Pharmacological Optimization for Successful Traumatic Brain Injury Drug Development.

Samuel M Poloyac, Richard J Bertz, Lee A McDermott, Punit Marathe
Author Information
  1. Samuel M Poloyac: University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  2. Richard J Bertz: University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  3. Lee A McDermott: University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  4. Punit Marathe: Department of Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to highlight the pharmacological barrier to drug development for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to discuss best practice strategies to overcome such barriers. Specifically, this article will review the pharmacological considerations of moving from the disease target "hit" to the "lead" compound with drug-like and central nervous system (CNS) penetrant properties. assessment of drug-like properties will be detailed, followed by pre-clinical studies to ensure adequate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of response. The importance of biomarker development and utilization in both pre-clinical and clinical studies will be detailed, along with the importance of identifying diagnostic, pharmacodynamic/response, and prognostic biomarkers of injury type or severity, drug target engagement, and disease progression. This review will detail the important considerations in determining pre-clinical dose selection, as well as cross-species and human equivalent dose selection. Specific use of allometric scaling, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria, as well as incorporation of biomarker assessments in human dose selection for clinical trial design will also be discussed. The overarching goal of this review is to detail the pharmacological considerations in the drug development process as a method to improve both pre-clinical and clinical study design as we evaluate novel therapies to improve outcomes in patients with TBI.

Keywords

References

  1. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008 Nov;36(11):2324-30 [PMID: 18725506]
  2. J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jan 1;31(1):19-25 [PMID: 23865516]
  3. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Mar 15;33(6):581-94 [PMID: 26671550]
  4. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016 Aug;44(8):1435-40 [PMID: 27260151]
  5. Drug Metab Dispos. 1993 Nov-Dec;21(6):1064-9 [PMID: 7905385]
  6. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Oct;323(1):346-55 [PMID: 17646430]
  7. Nat Med. 2010 Nov;16(11):1227-32 [PMID: 21052079]
  8. Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;162(6):1239-49 [PMID: 21091654]
  9. Drug Discov Today. 2012 Apr;17(7-8):310-24 [PMID: 22056715]
  10. Front Neurol. 2018 Aug 07;9:640 [PMID: 30131759]
  11. NeuroRx. 2005 Oct;2(4):541-53 [PMID: 16489364]
  12. Exp Neurol. 2004 Apr;186(2):248-51 [PMID: 15026261]
  13. Neurosci Res. 2017 Feb;115:1-4 [PMID: 27876581]
  14. Pharmacol Rev. 2001 Dec;53(4):569-96 [PMID: 11734619]
  15. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;80:135-70 [PMID: 17950374]
  16. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180280 [PMID: 28686657]
  17. Neurosurgery. 1999 Jun;44(6):1286-98 [PMID: 10371629]
  18. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Feb;95(2):179-88 [PMID: 23995268]
  19. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003 Jul;31(7):815-32 [PMID: 12814957]
  20. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Jan 6;57:171-187 [PMID: 27575715]
  21. J Pharm Sci. 2008 May;97(5):1775-800 [PMID: 17853429]
  22. Eur J Pharmacol. 1983 Feb 18;87(2-3):209-25 [PMID: 6132825]
  23. Curr Top Med Chem. 2009;9(11):965-80 [PMID: 19747120]
  24. Drug Discov Today. 2012 May;17(9-10):419-24 [PMID: 22227532]
  25. Pharm Res. 2018 Jul 12;35(9):177 [PMID: 30003344]
  26. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;97(4):347-61 [PMID: 25669455]
  27. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):11-19 [PMID: 29167877]
  28. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Jan;34(1):126-41 [PMID: 18800065]
  29. Drug Metab Lett. 2012 Jun 1;6(2):134-44 [PMID: 23061481]
  30. Front Pharmacol. 2018 May 14;9:470 [PMID: 29867477]
  31. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014 Aug;53(8):659-78 [PMID: 25056496]
  32. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 Aug;35(8):1275-84 [PMID: 17470527]
  33. Pharm Res. 2008 Apr;25(4):713-26 [PMID: 17899327]
  34. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Apr 15;32(8):527-33 [PMID: 25264814]
  35. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999 Aug;51(8):905-10 [PMID: 10504028]
  36. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010 Nov;6(11):1399-416 [PMID: 20955108]
  37. Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 Mar;29(3):296-8 [PMID: 11181498]
  38. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003 Jan;304(1):88-101 [PMID: 12490579]
  39. J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jan 15;36(2):348-359 [PMID: 29987972]
  40. Xenobiotica. 2017 Apr;47(4):346-353 [PMID: 27278858]
  41. Pharm Res. 2010 Oct;27(10):2150-61 [PMID: 20661765]
  42. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;68(3):468-74 [PMID: 24534003]
  43. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2017 Mar 15;9:1179573517693596 [PMID: 28469522]
  44. Brain Inj. 2015;29(11):1259-72 [PMID: 26274493]
  45. J Neurotrauma. 2017 Jun 1;34(11):1915-1918 [PMID: 26370183]
  46. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Sep;17(9):782-789 [PMID: 30054151]
  47. J Control Release. 2014 Sep 28;190:637-63 [PMID: 24956489]
  48. J Pharm Sci. 2004 Oct;93(10):2522-34 [PMID: 15349961]
  49. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015 Nov;35(11):1757-63 [PMID: 26058691]
  50. High Throughput. 2018 Feb 09;7(1): [PMID: 29485615]
  51. Drug Metab Dispos. 2012 Apr;40(4):779-87 [PMID: 22266779]
  52. J Pharm Sci. 2017 Sep;106(9):2758-2770 [PMID: 28412400]
  53. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;53(2):228-33 [PMID: 23436268]
  54. Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2):388-94 [PMID: 17204689]
  55. MAbs. 2011 Jan-Feb;3(1):61-6 [PMID: 20962582]
  56. Mol Pharm. 2014 Feb 3;11(2):477-85 [PMID: 24380373]

Grants

  1. R21 NS107785/NINDS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Biomarkers
Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Drug Development
Humans
Neuroprotective Agents

Chemicals

Biomarkers
Neuroprotective Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0willreviewdrugdevelopmentpre-clinicalpharmacologicalinjuryconsiderationsbiomarkerclinicaldoseselectiontraumaticbrainTBIdiseasetargetdrug-likepropertiesdetailedstudiespharmacokineticpharmacodynamicimportancedetailwellhumandesignimprovepurposehighlightbarrierdiscussbestpracticestrategiesovercomebarriersSpecificallyarticlemoving"hit""lead"compoundcentralnervoussystemCNSpenetrantassessmentfollowedensureadequatecharacteristicsresponseutilizationalongidentifyingdiagnosticpharmacodynamic/responseprognosticbiomarkerstypeseverityengagementprogressionimportantdeterminingcross-speciesequivalentSpecificuseallometricscalingcriteriaincorporationassessmentstrialalsodiscussedoverarchinggoalprocessmethodstudyevaluatenoveltherapiesoutcomespatientsPharmacologicalOptimizationSuccessfulTraumaticBrainInjuryDrugDevelopmentpharmacokineticspharmacology

Similar Articles

Cited By