 Mar-Apr;27(2):127-32 [PMID: 16794744]
  8. Ukr Biokhim Zh (1999). 2005 Sep-Oct;77(5):100-5 [PMID: 16846076]
  9. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7 [PMID: 16923606]
  10. Tissue Eng. 2007 Oct;13(10):2465-73 [PMID: 17665999]
  11. Cryo Letters. 2008 Mar-Apr;29(2):121-33 [PMID: 18516342]
  12. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2008 Oct;2(7):436-44 [PMID: 18720444]
  13. Arch Toxicol. 2009 May;83(5):493-502 [PMID: 19296088]
  14. Histol Histopathol. 2010 Nov;25(11):1403-16 [PMID: 20865663]
  15. Hum Gene Ther. 2011 Jan;22(1):19-26 [PMID: 21028982]
  16. Neurochem Int. 2011 Mar;58(4):512-20 [PMID: 21232572]
  17. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;249(8):1185-94 [PMID: 21494875]
  18. Transfus Med Hemother. 2011;38(2):125-142 [PMID: 21566713]
  19. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:577-81 [PMID: 21654884]
  20. Vaccine. 2011 Oct 19;29(45):8012-23 [PMID: 21871516]
  21. J Cell Physiol. 2012 Mar;227(3):879-84 [PMID: 22170612]
  22. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012 Jun;18(6):453-63 [PMID: 22196031]
  23. Curr Eye Res. 2012 Nov;37(11):982-9 [PMID: 22730897]
  24. Histol Histopathol. 2012 Aug;27(8):1029-40 [PMID: 22763875]
  25. J Biotechnol. 2012 Dec 31;162(2-3):224-31 [PMID: 22989486]
  26. Cell Transplant. 2013;22(6):1075-86 [PMID: 23043973]
  27. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(9):12347-60 [PMID: 23112716]
  28. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013 May;13(5):673-91 [PMID: 23339745]
  29. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013 Oct;70(20):3871-82 [PMID: 23456256]
  30. Exp Cell Res. 2013 Oct 15;319(17):2501-13 [PMID: 23792081]
  31. Cryo Letters. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):432-52 [PMID: 23995411]
  32. Cell Death Differ. 2014 Feb;21(2):216-25 [PMID: 24185619]
  33. Stem Cells Dev. 2014 May 15;23(10):1074-83 [PMID: 24417334]
  34. Cryobiology. 2014 Apr;68(2):215-26 [PMID: 24508650]
  35. Curr Drug Targets. 2014 May;15(5):551-7 [PMID: 24568549]
  36. J Vet Med Sci. 2014 Jun;76(6):923-6 [PMID: 24599064]
  37. Cytotherapy. 2015 Feb;17(2):128-39 [PMID: 24856898]
  38. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:292139 [PMID: 24995283]
  39. Cryo Letters. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):239-46 [PMID: 24997842]
  40. Mitochondrion. 2014 Nov;19 Pt A:105-12 [PMID: 25034305]
  41. Cryobiology. 2015 Oct;71(2):181-97 [PMID: 26186998]
  42. Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 14;6(23):19366-80 [PMID: 26203772]
  43. Cells Tissues Organs. 2015;200(5):307-15 [PMID: 26407140]
  44. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 02;10(10):e0139834 [PMID: 26431528]
  45. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 13;5:16570 [PMID: 26564250]
  46. Cell Transplant. 2016;25(4):645-64 [PMID: 26720923]
  47. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016 Mar;5(3):339-49 [PMID: 26826163]
  48. Front Vet Sci. 2016 Jul 22;3:56 [PMID: 27500136]
  49. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 Jan 24;8(1):14 [PMID: 28115021]
  50. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 16;11:347-353 [PMID: 28243058]
  51. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017 Jun;23(6):333-345 [PMID: 28471271]
  52. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017 Aug 14;3(8):1758-1768 [PMID: 28824959]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0storageMSCssolutionclinicalhypothermicpropertiestrehalosecellsdevelopedMSChumanidentitynewefficienthighviabilitytherapeuticbonemarrowsuspensionsHuman72 hrsbufferedcomparedPlasma-Lyte®148HypoThermosol®FRSRinger'swideusemultipotentmesenchymalstromaltrialsrequiresfull-scalesafetyevaluationcellularproductsubsequenttransportationresearch/medicalcentresnecessitatesprolongedpriorapplicationdevelopmentnontoxicmediaprovidingwell-preservedhighlyrelevantsuccessfuloutcomestudysimpleeffectivetrehalose-basedapplicationsstored4°C2448severalresearchgrademedia:preservationtherapeuticallyassociatedassessedprovidedsignificantlyhigherrecoveryratesabilityattachmentproliferationcomparableresearch-gradedifferencesimmunophenotypeosteogenicadipogenicdifferentiationimmunomodulatorycoldsolutionsobtainedresultstogetherconfirmedpreviouslydescribedprovidesufficientevidencemediumcanappliedlow-costpotentialtranslationpracticeClinicallyRelevantSolutionHypothermicStorageTransportationMultipotentMesenchymalStromalCells

Similar Articles

Cited By