Sources of Awareness of JUUL E-cigarettes in 2 Surveys of Adults in the United States.

Meghan Bridgid Moran, Julia Cen Chen-Sankey, Andy Sl Tan, Samir Soneji, Stella J Lee, Kelvin Choi
Author Information
  1. Meghan Bridgid Moran: Assistant Professor, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD;, Email: mmoran22@jhu.edu.
  2. Julia Cen Chen-Sankey: Post-doctoral Fellow, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD.
  3. Andy Sl Tan: Assistant Professor, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  4. Samir Soneji: Associate Professor, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH.
  5. Stella J Lee: Research Fellow, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  6. Kelvin Choi: Stadtman Investigator, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD.

Abstract

Since their introduction in 2015, JUUL e-cigarettes have gained >60% of the United States (US) 2018 retail market share among branded e-cigarette companies. The sources through which consumers learn about JUUL e-cigarettes is not known. We assessed the sources of awareness about JUUL through 2 cross-sectional surveys of US adults (Survey 1: 502 18-24 year-olds; Survey 2: 803 smokers age 18+). Primary measures were awareness of JUUL and sources through which participants learned about JUUL. Awareness of JUUL was greater among smokers and younger adults (age <30). Common sources of awareness were advertisements, news, and word-of-mouth. This study is the first to identify sources through which never, non-current ever, and current smokers learned about JUUL e-cigarettes. Regulatory efforts and educational interventions may opt to focus on these channels.

References

  1. Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):110-112 [PMID: 29654121]
  2. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):179-87 [PMID: 24439353]
  3. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):14-24 [PMID: 29315420]
  4. Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):298-305 [PMID: 29236549]
  5. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:1-5 [PMID: 29958115]
  6. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jul 1;188:109-112 [PMID: 29763848]
  7. Ann Behav Med. 2019 Mar 28;53(5):476-485 [PMID: 30052702]
  8. Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1283-1289 [PMID: 28640681]
  9. Prev Med. 2017 Sep;102:93-99 [PMID: 28694063]
  10. Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):115-116 [PMID: 29669749]
  11. Tob Control. 2019 Mar;28(2):146-151 [PMID: 29853561]
  12. Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;3(1):95-101 [PMID: 28083545]

Grants

  1. K01 DA037903/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. ZIA MD000006-04/Intramural NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Consumer Behavior
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Female
Humans
Information Seeking Behavior
Male
Marketing
Middle Aged
Smokers
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0JUULsourcese-cigarettesawarenesssmokersUnitedStatesUSamong2adultsSurveyagelearnedAwarenessSinceintroduction2015gained>60%2018retailmarketsharebrandede-cigarettecompaniesconsumerslearnknownassessedcross-sectionalsurveys1:50218-24year-olds2:80318+Primarymeasuresparticipantsgreateryounger<30Commonadvertisementsnewsword-of-mouthstudyfirstidentifynevernon-currentevercurrentRegulatoryeffortseducationalinterventionsmayoptfocuschannelsSourcesE-cigarettesSurveysAdults

Similar Articles

Cited By